August 19, 201411 yr My flight didn't meet one weekly goal the entire time. Our last weeks goal was to have 100% graduate and we didn't even accomplish that! Flight ranking: 33/33
August 19, 201411 yr YES! Our flight was 33/33 as well! We had a good time. No DG's and a lot of empty beer cans.
August 19, 201411 yr Flight was 28/30. We had great camaraderie and partied but did sh-tty on all the team events. BUT - the DG system worked in our case. Went in 2010. It may have changed, but at the time your ranking was a mix of flight (peer) input, flight ranking, grades, and flight/cc input - in that order. As I recall your peer input was worth 40-50% and flt/cc ranking was only 10%. They added them all up and the top 10% in the school were the DGs. So to make DG you couldn't be a self-serving dick because your flight mates would see it and rank you that way. Additionally, if you did well as a team you had a better shot at getting more DGs in your flight. We did shitty and thus only got one DG. But it was the right person and everyone was rooting for her. She was a no-bullshitting ABM patch who was the first to bitch about the corniness of the school but also the first to help out anyone in the flight and give her all in the team events (even though we blew nearly every one). She led well when it was her turn to lead, and followed well when it was her turn to follow. I agree that the SOS DG is given too much weight in one's career, but at least as the system was when I went through I disagree that SOS DGs are self-serving dicks. Because at least nowadays, the most important factor in the award is peer-input & feedback - I don't get how you can be a SSD (self-serving dick) and have your teammates rank you well enough to land in the top 10%. If it's changed then let me know - the cadre was pretty open about how the system worked with us back then. zb
August 19, 201411 yr Sounds like you guys did SOS right. Always cracked me up seeing the "motivated" flights studying, organized PT, working on the weekends (I shit you not), etc. while you're drinking your face off and using SOS for the vacation it is. Damn. We did zero organized PT and bought kegs on two weekends while we were there...and we were #1/7 in the squadron with 2 DGs.
August 19, 201411 yr At SOS now and in our "welcome brief" they seemed to downplay DG. According to the new CC out of the last 5 CSAF's only one was an SOS DG.
August 19, 201411 yr In my US Airways indoc class, out of 7 military dudes, 5 were DGs from CGO level PME. If you want to get hired by an airline, make sure to check that container.
August 19, 201411 yr In my US Airways indoc class, out of 7 military dudes, 5 were DGs from CGO level PME. If you want to get hired by an airline, make sure to check that container. How did that come up? So to speak.
August 19, 201411 yr In my US Airways indoc class, out of 7 military dudes, 5 were DGs from CGO level PME. If you want to get hired by an airline, make sure to check that container. Edit: gravedigger got it first.
August 19, 201411 yr Slight thread drift: feedback from airline interviews say that they also like to see AAD and some form of community service. Granted, this is just for the interview, and I can't imagine they give two shits once you're hired, but it's still interesting nonetheless.
August 19, 201411 yr If by AAD you mean a Bachelor degree, then yes. Bachelor degrees in general are highly desired but not required. High school diplomas are generally required. Can't speak to community service. Of all the apps I've filled out I've seen it mentioned once, on AA as I recall.
August 19, 201411 yr In my US Airways indoc class, out of 7 military dudes, 5 were DGs from CGO level PME. If you want to get hired by an airline, make sure to check that container.How this came up is a good question, but another question worth asking is why 5 dudes with career-enhancing DG accolades decide to get out of the AF? Of course this question is rhetorical since this thread explains a lot of it, but it is a question the AF should be asking but probably doesn't recognize the significance of it yet.
August 19, 201411 yr Went in 2010. It may have changed, but at the time your ranking was a mix of flight (peer) input, flight ranking, grades, and flight/cc input - in that order. As I recall your peer input was worth 40-50% and flt/cc ranking was only 10%. They added them all up and the top 10% in the school were the DGs. zb It may have changed since then. Granted I went on a waiver in 2012, but DG was decided about 3 days before our final peer evals were done. Unless they took the midterm eval and used it in your percentage breakdown. Either way, several guys I know that have DG'd around the 2011-2013ish classes all have 20lb brains and severely lack in common sense. Maybe that's what big blue wants for those particular years as GOs though. Hence why I'm curious if anyone knows the truth of it all. I mean, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if our future leaders are just damn good at writing papers based off a movie we watched in class while I was tending to a hangover and counting down the hours before I could start again.
August 19, 201411 yr If by AAD you mean a Bachelor degree, then yes. Bachelor degrees in general are highly desired but not required. High school diplomas are generally required. Can't speak to community service. Of all the apps I've filled out I've seen it mentioned once, on AA as I recall. If you're talking about formal requirements, OK, college is only "highly desired." In reality, effectively zero guys without a college degree are getting hired (hell, getting interviewed) at the legacies without it right now....
August 19, 201411 yr But soon.... They'll be throwing signing bonuses at anyone with a restricted ATP that doesn't lick the window in the interview room! (Cue butters)
August 20, 201411 yr When I interview a candidate for a position with my company, the question of whether or not they are PME complete and their DG status is the first. This is followed by a line of questions regarding their ability to lead by PowerPoint, their PT score, and whether they prefer to backstab or openly roll over their bros on their way to their next promotion.
August 20, 201411 yr So, back to things that are wrong: Deploying 60% of your support force (Comm, FSS, Finance, SF, etc) while flying operational missions out of the base. Because AEFNEXT or whatever shit we're calling it now. Don't forget those TCN taskings that came up last second or the reclama's that come down. Enjoy the ESD boys, at least they'll have people around to pick up the phone... eventually.
August 20, 201411 yr But soon.... They'll be throwing signing bonuses at anyone with a restricted ATP that doesn't lick the window in the interview room! (Cue butters) Nope, they will be paying for full ATPs soon
August 20, 201411 yr So, back to things that are wrong: Deploying 60% of your support force (Comm, FSS, Finance, SF, etc) while flying operational missions out of the base. Because AEFNEXT or whatever shit we're calling it now. It should be called AEFPAST. This is how we deployed at one point in time. I am not sure about this one yet, but generally speaking deploying as a unit instead of onesie, twosie is how I would prefer to go. Posted from the NEW Baseops.net App!
August 20, 201411 yr AETC all call next week for SQ/CCs, last minute, mandatory.....and go In response to FAIPgate 2014. I'm going to make t-shirts
August 20, 201411 yr In response to FAIPgate 2014. I'm going to make t-shirts shhhhh! We can't speak of this incident!
August 20, 201411 yr AETC all call next week for SQ/CCs, last minute, mandatory.....and go Already had one for CBM, DLF, END last week
Create an account or sign in to comment