brabus
-
Posts
4,312 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
195
brabus's Achievements
-
Marlins (not a Remlin) are my favorite. Winchester and Henry are great too, model dependent (subjective of course). If you’re looking for fun range shooting, don’t go too big on the caliber…if you’re looking to knock down Griz, moose, etc. then big is better.
-
Would have to kill that and Medicaid to have a chance. But nobody from either party wants to do that because it’d be political suicide. The people will yell about taxes and debts, but they are simultaneously hooked on their gov free shit/programs. Voters want their cake and eat it too. Pragmatic people know we’re never getting out of debt without significantly curtailing entitlement programs and/or significantly raising taxes. And so the march to defaulting continues…
-
The better phrasing is did anybody think any president in the 21st century was going to reduce the deficit? This is not a current or future excuse for the Trump admin. But just a means to highlight this is not a Trump problem, it is an everybody problem. To be fair, Trump has done better than his predecessors, but by no means am I cheering the current state that he, along with the guys prior to him, have had their hands in helping perpetuate.
-
@BuddhaSixFour To be honest, DOGE and this bill combined are cutting trillions in wasteful spending, not “pennies.” Now what I don’t like is why are we possibly adding upwards of 3-4 trillion to the deficit? Essentially this negates all the wasteful spending we’re cutting. I suppose the positive for one side is at least the money is potentially being spent on things they agree with/can accept vs. the alternatives. Regardless, I don’t like it at all. I’d like to know what spending falls under the massive amount earmarked under ways and means? Don’t have time to dig into it, but they’d be very hard pressed to convince me it makes sense to add to the deficit.
-
We finally found Biff’s red line, it does exist!
-
The gov is responsible for stupid requirements/requirements creep (this category is quite expansive), forcing the B model (part of requirements cat, but worthy of specific mention), establishing the JPO and giving 69 seats (hyperbole, but it’s a lot) at the table to literally vote on simple shit like what a button on the stick does, a fucked up like a football bat IOT&E program, etc. I hate LM too, and they share in the fuckery for sure, but the gov is not innocent. And I think that was CH’s primary point above.
-
@Biff_T That may be true, but would you dibs?
-
Slight change of direction: near collision on runway at Midway. First 30 sec of this video is all you need to watch (and on mute): Don’t have time to listen to ATC audio. Good job on whoever recognized the issue and directed the SWA go around.
-
@ClearedHot What are the 5?
-
@ClearedHot Regarding industry - you make valid points, but Clark’s point also has some validity. The panacea answer is somewhere in the middle. There’s a lot of “getting fucked” done to and by the gov, industry, and the only entity that purely just gets fucked is the taxpayer. Industry plays an equal part along side the gov in that and there are some screws that need to be tightened on both entities. I think it’s fair to say relative to each other, neither one is the “bigger” victim.
-
Do you get this worked up about every mass layoff? What about all the people forced out of a job because they wouldn’t take an experimental vaccine (fed and private sector)? The problem is you and the rest of the Dems have decided to put fed workers on a pedestal (except the ones who didn’t take the vax, fuck them right?) because it’s a convenient means to try to throw political poop at your opponent. Also, I think we’ll be seeing plenty of efficiency, reform, and process improvement over time.
-
Irrelevant. Are WARs (or similar) bad? I don’t think so. I’ve also been very clear that this specific scenario is a shit show. I’m not defending who or how, but I will say the concept is sound and widely used. That is all.
-
Agree with everything else you said. Just highlighting this comment wildly simplifies a ridiculous process. It’s so far from being as simple as you just made it sound. I think it should be as easy as you made it sound, but that is far from reality.
-
It wouldn’t have accomplished anything. The 5th time wouldn’t have accomplished anything. That’s how fucked the “damn near can’t fire fed civ” process is. I feel like not a lot of people realize how ridiculous it is.
-
For sure. I don’t believe pretty much anything without evidence, but it is an interesting claim (without proof so far). I’ve also worked on the fed civ side for a bit and supervised civs, so l understand the system. Still have no problem with say, monthly, “what’d you accomplish” reports. I’ve been doing that at two jobs for the last two years. It’s not hard and it’s understandable.
