Forums
-
Preflight
-
- 1.1k
- posts
-
- 144
- posts
-
- 164
- posts
-
- 547
- posts
-
-
Military Aviation
-
- 75.7k
- posts
-
- 170.6k
- posts
-
- 7.2k
- posts
-
- 15.2k
- posts
-
- 1.5k
- posts
-
-
Road to Wings
-
- 2.8k
- posts
-
- 7.1k
- posts
-
- 2.7k
- posts
-
- 631
- posts
-
-
Military Careers
-
- 66
- posts
-
- 1.4k
- posts
-
- 1.3k
- posts
-
-
Member Statistics
9,432
Total Members2,471
Most Online
-
Popular Contributors
-
Posts
-
It’s going to be pretty embarrassing for the democrats when Trump beats their female candidate twice. I would also love for the first female president to be a Republican - just to rob the DEI obsessed mafia of that and elicit their hypocrisy. -
By Lord Ratner · Posted
Create an organization that has no true measurable metric for success. Then imagine the types of officers who are going to excel and advance within that type of organization. Finally, consider the types of decisions that sort of leader will make. It's the inevitable trajectory until there is once again a measurable metric for success. -
By hindsight2020 · Posted
That is the only language HAF responds to. They have a number. It's a political number, and they won't tell you what it is, but it's the one they find acceptable before at-scale recapitalization of primary and intermediate training is taken seriously. The rest of this exercise is nothing more than your typical morale-crushing regAF practice bleeding/running in place/ people put up with until they too bail for the airlines. Which is why I no longer get my blood pressure up about all the malfeasance, nor the political double speak. Any time people of my age demo have spoken up about this issue, all you get is tone policed and Luddite accussations. The AF has accepted atrocious gaps in basic training infrastructure for decades. The T-38 and the T-7 is the most glaring example, but the T-6 GPS is a poster child example as well, especially in the context of COTS solutions. To be clear, the -6s lack of NAS RNAV 1 compliance dates back to 2009, so they've been scoffing at it for a lot longer than this thread intimates. -
By Clark Griswold · Posted
If only you weren’t so right… You gotta fight or post on BO . net… like the US Navy “reevaluation” of their basic SWO training programs after two ship collisions, it will take something probably to convince the Bobs Funny how I was thinking about this jumpseating home yesterday, the crew was young but sharp, on descent they trapped an error on approach, I think the FO had been flying the CRJ for a year he said and the CA I think for 4 years, now would in a situation with a dude with only the equivalent of T-6 only been able to back up his CA and trap the error? Maybe but methinks chance favors the prepared or well trained Anyway, to hell with T-6 only direct to FTU… -
By ClearedHot · Posted
She got a dead cat lady bounce, but she is still WAY behind in the electoral college math.
-
-
Topics
-
