September 10, 20241 yr On 9/9/2024 at 4:50 PM, Sua Sponte said: Name? Jacob Thornburg https://www.mcconnell.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2003302230/
September 11, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, StoleIt said: Jacob Thornburg https://www.mcconnell.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2003302230/ His LinkedIn still shows him as the Deputy of McConnell.
September 12, 20241 yr 15 hours ago, Biff_T said: Please say his call sign is GRETA. HOW DARE YOU!!!!
November 8, 20241 yr Oops... https://x.com/TaskandPurpose/status/1854722364895834495https://taskandpurpose.com/news/air-force-fires-commander-nuclear-missile/ https://x.com/TaskandPurpose/status/1854722364895834495 Edited November 8, 20241 yr by gearhog
November 13, 20241 yr From the WSJ this morning: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/trump-draft-executive-order-would-create-board-to-purge-generals-7ebaa606?st=Y7Njyd&reflink=article_copyURL_share I can think of a former AFSOC Sith Lord and his padawan that should be on the list. Edited November 13, 20241 yr by MexicanHouseRULZ
November 13, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, MexicanHouseRULZ said: From the WSJ this morning: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/trump-draft-executive-order-would-create-board-to-purge-generals-7ebaa606?st=Y7Njyd&reflink=article_copyURL_share I can think of a former AFSOC Sith Lord and his padawan that should be on the list. From your lips to gods ears!
November 13, 20241 yr My brain has two points of view on this: First and foremost, any leadership involved specifically in the Afghanistan withdrawal should be keelhauled, then fired, and exempted from any mil-industrial complex jobs. Second, the concept of subjective and politically based "purging general officer leaders" should induce shivers and revulsion from anyone who has studied history. This will be messy.
November 13, 20241 yr Potentially a great thing. Could be a renaissance for defense leadership and mission focus. A witch hunt is equally possible, leading to a brain-drain that will take a generation to repair.
November 13, 20241 yr “The warrior board would be made up of retired generals and noncommissioned officers” retired chiefs get to plat too?
November 14, 20241 yr 8 hours ago, arg said: “The warrior board would be made up of retired generals and noncommissioned officers” retired chiefs get to plat too? Wouldn't most of the ones that retired recently be focused on reflective belts?
November 14, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, FourFans said: Wouldn't most of the ones that retired recently be focused on reflective belts? There's no such thing as a chief that polices reflective belts without generals who tolerate such behavior. Anyways, witch hunt or not, you can't inflict this amount of rapid change without a tremendous amount of pain. Rip the bandaid off.
November 14, 20241 yr I know a retired General Officer who has already been approached about being on the board.
November 14, 20241 yr 20 minutes ago, ClearedHot said: I know a retired General Officer who has already been approached about being on the board. me too. General Chang.
November 14, 20241 yr You can only say his name 1 more time before he shows upSent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
December 11, 2024Dec 11 OK, it's Army, but dayyyyum!! Army Secretary Fires Four-Star General for Promotion Board Meddling Perhaps a sign of things to come (STS) based on Trump's EO for a "Warrior Board" to purge GOs!
December 11, 2024Dec 11 1 hour ago, M2 said: OK, it's Army, but dayyyyum!! Army Secretary Fires Four-Star General for Promotion Board Meddling Perhaps a sign of things to come (STS) based on Trump's EO for a "Warrior Board" to purge GOs! Slife has to be pissing his panties.
December 11, 2024Dec 11 2 hours ago, M2 said: OK, it's Army, but dayyyyum!! Army Secretary Fires Four-Star General for Promotion Board Meddling Perhaps a sign of things to come (STS) based on Trump's EO for a "Warrior Board" to purge GOs! One down, many more to go!
December 12, 2024Dec 12 On 11/15/2024 at 10:11 PM, FourFans said: who? @General Chang? Somebody rang?
December 12, 2024Dec 12 On 12/11/2024 at 8:52 AM, ClearedHot said: Slife has to be pissing his panties. I was honestly surprised when his name didn’t show up on the woke purge list. https://nypost.com/2024/12/04/us-news/conservative-watchdog-compiles-list-of-woke-ideologues-in-military-for-pete-hegseth-to-purge/
December 14, 2024Dec 14 On 12/12/2024 at 1:49 PM, HU&W said: I was honestly surprised when his name didn’t show up on the woke purge list. https://nypost.com/2024/12/04/us-news/conservative-watchdog-compiles-list-of-woke-ideologues-in-military-for-pete-hegseth-to-purge/ Stunned he is not on the list, hope they keep digging.
December 14, 2024Dec 14 The first 15 seconds alone of that are, as the kids say, cringe. Know your fucking people, eh?
December 16, 2024Dec 16 Some in the Army are starting to get it! More than Half of Senior Army Officers Are Turning Down Command Consideration U.S. Army Col. Christopher J. Kirkpatrick receives the Joint Multinational Readiness Center colors from Brig. Gen. Steven P. Carpenter during a Change of Command Ceremony near Hohenfels, Germany, Aug. 16, 2024. (Staff Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army photo) More than half of the Army's senior officers are turning down opportunities to command, choosing instead the stability of staff roles over the high-stakes demands of leadership, or retiring, according to internal service data. The Battalion Command Assessment Program, or BCAP, a cornerstone of the Army's effort to evaluate leadership readiness, assesses 800 to 1,000 lieutenant colonels annually through interviews, psychological tests and physical fitness evaluations. Historically, 85% of those participants have been deemed fit for command. Yet this year, 54% of eligible officers voluntarily chose not to participate -- a significant uptick from the 40% average opt-out rate seen since 2019. "The predominant reasons were personal and family circumstances, such as retirement eligibility and family stabilization," Maj. Heba Bullock, an Army spokesperson, told Military.com in a statement. The rank of lieutenant colonel carries unique prestige, offering officers the chance to command units of roughly 1,000 troops and to play pivotal roles in Pentagon plans for preparing forces for war. The position sits at the intersection of the Defense Department's big picture and the daily life of rank-and-file troops. But while a command position is extremely high-profile, it also comes with endless work hours. Instead, some officers are drawn to staff positions -- less-visible, lower-pressure roles that promise stability for the same pay. Those jobs lack the excitement of leading troops but offer something many midcareer officers might crave: a break from the relentless grind of command. In other cases, lieutenant colonels are reaching the retirement mark of 20 years and have to decide whether they're going to seek the rank of general or retire. However, it was unclear what drove the recent spike in senior officers walking away from potential command opportunities. The command selection process itself has recently become mired in scandal. Gen. Charles Hamilton, the former head of Army Materiel Command, was fired this week after he inappropriately intervened in the BCAP evaluation process for a subordinate who had been deemed unfit for command and ranked among the lowest-performing candidates in her cohort. Against Army policy, Hamilton arranged an unheard-of second evaluation, which the officer also failed. Nevertheless, she was included on a list of candidates approved for command -- an action ultimately signed off on by Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George. Following investigative reporting by Military.com in March, the officer was immediately removed from the command list, and Hamilton was just relieved of his duties and fired. Reactions within the Army are divided over whether the credibility of the BCAP has been undermined by the recent controversy. Critics interviewed by Military.com, including some general officers, argue that the incident reveals systemic vulnerabilities in BCAP, with one senior official describing it as susceptible to favoritism. They contend that the subsequent accountability -- highlighted by Hamilton's firing after media reports brought the issue to light -- occurred only due to external pressure. Others, however, point to Army Secretary Christine Wormuth's swift and decisive response as evidence that BCAP's integrity remains intact. By addressing the scandal quickly and removing the officer from the command list, they argue, the service demonstrated its commitment to maintaining a fair and rigorous selection process. Beyond the controversy, deeper structural challenges may be at play. Separate internal Army reports cite work-life balance concerns and scheduling conflicts as significant factors influencing career decisions at the lieutenant colonel and sergeant first class ranks. At those midcareer stages, troops often face the dual pressures of heightened professional responsibilities and the demands of raising families. As soldiers rise in the ranks, so do concerns over their spouses' careers, an issue that peaks at lieutenant colonel. Families have long raised concerns that the constant pressures of military life, including unpredictable schedules, long-term missions and the generally rural locations of many installations, make it difficult for spouses to build their careers. Access to child care has also emerged as a pressing issue, with military-run facilities facing space shortages and civilian day care costs soaring. Those logistical hurdles further complicate the decision-making calculus for officers weighing the rigors of command against the relative stability of staff roles.
Create an account or sign in to comment