17D_guy Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 but I don't think they forget the guns. No, but they did forget to tell the SSgt (me) who was crating their stuff through Greek security. That made for an interesting day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagasticks Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/26/oklahoma-woman-charged-with-lewd-acts-with-minor-in-tanning-booth/?intcmp=obinsite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vertigo Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 (edited) where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) http://www.foxnews.c...intcmp=obinsite Her Facebook - she's quite cute when not bawling her eyes out. Edited June 29, 2012 by Vertigo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catbox Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 where the F was this chick when i was 15?!?! (of course, er, i've never been in a tanning salon) http://www.foxnews.c...intcmp=obinsite I think we have a winner for worst Mom ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerkFE Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) I think we have a winner for worst Mom ever. I would have to rank her second to the mom of the kid that Debra LaFave was doing. I would never forgive my mom for messing that up. Edited July 1, 2012 by HerkFE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sputnik Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 This is quite possibly the worst thing I've ever read http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/07/accused_wendys_attacker_adam_l.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfargin Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M2 Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo. That's what a father here did--with his bare hands--after catching some piece of shit molesting his 4-yr-old daughter. And the grand jury refused to indict him! Another great reason to live in Texas! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Day Man Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 This is quite possibly the worst thing I've ever read http://www.oregonliv...ker_adam_l.html Mark my words...some lawyer will have a HEYDAY with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Learjetter Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 Too bad the father didn't save the state from a trial and cost of housing this douche-bag homo. That was my kid? It wouldn't have been folks holding the door shut to keep the bastard in the restroom, it woulda been the crowd barring the door to keep me from beating the sumbich to death with his own arms. And had it been in Texas, by the time the cops got there the whole crowd would've stomped him to pulp--and no one woulda seen a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 NOAA was gracious enough to issue a statement claiming that mermaids don't exist; it was a nice follow up to the CDC telling us that we don't have to worry about zombies. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/noaa-issues-statement-denying-existence-mermaids-195027537.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vertigo Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 NOAA was gracious enough to issue a statement claiming that mermaids don't exist; it was a nice follow up to the CDC telling us that we don't have to worry about zombies. http://news.yahoo.co...-195027537.html However, in Louisiana you do need to look out for the Loch Ness monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patcho Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 "Hey, you did an awesome job on that last award package...we think you should write yourself up for an award for how good you are at writing awards!" (See: Gill Robb Wilson Award ) Mind=blown (P.S. No disrespect to a guy who flew in WW I...for the French...wait, wut?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 However, in Louisiana you do need to look out for the Loch Ness monster. Looks liks Karl Rove was hired as chief of PR for ACE, NOAA, and the CDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17D_guy Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/28/us-germany-circumcision-idUSBRE85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoleIt Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 http://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. It's a snap. I take my little machine, I take your little thing. See? I put it into this little hole here, and nip the tip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 http://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muscle2002 Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it. Is my sarcasm detector INOP or are you serious? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronxbomber252 Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 I was thrilled to see this ruling. Anytime the state overturns a purely religious reason for doing something, especially what amounts to minor surgery, I'm all for it. Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer are purely religious reasons? Not to mention the fact that doctors say that if it is going to be done, the earlier the better. Plus roughly 2/3 of american males are circumcised and yet the there is no evidence of it causing any problems (emotional or physical) except when done improperly (which is medical malpractice more than anything). Are you going to tell me that you think that 2/3 of american males are either Jewish or Muslim? Because saying this is purely a religious practice implies exactly that! Add to this, the fact that it is an important religious ceremony in some major religions that causes no harm and some medical benefits. I have to side with the Jews and Muslims on this one, not to mention multiple christian groups in the area who are against this ruling and the christians don't even believe it to be a religious necessity. this is a blatant stomp on religious freedom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
338skybolt Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer... That's opinion, not fact: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/statement03.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 Cops raid a marijuana dispensary that's legally allowed to operate, per the state. Officers smash the shop's security camera, ostensibly to hide evidence of the event. http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Long-Beach-Police-Pot-Marijuana-Shop-Raid-Arrests-Excessive-Force-Investigation-161366395.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 http://www.reuters.c...E85R1F020120628 I'll count drooling as a waiver of rights. Every generation of ze Germans just has to find a way to fuck with the Jews, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Seriously, so reduced risk of: urinary tract infections, certain STD's, and Penile Cancer are purely religious reasons? Not to mention the fact that doctors say that if it is going to be done, the earlier the better. Plus roughly 2/3 of american males are circumcised and yet the there is no evidence of it causing any problems (emotional or physical) except when done improperly (which is medical malpractice more than anything). Are you going to tell me that you think that 2/3 of american males are either Jewish or Muslim? Because saying this is purely a religious practice implies exactly that! Add to this, the fact that it is an important religious ceremony in some major religions that causes no harm and some medical benefits. I have to side with the Jews and Muslims on this one, not to mention multiple christian groups in the area who are against this ruling and the christians don't even believe it to be a religious necessity. this is a blatant stomp on religious freedom. Great. Then get it done for medical reasons, not religious ones. Hell, if the benefits are so great, let's mandate circumcision along with MMR shots. I don't agree at all that we should be cutting into infants' bodies to satisfy some mythological command from several thousand years ago. I'm really pretty happy with the decision for a few reasons, not the least of which is that it slams the door firmly shut on female circumcision, still practiced by many sects of the Muslim community. No part of this ruling said that infants can't be circumcised, or that a rabbi/mullah can't be present. It said it will only be done for medical reasons. Since you listed a whole bunch of medical reasons, I would guess there are probably a bunch of doctors willing to sign the "medical necessity" paperwork. Is my sarcasm detector INOP or are you serious? 100% serious. I love any ruling that takes rights away from various religious groups. Mostly because those religious groups are usually busy trying to take rights from other people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 http://www.duffelblog.com/2012/07/new-dod-policy-to-assign-rank-to-military-spouses/ The DoD considers assigning ranks to spouses in order to mediate conflict. (yes, it's a joke). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M2 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 http://www.duffelblo...litary-spouses/ The DoD considers assigning ranks to spouses in order to mediate conflict. (yes, it's a joke). That site has potential! Tired Of ‘Chair Force’ Nickname, Colonel Bans Chairs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now