Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, 17D_guy said:

Dept of War renaming def a good use of tax payer funds. 

I'll bite.

I get it, another renaming of a department so someone can put their name on something and say "hey, I did that!" I don't disagree this is exhausting in and of itself.

However, I think a change of mentality is needed. Everyone is telling us to prepare for war, and they're even throwing out dates. Yet, at all echelons no one seems to be acting accordingly. If that's really what we're collectively supposed to be focused on then we need to get in the right mental state.

Is a name change going to do that, no. If the name change is backed by actual action, forcing people to make decisions at all levels w.r.t that end goal, then I agree. We need to get on the same page as a military.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Chicago's last GOP mayor was in 1931, Big Jim Thomson, I enlisted in Chicago in 1980 in the southwest side Mount Greenwood where the majority of Cops and Firemen live my cousin being one of them. I went to two of High School reunions there and both times it gets worse from the economic downturn I see in the old neighborhood. The progressive politicians whose base is on the Chicago's north shore white affluent liberals keep electing even more out of touch Democrats who are running the place into the ground. I bet if Da Mayor old Richard J Daley was still alive, they would consider him a Republican. It still makes me tear up when our class president was murdered by 3 POS's from the west side because she couldn't open the safe at our local McDonalds in 79. The trigger man is still doing hard time for it, today he would have beat the rap due to the Cook County DA being hyper liberal.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
6 hours ago, 17D_guy said:

Dept of War renaming def a good use of tax payer funds. 

I know right!  Kinda of like removing all historic statues and changing the name of bases.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 7
Posted (edited)

There are more people than just Trump who have been associated with Epstein in the past.  

I saw that Cameron Diaz (dibs) is also linked to Epstein.  Where is all of the concern about her?   

https://www.wtrf.com/top-stories/epstein-list-full-list-of-names-mentioned-so-far-includes-president-trump-bill-clinton-al-gore-george-lucas-cameron-diaz-and-more/

 

 

 

Edited by Biff_T
Words are hard
Posted
3 hours ago, Negatory said:

IMG_1493.thumb.jpeg.1366182509275343f22241e1e47485bd.jpeg
Anything to distract from this. It’s almost time to reveal the aliens!

Do you really think the Biden admin sat for years on evidence Trump was criminally involved with Epstein?  
 

I don't believe there's anything to this, just another fake scandal.  But don't worry, you'll get him this time!

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted

I absolutely do. I believe Trump and many others were criminally involved. And I believe those on both sides of the aisle are connected and have enough dirt on each other.. mutually assured destruction I think it is called. 

Posted
1 hour ago, herkbier said:

I absolutely do. I believe Trump and many others were criminally involved. And I believe those on both sides of the aisle are connected and have enough dirt on each other.. mutually assured destruction I think it is called. 

For clarity, you think the Biden DOJ had proof that Trump was criminally involved with Epstein, they didn't prosecute him because of mutually assured destruction, but are now leaking because...?  If it was MAD last year, what changed?
 

If you add some details to your theory I could better understand your position.  My theory is that this is just another fake scandal, there has been nonstop hints of evidence none of which bore fruit upon close examination.  But happy to have a good faith discussion since neither of us know the truth.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, herkbier said:

I absolutely do. I believe Trump and many others were criminally involved. And I believe those on both sides of the aisle are connected and have enough dirt on each other.. mutually assured destruction I think it is called. 

campaign4.jpg

Posted

Kinda hard to have a good faith discussion, because as you point out, it’s just speculation on our parts. 
 

Good point, I don’t know what has changed to motivate leak(s). I can’t explain that. I also can’t explain the Trump Admin bragging they are going to expose everything and now seemingly doing their best to say it’s a nothing burger. 
 

All I can be certain of: there is corruption and rot. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...