The Next President is...

[Negatory]

13 minutes ago, slc said:

Where the f are you buying eggs lol

Whoa buddy, gettin defensive there, check the charts bucko.

Wholesale eggs May 21: $0.70

Eggs now: $3.08

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/eggs-us

[slc]

lol nah not defensive. Incredulous. I wanna know why I didn’t find those .70 eggs out there and now I’m paying 3-something

[Biff_T]

Eggs.

Supposedly, Epstein's dong was shaped like an egg.   

 

Edit:  I hope the President is innocent.  For the sake of America .

Edited Saturday at 05:52 AM by Biff_T
Afterthought

[bfargin]

If there was any evidence that the Donald had sexually abused kids the dems would have used it/published it.

The WSJ piece was another big hyped up nothing burger.

 

[bfargin]

16 hours ago, Biff_T said:

Eggs.

Supposedly, Epstein's dong was shaped like an egg.   

 

Edit:  I hope the President is innocent.  For the sake of America .

Agreed, if guilty, fry him along with all of the others involved!

[arg]

4 minutes ago, bfargin said:

Agreed, if guilty, fry him along with all of the others involved!

Scrambled or over easy?

[Biff_T]

4 minutes ago, arg said:

Scrambled or over easy?

Huevos rancheros

[Lord Ratner]

18 hours ago, Biff_T said:

I guess rape is cool.   If Trump raped tweens and had a man murdered, then he can put all of those cheap eggs into his ass.   

So. I'm kind of on both sides of the fence on this one. 

 

I think if Epstein was running an espionage operation, officially or unofficially, then Trump, Clinton, Bill Gates, and others who went to the island are almost certainly implicated. 

 

However. There does not seem to be any evidence that this was anything other than a guy who liked to rape little girls and, completely separately, hang out with other rich and famous people. With that many girls involved you would have more than one or two named witnesses. You would have people closely associated, even if they couldn't corroborate, with more than just "it happened." There would be something. And right now it looks like there is nothing. 

 

If Epstein had a list of compromised clients, I believe it's completely possible that list was kept in physical form and could be destroyed. But that doesn't erase the dozens or hundreds of associated parties that just aren't turning up.

 

Like I said, if it was more than a pervert and his girlfriend raping girls on an island, then I think it is more likely than not that Trump is implicated. But it is increasingly looking like there's no one else

[Biff_T]

18 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:

 But it is increasingly looking like there's no one else

I agree.  

Edit: Any connection? 

Giora Even Epstein, Israel's most decorated fighter pilot and world’s top supersonic jet ace, dies aged 87 | The Times of Israel https://share.google/IdcvQRKOIHl3tRewh

Edited Saturday at 06:11 PM by Biff_T
Afterthought

[HeloDude]

The evidence that Trump raped underage girls is about as strong as the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia.  
 

As others have said, if the Dems had this on Trump, they most definitely would have released it before Nov 2024.  Until someone can give me a legitimate reason that such evidence exists and then further why the Dems intentionally chose to not release it, then it can all be easily dismissed without evidence.

[Negatory]

Calling the files a “hoax” or stating that they don’t exist just isn’t the message for an administration that campaigned on releasing them and has said they exist multiple times.

[GKinnear]

Trump DOJ is filing to unseal the records and Maxwell's grand jury testimony...seems like he's currently doing more than previous administrations (including his 1st) to expose the Epstein cover-up.

 

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/19/nx-s1-5473430/trump-calls-release-jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-testimony

 

Of course, some if it is heavily redacted, and possibly unverified accusations from victims.  Some of the accused may be guilty, some may be innocent...regardless the reputation of a lot of people on both sides of the political aisle are about to get crucified in the public sphere, I expect.

[BashiChuni]

33 minutes ago, Negatory said:

Calling the files a “hoax” or stating that they don’t exist just isn’t the message for an administration that campaigned on releasing them and has said they exist multiple times.

i agree 100%. and it shows how powerful the forces behind Epstein are. remember he was given a sweetheart deal under the bush administration. 

this is a bipartisan issue any American who cares about who truly is running the country can get behind. 

trump is probably not in the files (that'd have come out in 2016, 2020, or 2024 election cycle), but he's obviously being pressured to not disclose them. 

[herkbier]

4 hours ago, HeloDude said:

The evidence that Trump raped underage girls is about as strong as the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia.  
 

As others have said, if the Dems had this on Trump, they most definitely would have released it before Nov 2024.  Until someone can give me a legitimate reason that such evidence exists and then further why the Dems intentionally chose to not release it, then it can all be easily dismissed without evidence.

Or… the Dems don’t want to expose their dirty laundry as well.

[uhhello]

The years of delay and lack of prosecution makes it pretty clear that all parties and folks are involved in some aspect.  

[disgruntledemployee]

I'm going with The MAD Theory.  Both Ds, Rs, lefty richies, righty richies, etc., are on the "list" and any disclosure of any of them will result in mutually assured destruction by the rest.  Hence why any existing list is ash.  Maxwell knows enough.  If she has any family, they are likely the collateral keeping her mouth shut.

Fascinating theater.

[brabus]

Of course even if a list is released, it’s still circumstantial evidence; nothing illegal about flying to an island. We all can likely infer with high accuracy what happened, but without further evidence, there’s nothing legally that can or will be done. I suppose some reputations will go down the shitter, but there won’t be any real justice. 
 

So that really makes it a big WTF the Trump admin is fucking with this. Nobody’s going to jail over appearance on a list, so why are they so concerned? Is this all really just for saving face? Insane. 

Edited yesterday at 03:34 AM by brabus

[dream big]

15 hours ago, BashiChuni said:

i agree 100%. and it shows how powerful the forces behind Epstein are. remember he was given a sweetheart deal under the bush administration. 

this is a bipartisan issue any American who cares about who truly is running the country can get behind. 

trump is probably not in the files (that'd have come out in 2016, 2020, or 2024 election cycle), but he's obviously being pressured to not disclose them. 

Has anyone ever been able to pressure Trump? He’s done whatever he wants no matter what anyone says. I do think his DOJ will eventually release them and his “hoax” comments is his way to downplay them since they are clearly not this smoking gun that everyone expected. 

[Negatory]

By claiming that the files were a hoax designed to incriminate him, he has already implicitly admitted that he’s in them. It was probably completely accidental, but think about it: why would he claim that the evidence was faked to make him look bad if the evidence didn’t make him look bad?

As soon as he claimed it was a hoax to hurt him, he admitted that there was evidence (contrary to Bondi’s claims) and he was incriminated by it (in spite of his own claims).

Edit:

Remember when multiple folks on this forum were eating this up?

Edited 4 hours ago by Negatory

[Negatory]

 

 

 

For the do your own research folks - aka this forum - Trump’s name is circled within the black book. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. Here is the explanation.

 

Source:

https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf

All they have to do to prove innocence and stop this is release the evidence and prove that it does not implicate the admin. No im not saying to release videos of child abuse, but they should absolutely release testimony about the contents of said videos.

All they have to do to imply guilt is to gaslight the American people that the evidence doesn’t exist. 70% of Americans don’t believe the admin right now, this has the potential to turn into a bigger scandal.