All Activity
- Past hour
-
I think what the post intended was to show that Trump/acolytes/Fox News Talking Heads beat the anti war drum very hard and very loud. He railed against the deep state war hawks and vowed The Purge. MAGA ate it up. Some on here did too. The irony was just pointed out. The response, but but but Joe, and Hillary, and that one dude. UKR. I have always advocated to support them against our mortal enemy, Putin. And many I know did too, up until Trump didn't. Then all I heard from them were Fox talking points on waste of $$, blah, blah, blah. Maybe Trump has learned. Back to reality. I'm guessing most here would acknowledge that a nuclear Iran is very bad and the US might have had to do something about it. Call it a realist view of the world, weather you're True MAGA, wear the hat to piss off your lib aunt, classic R, Libertarian, Dem, Progressive Dem, or full Libtard. Israel did the world a favor, but they didn't have everything they need to finish the job. Trump was likely asked by them to bust the deep shafts wide open with his Midnight penetrator by making a hole and then exploding deep inside. And without lube. 𤣠Back to reality. Now comes the tough part. Are we done? Is a coalition put together to take Iran out of the bad guy world and on a path the likes of WWII Germany and Japan? Is that even possible? And who? And how? Or do we leave it to Israel?
-
I have a mental picture of Maverick turning to Rooster asking what was "The second video ever played on MTV" right before weapons release. I heard Trivial Pursuit is popular way to pass the time on long missions.š«”
- Today
-
Helps to have 180,000 pounds to throw at a problem.
-
Props to the targeteers as well - thatās a difficult problem to solve, and they crushed it (pun intended). And to the TWAC dude at WIC (blanking on name right now) - I hope youāve survived the 30hr erection this brought on!
-
When both Star Wars and Top Gun 2 called it. š
-
Gavin106 joined the community
-
If you zoom in, you can see they are dump trucks. Not likely to be transporting uranium around but not impossible. Other theory is they were adding earth to the access points to impede the strikes that they knew were coming eventually. If they were transporting material out, you can imagine those were the most tracked vehicles in recent history by most anyone with the means to do it.
-
https://www.foxnews.com/us/armed-gunman-shot-dead-after-opening-fire-sunday-church-service Churches and schools are some of the places most often legislated to be gun free and most often are the places of a shooting. Good thing this church thought differently. Luck is no substitution for a defensive plan. If anyone in your church protests against an armed defense, tell them to read Nehemiah.
-
CH, what do you have on this? Edit To Add: For anyone else who was busy doing other shit today: -Satellite imagery shows a shitload of trucks outside Fordow Thursday/Friday timeframe. -IAEA says no indication of increased radioactivity post strike at the various sites. -US officially can't confirm the whereabouts of the nuclear stockpile of 60% material. Take all that for whatever it's worth...
-
Iām not saying regime change but Iām just saying empowered disaffected minority groups who are sick of of oppressive corrupt theocrats like pallets of AK-47s, claymores, IED kits, drones and RPGs dropped from the sky https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/6/20/a-simple-visual-guide-to-iran-and-its-people When you have your enemy on the ropes, donāt stop Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
In 1988 Iran tried to close the Straight with mines. One USN vessel was damaged. The next day President Reagan ordered an attack on Iran the sank exactly half of Irans Navy. When we have a President with cajones we donāt have put up with shit from tin pot dictators. I have to admit that all the expert tariff economist online are now saying that they have irrefutable bomb damage assessment from multiple 30,000 pound weapons that designated 100s of feet underground. Come on pull the other one.
-
A version of Nuclear Sharing is a possibility. We do it, Russia/Belarus do it, the old Soviet Union did it and take a look at the Pakistan/Saudi Arabia arrangements. Nuclear sharing - Wikipedia
-
Israel might. But not in a good way...
- Yesterday
-
Lol. No. Maybe North Korea thinks about it. Maybe. Nobody else with nukes is giving them to Iran
-
Exactly. I expect a big part of the strategy has been "allowing" the political class in Iran to survive specifically so they can choose their own lives over retaliation. But they can't not make threats. That's not how international politics work. They are going to saber rattle, the real question is will they follow through. We'll know soon.
-
-
Springer, looks like a great place to live. š³
-
Yeah and 45% of Chinese oil goes thru there as well
-
If they block Sunni oil nationsā¦.i see a coalition forming against the regime. 25% of the global supply flows through the straight
-
Curious how Iranian response will be impacted by the Israeli HVI campaign against them. It can't be easy adjust strategy, C2 forces & simultaneously worry about assassination.
-
Sadly it looks like it is going to spiral...Iranian Parliament approved the closure of the Straight of Hormuz. Additionally, the Iranian Nuke sites were not completely destroyed and they possibly moved the nuclear material. Finally, there are indicators the Iranians are planning an attack on U.S. bases in the region.
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-leader-claims-multiple-countries-prepped-provide-iran-nuclear-weapons-following-us-strikes Welp, this is getting more interesting
-
What happened to those on here who said āanything that weakens are enemy is a good thingā?ā¦or does this only apply to Russia?