Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Majestik Møøse said:

They’ve since apologized for the mistake and corrected it.

Good for them, actually happy to see them owning the mistake instead of just deleting it with no mention 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
They must have forgot that Coast Guard tankers are painted white and orange. It's a common error. 
They also both float on blue surfaces...so practically indistinguishable.

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

https://www.laughlin.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2334934/enlisted-graduate-of-pilot-training-next-instructs-at-laughlin/fbclid/IwAR2u-gd8M2q6XbyoNQObkzu4j6Wch0LWKdRnG6UILbWI-yX_jQ6VlCvlPP0/
 

Feel like this belongs here. First I’ve heard of it. 
 

seems like the first writing on the wall for the Air Force refusing to fix their problems on the pilot side. 

Edited by Ryder1587
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, BashiChuni said:

“I value the job I have now because it gives me the opportunity to pass on the knowledge I have as a military aviator"

 

wut

Persons under duress are often are forced to give propaganda messages

Edited by Clark Griswold
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Ryder1587 said:

https://www.laughlin.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2334934/enlisted-graduate-of-pilot-training-next-instructs-at-laughlin/fbclid/IwAR2u-gd8M2q6XbyoNQObkzu4j6Wch0LWKdRnG6UILbWI-yX_jQ6VlCvlPP0/
 

Feel like this belongs here. First I’ve heard of it. 
 

seems like the first writing on the wall for the Air Force refusing to fix their problems on the pilot side. 

Just pathetic.  What a kick to the junk.  

Posted

PTN is not real pilot training.  Nothing stopping Ops Sq/CCs from keeping PTN wonders in MR training till they prove themselves to standards.  Sucks for the graduates as many probably didn’t ask for this but this business shouldn’t  GAF about feelings.  

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Clark Griswold said:

Persons under duress are often are forced to give propaganda messages

true. i dont blame him for talking to PA

its a good individual accomplishment actually. but in the bigger picture its blah

Posted
4 hours ago, dream big said:

T-1 phase III is not real pilot training.  Nothing stopping Ops Sq/CCs from keeping T-1 wonders in MR training till they prove themselves to standards.  Sucks for the graduates as many probably didn’t ask for this but this business shouldn’t  GAF about feelings.  

See how that works?

Posted



 Nothing stopping Ops Sq/CCs from keeping (NEW COPILOTS) in MR training till they prove themselves to standards.


Fixed it for you.
Posted
2 hours ago, jazzdude said:


 

 


Fixed it for you.

 

I'm not even sure what anyone's point is right now? Do I just need another beer? 

Posted
10 hours ago, dream big said:

What?  Zero comparison 

I wonder what people in the 90s said about T-1 training when everyone had only gone through T-38s.

 

The point is, pilot training changes.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Whoa sparky, calm down. The linked story literally had nothing in it calling out a conspiracy, even going so far as to say it was due purely to “inattention.” I think the point of posting it was that even the commander in chief’s office made one of the same mistakes that pisses off a lot of Air Force pilots. How can we hold orgs like PA to a higher standard if the CiC’s office does the same thing? Also, I’m positive this would have been linked if Biden or Clinton had done it.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 4
Posted

In other news...

https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/air-force-association/2020/09/14/the-air-force-launched-a-new-eseries-aircraft-designation-the-internet-had-questions/

Quote

Aircraft, satellites and other weapons that are designed using digital engineering will be designated as part of the Air Force’s new “eSeries” and receive the prefix “e," Air Force Secretary Barbara Barrett announced Monday.

The move is mean to “inspire companies to embrace the possibilities embraced by digital engineering,” Barrett said during a Sept. 14 speech at the Air Force Association’s Air, Space and Cyber conference.

Service leaders — including Barrett and Air Force acquisition exec Will Roper — see digital engineering as a key enabler to reduce the cost and time needed to develop new weapon systems, using virtual modeling and simulation tools to design and test the product before a physical prototype is produced.

Boeing’s T-7A Red Hawk trainer jet will be the first aircraft to receive the new eSeries designator, Barrett said.

“The eT-7 is just the first in our vision of a long line of e-planes and e-sats,” she said. “For 73 years, the entire history of the Air Force, X-planes have represented technological innovation. Today, the e-plane and e-sat will join them in making history and ensuring airmen and space professionals have modern tools to protect our nation.”

...

The service also noted that the "e" designator is temporary and that “the program office will request the aircraft mission design series update to drop [the] 'e' [designator]” once the program moves into production, Stefanek said.

Isn't this exactly what the "X" and "Y" MDS prefixes were? Just call it a YT-7 and be done. This seems like pandering to innovation with a few more buzzwords thrown in.

  • Upvote 1
Posted



Isn't this exactly what the "X" and "Y" MDS prefixes were? Just call it a YT-7 and be done. This seems like pandering to innovation with a few more buzzwords thrown in.


What confusing is that the "E" prefix already was in use for aircraft and has been for a while.
Posted
2 hours ago, dream big said:

What’s your fucking point? This was already posted a while back in reference to mortuary affairs, the original source of the patch.  Classic PA mixup but in true leftist media fashion blow it up into some Trump conspiracy. 

My point right now is you might need to go smoke a joint bro 😂 

image.png.94710df1ed2dbb450209943d90b4c1f9.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted





What confusing is that the "E" prefix already was in use for aircraft and has been for a while.

They made it fancy and new...I believe the intent is to use a lower case e...nailed it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...