All Activity

Does this mean MAGA believes Global Warming is real now?

Libs don’t like it, but the rules have changed. Power begets power. Alliances must be reconsidered. And if it requires some constitutional understandings be re-litigated, we should do it to ensure our country is prioritized.

The security environment has changed / gotten more dangerous I don’t like it but methinks behind the scenes the other players are maneuvering their chess pieces, developing systems they are not publicly disclosing, preparing for another major military action to change the world order to their benefit. Blocking this is in our interest and Europe’s. Perhaps a bit over dramatic but a scene from the Netflix series the Diplomat gives a fictional but realistic reasoning why we need a new status with Greenland It’s strategic real estate in preparation for the inevitable tension and stand off in the Arctic, for basing and securing the North Atlantic and a source of the minerals we will need to build tech, weapons and prosperity to keep authoritarian regimes at bay. We are not perfect but we are a helluva lot better than the alternative hegemony.

Retook my TBAS, now have a 96 PCSM now! Going for the FY27 UFT Crossflow! Glad I retook my TBAS. AFOQT Pilot: 86 PCSM: 96 2xAnnual Award winner (JrCGO/IP) PPL w/62 hours Chief of safety (safety school grad) IO for major fighter mishap Multiple DG awards Lt MQ-9 Evaluator pilot and high support from Sq/WG leadership. Thanks for the inspiration on this chain.

I suppose it could be that Trump wants Greenland to be the 51st star on the American flag. I doubt that's the plan though. I don't know what he wants, but I assume it's something more mundane (new SOFA as @Prosuper pointed out, maybe some kind of mineral rights, etc). And when Trump wants to move the needle on something, but he knows he'll run into difficulty, he has a well-worn strategy: If he wants X, he proposes X2. When he knows he's going to face some kind of challenge on an issue, he proposes the most hyperbolic, most extreme version of what he wants. The media melts down and the public melts down. Whoever is on the other side of whatever the issue is, melts down as well. After all of the chaos, Trump backs down, and the other side backs down, they negotiate, and Trump often gets what he wants, or close to it. It's not even all that unique. Developers do it all the time. When they want to put up a new 10 story building, but know they're going to face a bunch of NIMBYs, they go in with plans for 20 stories, take the attacks, and eventually walk it back to the 10 story plan they wanted in the first place. I suspect that's what's happening with Greenland.

I chuckled. Sorry about the FB https://www.facebook.com/reel/1251878460121486

No it’ll say zero because it doesn’t factor in bonus entitlement you get so there is a formula we have to run based on the county the purchase is in and previous entitlement charged. If you just go off the COE then you’ll be lead to believe you have zero entitlement available

Remember when Iraq went into Kuwait? What's different now? I understand that Greenland is important but when did the USA start going after weaker countries for their goods? We typically help out the defenseless not go after their property.

Doesn't the Cert of Eligibility have the remaining entitlement? The "prior loans charged to entitlement" section, check there too. Quick and easy first inquiry.

Thanks so much!

We don’t handle assumptions and since they have to be approved directly by the VA themselves just give the VA regional loan center a call. They’ll be able to give you a definitive answer. I would guess that as long as you don’t exceed your max entitlement you’re fine to do another. Here is their number (877)827-3702

Question on multiple VA loans: Currently living in an assumed VA condo. Looking to upgrade into a house with grandiose plans of renting the condo. I didn't think I can assume another VA loan (unless they give up their entitlement) but the agent says I can and just need to stay at/under the max loan amount cap. Thoughts?

I'm in.

“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” Attributed to this piece of work. Lavrentiy Beria - Wikipedia

This cracked me up. I wish Nick was my TN state rep instead of a VA state rep. ClearedHot you can’t bring your gunship. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1413212763837365/?fs=e&fs=e

Th good thing is you don’t have to! Both is the only right answer!

You guys got a litho? Well s**t

But that is what people do, maybe they shouldn’t but force & intimidation with a mixture of the fair, unfair and semi-fair application of laws/rules/treaties is how entities that occasionally use violence to resolve disputes do things. I’m not for using one weapon on the Danes or anyone else participating in a presence and reassurance mission there for them but I am for using our leverage to get either a better status for first the USA, then the Greenlanders and ultimately for the Danes and NATO. If they can’t meet us halfway on this, then we give them fair warning that the US membership in NATO is not guaranteed. You meet us halfway and we give you X,Y,Z… Values based diplomacy/international relations is not viable in this next phase of global affairs we are in. Transactional relations with reasonable deference to civilizational values, natural rights and general respect for the natural world should be our COA going forward.

The difference is that you're a citizen of the government that is trying to use eminent domain to take your private property. This is akin to Australia wanting to buy your house; you said no, so they put pressure on your neighbors to coerce you to sell your house to the Aussies.

That entire case is complete BS and an abuse of power. I'm guessing they thought he was some anarchist dude that was a legit threat, but once they started an investigation they found out he was just into guns. Then they realized they couldn't look bad for being wrong in front of their bosses so had to press charges with what they found. There are so many random laws on the books that if you put enough of a focus on ANYONE in the United States, you'd eventually find them doing something illegal that 'justified' the investigation and could put them in jail. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. However, at the end of the day, if I have to choose between having a silencer and an SBR, I'm going with the silencer 100%. Also, silencer rules super easy compared to the SBR legal spiderweb.

And they call Miami the convicts...lol

This is a good start. I don't know if this is the place I would have started, but no matter. When it comes to defense spending, there is such a tremendous amount of giveaways, make-work, and other constructs that serve no purpose but to hand out money from Uncle Sam with no expectation of anything in return. I hope they continue along this path.

There is not a square ft on planet Earth that has not been taken from someone else by force by the current inhabitant or ancestors before. Ain’t no land belong to nobody.

Lol. Childish. You can buy the houses surrounding them and make them miserable. You can use eminent domain. You can wait for a forest fire to obliterate the neighborhood then use onerous regulations to prevent the owner from rebuilding. Pretending like the world is a libertarian playground is why Maduro lasted in our back yard for years and China became a super power using our money. That doesn't mean we storm the beaches of Greenland, but especially considering the Danish status quo is only possible through the grace of our military umbrella, if we want it, the question is not "is it for sale," the question is "how much." This is the devil's bargain Europe made 30+ years ago when they outsourced their military capacity to us. Turns out the interest on that loan is a killer.