Jump to content
Baseops Forums

Recommended Posts

Move Tyndall mission to literally anywhere, rebuild base as new UPT base. Move all assets of (take your pick: CBM, DLF, END) to Tyndall. Create massive reserve squadron for IPs. 80% AFRC, 20% AD, profit. AD will want to move there and AFRC guys will probably want to go full time.
Profit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, the g-man said:

Move Tyndall mission to literally anywhere, rebuild base as new UPT base. Move all assets of (take your pick: CBM, DLF, END) to Tyndall. Create massive reserve squadron for IPs. 80% AFRC, 20% AD, profit. AD will want to move there and AFRC guys will probably want to go full time.
Profit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

While that would be a solution. However you forgot one thing, it’s not near a Major Airline hub. So reserves won’t jump as much. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, the g-man said:

Move Tyndall mission to literally anywhere, rebuild base as new UPT base. Move all assets of (take your pick: CBM, DLF, END) to Tyndall. Create massive reserve squadron for IPs. 80% AFRC, 20% AD, profit. AD will want to move there and AFRC guys will probably want to go full time.
Profit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Already an asspain to get to for a TR and the Raptor/WESP need the overwater airspace.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Lawman said:

Yeah looking at this if we’re thinking “are we taking an unnecessary risk” I think the smart Lowest cost highest payoff universal move is building on site protection. 

HAS, Purpose built hangers, whatever... I think this might make a military that has 20 silver bullets parked in Missouri that cannot be replaced go “hey maybe I can spend some cash on a better garage for my stuff.”

 

for the cost of 1 B-2 or 2-3 Raptors..... what could you build...

When I was stationed at Camp Smith I remember someone telling me that PACAF looked at building HASes for the E-3s at Kadena but each HAS would cost $1 billion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I was stationed at Camp Smith I remember someone telling me that PACAF looked at building HASes for the E-3s at Kadena but each HAS would cost $1 billion...


I mean... Wright Patt spent like 8 million dollars to build a bathroom on the golf course back in the 90s, so while it’s totally possible to spend that much I’m almost sure it’s because we’re stupid.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, waveshaper said:

Image result for eglin afb air space map

They don't "need" the overwater airspace as much as I need to fly direct from FLL or MCO to MSY or HOU.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, torqued said:

They don't "need" the overwater airspace as much as I need to fly direct from FLL or MCO to MSY or HOU.

Uhh, yes, they do.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/14/2018 at 8:06 AM, Lord Ratner said:

I wonder how many F22s it would have cost to dig underground plane shelters. And no scoffing. If we can land on the moon, build a missile tracking base in a mountain, and drive floating airports all over the ocean, we could have built a few big basements for planes as small as fighters in hurricane land.

You’re a special kind of stupid aintcha?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You’re a special kind of stupid aintcha?
I guess so. I'm not sure which is crazier, this tunnel, which is clearly impossible given the water table and hurricane activity in the region, or that a bunch of educated adults who literally fly through the air on the magic of (decades-old) human innovation think that we couldn't find a way protect small airplanes from wind and water.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Miami_Tunnel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking if we have erred strategically in placing such a large fleet of expensive assets in harm's way is a valid question.  It's an ORM problem akin to a preflight ORM.  There is a level of acceptable risk with each mission and with each basing decision.  Looking to see if this risk was appropriately evaluated is pretty much what we do anytime there is an aircraft mishap.

We have plenty of AF assets in tornado alley.  Lots of others sit in other beach-side hurricane zones.  Some sit on earthquake faults.  But, just like any aircraft mishap, we need to look back and decide if the risk was worth the price.

In this case, it was potentially an extremely steep price.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Buddy Spike said:

Uhh, yes, they do.

I dunno. I kinda feel like the inconvenience of me always flying around that airspace far exceeds the necessity for someone else to fly in circles within it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, torqued said:

I dunno. I kinda feel like the inconvenience of me always flying around that airspace far exceeds the necessity for someone else to fly in circles within it.

If you're not getting paid by the minute, you're doing it wrong anyway.  

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess so. I'm not sure which is crazier, this tunnel, which is clearly impossible given the water table and hurricane activity in the region, or that a bunch of educated adults who literally fly through the air on the magic of (decades-old) human innovation think that we couldn't find a way protect small airplanes from wind and water.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Miami_Tunnel

I’m glad someone mentioned this. There are tunnels in coastal cities all over the US, even with the high water table. Houston has no tunnels, but has underground walkways downtown. The issue would be controlling the flooding from a storm surge, but I’m sure that can be figured out...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell, I say reopen K.I. Sawyer in the upper peninsula of Michigan, turn and burn over Lake Superior. Learn to love snow and cold weather OP's. Or any other northern tier old remote SAC base.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Prosuper said:

Hell, I say reopen K.I. Sawyer in the upper peninsula of Michigan, turn and burn over Lake Superior. Learn to love snow and cold weather OP's. Or any other northern tier old remote SAC base.  

Just don’t drink the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎/‎15‎/‎2018 at 7:44 AM, brabus said:

Consider the extra time, money, and depot absorption limfacs to push normal phase externally. Unlikely to be a palatable Plan A. The most cost effective and efficient way forward is likely in the realm of building HAS with weather driving the design (as lawman pointed).

One thing that surprised me about Eglin was why they didn't use all the existing Hardened Aircraft Shelters on the base/reservation to store stuff during hurricanes. I was stationed there 5 times in my career/lots of hurricanes/hurricane prep/evacuations of flyable aircraft and stuffing the broke birds/equipment in hangers, etc. Same fallible drill every time.

Edited by waveshaper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RUMIT - 17...I repeat 17 F-22s were left at Tyndall to weather Hurricane Michael.  10% of the current fleet damaged by one storm...ouch.

DpRqqqMU4AI1pM7.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, ClearedHot said:

RUMIT - 17...I repeat 17 F-22s were left at Tyndall to weather Hurricane Michael.  10% of the current fleet damaged by one storm...ouch.

DpRqqqMU4AI1pM7.jpg:large

Forget about the Raptors - more importantly, how many T-38As were damaged in the storm?  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×