brickhistory Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Covid lab leak Russia collusion Hunter laptop etc, etc, etc Perhaps there's reason to be skeptical 1 5
HeloDude Posted March 25 Posted March 25 22 minutes ago, Banzai said: How about this, let’s take a hypothetical stance that there is totally not enough evidence to believe this is anything other than a fake news smear job. If it comes out as true - which the truth will come out when the reporter is called to testify - will you oppose and denounce the actions taken if targets and timing and/or other classified information were shared? Do you believe Tulsi Gabbard when she said that nothing classified was shared in the texts?
Banzai Posted March 25 Posted March 25 20 minutes ago, HeloDude said: Do you believe Tulsi Gabbard when she said that nothing classified was shared in the texts? I do not remember and do not recall. 1
HeloDude Posted March 25 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, Banzai said: I do not remember and do not recall. Simple question, do you believe Tulsi wrt her quote below: “I can attest to the fact that there were not classified or intelligence equities that were included in that chat group at any time.” https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna197954
Banzai Posted March 25 Posted March 25 (edited) I do not recall the definition of classified information. But I am glad that she said that there was no classified information. I look forward to having the SSCI validate her statement and reassure the public. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5212821-atlantic-editor-suggests-hes-open-to-sharing-hegseths-full-war-plans-texts-publicly/ Edited March 25 by Banzai
brickhistory Posted March 25 Posted March 25 14 minutes ago, Banzai said: I do not recall the definition of classified information. Dafuq? I admit I was not looking for the bridge, so that's on me...
uhhello Posted March 25 Posted March 25 (edited) This seems really easy to get to the bottom of. Reporter officially turns over the screen shots if he hasn't already done so. Govt confirms that operational plans yet to happen were in them or they weren't. Longer it goes the longer it's likely its being blown out of proportion or was done intentionally. Disregard the tweet wording. Just watch the video. Edited March 25 by uhhello 1
SHFP Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Mission was a success. And through out the Vietnam War, the French, bitter from their defeat there because we did not give any assistance to them holding their Colonies in SEA did everything to get back at the US. Their Embassy in North Vietnam shared our Target(s) Strike Packages to the NVA. Several friends were lost or ended in the Hilton. And I still believe “Bombs on Target, the rest is BS”.
jonlbs Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/ “This leaks” Edited March 26 by jonlbs
Smokin Posted March 26 Posted March 26 That's bad. Worst part is that it was the person that should have known the best about what was ok and not ok to talk about in an unclassified environment. And let all the anti-Trumpers here take note that we are calling a spade a spade even when it hurts 'our team'. 1
Pooter Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Denying it while knowing full well the journalist has the receipts might be the wildest part. Like how do your teams not come up with a better damage control strategy 2 2
chase Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Oof I don’t get it. Fire the person responsible. Admit you messed up. Move on. NOW, after denying and lying about it, they basically need to start a war to make this go away.
Day Man Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) who could've seen this coming Edited March 26 by Day Man 2 3
17D_guy Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) Link to all so far. I'm ok with him not releasing the active Intel portions, but I know some on this board won't agree . https://imgur.com/a/breaking-below-is-entire-transcript-of-messages-from-signal-group-chat-just-released-by-jeffrey-goldberg-atlantic-hkD7Cdm Edit - much like the tweet above, the title sucks. Edited March 26 by 17D_guy
ClearedHot Posted March 26 Posted March 26 36 minutes ago, Day Man said: who could've seen this coming Right... 1
LookieRookie Posted March 26 Posted March 26 The doubling down on nothing being classified is insane. 5
uhhello Posted March 26 Posted March 26 As more comes out, it's bad. Leaves me wondering why? Why the details. It almost sounds like bragging. Sounds like something a junior NCO would do. There was no reason for it. He's the secdef, just say 'we're going to hit them'. The level of detail is gloating. Most of those people in the group don't know what any of that shit is anyways. 1
BashiChuni Posted March 26 Posted March 26 5 minutes ago, uhhello said: As more comes out, it's bad. Leaves me wondering why? Why the details. It almost sounds like bragging. Sounds like something a junior NCO would do. There was no reason for it. He's the secdef, just say 'we're going to hit them'. The level of detail is gloating. Most of those people in the group don't know what any of that shit is anyways. Agreed. “Check out this cool shit” type of talk. Completely unnecessary and the players in that chat had zero need to know. 1
waveshaper Posted March 26 Posted March 26 29 minutes ago, LookieRookie said: The doubling down on nothing being classified is insane. My guess is that the blow-by-blow info on this Operation was originally being transmitted to the SECDEF by the COCOM CC via a SCIF/Secure Network and was in fact appropriately marked/designated "Highly Classified/TS/SCI/etc): It sounds like the SEFDEF might have officially screwed the pooch. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now