brabus
-
Posts
4,314 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
195
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by brabus
-
Absolutely. Multiple countries already using A330 tankers, it’s the best gas passer I’ve ever taken gas from, and it’s not a Boeing. We are retarded for not having done this years ago.
-
Depends on the community. I can’t speak for Army RW, but a 1000 hr IP in a fighter is fairly experienced. Flight hours cannot necessarily be compared across communities to determine comparable experience/capability levels.
-
Marlins (not a Remlin) are my favorite. Winchester and Henry are great too, model dependent (subjective of course). If you’re looking for fun range shooting, don’t go too big on the caliber…if you’re looking to knock down Griz, moose, etc. then big is better.
-
Would have to kill that and Medicaid to have a chance. But nobody from either party wants to do that because it’d be political suicide. The people will yell about taxes and debts, but they are simultaneously hooked on their gov free shit/programs. Voters want their cake and eat it too. Pragmatic people know we’re never getting out of debt without significantly curtailing entitlement programs and/or significantly raising taxes. And so the march to defaulting continues…
-
The better phrasing is did anybody think any president in the 21st century was going to reduce the deficit? This is not a current or future excuse for the Trump admin. But just a means to highlight this is not a Trump problem, it is an everybody problem. To be fair, Trump has done better than his predecessors, but by no means am I cheering the current state that he, along with the guys prior to him, have had their hands in helping perpetuate.
-
@BuddhaSixFour To be honest, DOGE and this bill combined are cutting trillions in wasteful spending, not “pennies.” Now what I don’t like is why are we possibly adding upwards of 3-4 trillion to the deficit? Essentially this negates all the wasteful spending we’re cutting. I suppose the positive for one side is at least the money is potentially being spent on things they agree with/can accept vs. the alternatives. Regardless, I don’t like it at all. I’d like to know what spending falls under the massive amount earmarked under ways and means? Don’t have time to dig into it, but they’d be very hard pressed to convince me it makes sense to add to the deficit.
-
We finally found Biff’s red line, it does exist!
-
The gov is responsible for stupid requirements/requirements creep (this category is quite expansive), forcing the B model (part of requirements cat, but worthy of specific mention), establishing the JPO and giving 69 seats (hyperbole, but it’s a lot) at the table to literally vote on simple shit like what a button on the stick does, a fucked up like a football bat IOT&E program, etc. I hate LM too, and they share in the fuckery for sure, but the gov is not innocent. And I think that was CH’s primary point above.
-
@Biff_T That may be true, but would you dibs?
-
Slight change of direction: near collision on runway at Midway. First 30 sec of this video is all you need to watch (and on mute): Don’t have time to listen to ATC audio. Good job on whoever recognized the issue and directed the SWA go around.
-
@ClearedHot What are the 5?
-
@ClearedHot Regarding industry - you make valid points, but Clark’s point also has some validity. The panacea answer is somewhere in the middle. There’s a lot of “getting fucked” done to and by the gov, industry, and the only entity that purely just gets fucked is the taxpayer. Industry plays an equal part along side the gov in that and there are some screws that need to be tightened on both entities. I think it’s fair to say relative to each other, neither one is the “bigger” victim.
-
Do you get this worked up about every mass layoff? What about all the people forced out of a job because they wouldn’t take an experimental vaccine (fed and private sector)? The problem is you and the rest of the Dems have decided to put fed workers on a pedestal (except the ones who didn’t take the vax, fuck them right?) because it’s a convenient means to try to throw political poop at your opponent. Also, I think we’ll be seeing plenty of efficiency, reform, and process improvement over time.
-
Irrelevant. Are WARs (or similar) bad? I don’t think so. I’ve also been very clear that this specific scenario is a shit show. I’m not defending who or how, but I will say the concept is sound and widely used. That is all.
-
Agree with everything else you said. Just highlighting this comment wildly simplifies a ridiculous process. It’s so far from being as simple as you just made it sound. I think it should be as easy as you made it sound, but that is far from reality.
-
It wouldn’t have accomplished anything. The 5th time wouldn’t have accomplished anything. That’s how fucked the “damn near can’t fire fed civ” process is. I feel like not a lot of people realize how ridiculous it is.
-
For sure. I don’t believe pretty much anything without evidence, but it is an interesting claim (without proof so far). I’ve also worked on the fed civ side for a bit and supervised civs, so l understand the system. Still have no problem with say, monthly, “what’d you accomplish” reports. I’ve been doing that at two jobs for the last two years. It’s not hard and it’s understandable.
-
AI? Interestingly I just saw an X post that they suspect some cases of dead/non-existent people (or at least non-existent at work ever, literally) on the fed payroll. In those cases there won’t be an answered email, or that’s the thought at least. I’m guessing cooler heads prevail and nobody on leave is getting fired, and in the end this is well-intentioned, but poorly executed with low SA on salient points like people on leave, traveling with limited email connectivity, people who actually are doing shit that matters instead of mouth breathing on email, etc.
-
The baseline data request itself is a good thing. The method (blast from OPM with seemingly zero coord) and supposed timeline/threat is bullshit.
-
You didn’t obey the wife, so he yelled at you? WTF!
-
Valid, I could have replaced “people” with things like first GOP to win popular vote in 20 years (by over 2M), ass whooping in the EC, polling show strong support for his big ticket items, etc. Words matter, I know. Bottom line is he has a strong mandate from the voters to accomplish what he has set out to do. How far will he stray off the track remains to be seen. So far he has remained pretty solidly on the track he campaigned on. I hope you’re wrong too on 1 and 2, but I’m not going to jump confidently on the other side of that bet…because I’m not a blind worshiper and I don’t know enough to confidently say it’s going to be wins all around. I am confident that we need to drastically do something different. The status quo is incredibly bad. Maybe this path is the right way (some much smarter people than I in these subjects seem to think so), but maybe it doesn’t yield what we all hope for in the end. I don’t know, but I am rooting for a positive reversal trend of 1 and 2, let’s hope this gameplan works better than the previous game plans.
-
Cool, so we mostly agree on all that. I’m not following. What is it I don’t mean? Are you saying I actually don’t support the things I listed previously (reducing FWA, etc.)? I won’t as long as it’s not blatantly illegal shit (but I agree with you there will be people who do). I prefer, probably like you, congressionally created law. But we can probably also agree that congress is a massively fucked up machine that is barely functional. That really puts a president with a mandate between a rock and a hard place, regardless of the letter next to their name. So he can either start producing and hope he can get the jackasses in congress to catch up, or he can sit on his hands and produce nothing and let down the majority of the country who voted for the exact things he’s doing. I understand you don’t agree with some or all of those things, but the majority of people do. I absolutely have acknowledged the status quo is rapidly changing and there are many consequences to many people/agencies/groups attached to these changes. Yes, I so far like them. No, none of us can fully know what the ramifications are way down the road. We can hypothesize and make educated guesses, but in the end we will have to wait and see where we are in X, Y, and Z years. I am confident of one thing though, we simply cannot keep operating how we have been.
-
I meant exactly what I said. Are you also on the tantrum train because you don’t like your team not being the ones doing something? You guys aren’t getting let off the hook ,sorry bros.
-
The only thing this type of statement says is you’re against improving financial transparency, cutting FWA, improving financial systems operation, increasing accountability, reducing bloated federal spending, and reducing the deficit. Or if you tell me you’re not against those things, then you’re simply being a partisan hack throwing a tantrum because your team isn’t the one doing the work. The good news is you can choose to stop being a partisan hack and acknowledge when something good is done, regardless of who did it. A good example of this is me throwing Clinton props where props are due, even though I don’t align with him on many other things. Now you try…
-
Clinton did a good job with reducing the federal bureaucracy and getting finances under control. I hope Trump can accomplish the same feats regarding these topics.
