Solid "twoop" on the algorithm; rage = clicks, and that's what it homes in on. I've deliberately chosen to consume less of that space, for reasons that you've articulated.
That said, I've consumed just enough to build awareness, which I think is a good thing. While I have no appetite to be confrontational with LE, (auditors, imo, are insufferable, but I will begrudgingly admit, necessary) I have enough awareness to not participate in what is clearly the LE cabal's game (cabal = stakeholders, department leadership, unions, legal profit farm). First line of defense: say less, if nothing at all. Record every interaction. Be polite, professional even. At the very least, understand Terry, Mimms. Never consent to anything, especially a search, and positively state that consent is not given.
My biggest phobia is DUI stop/checkpoint. It's become clear that you could be sober as a mountain stream, but if that guy needs his nut, you're along for the ride. Trick is to keep quiet and maintain comportment, let them build the case against themselves. Drug Recognition Experts is nothing but a fleecing scheme cooked up by federal bureaucrats.
====BREAK, BREAK====
I deliberately left out LEOs in what I call the "cabal" above; like I said, I think they are patsy's in the bigger picture. Mostly wanting to serve, like many in this group. What's painful to see though, is that they are routinely exposed to traumatic experiences on a level that has decimated our veteran ranks to suicide. And like our Vietnam era forefathers, they are feeling ostracized and hated.
But most importantly, and I really think that this is by design, the system is oriented to drive a wedge between the public and the line cop, fomenting the idea that the community and it's LEOs are somehow enemies. Unless you have a vision of Statism, it's an unsustainable path, imo.