Jump to content

737 MAX


MilitaryToFinance

Recommended Posts

There is also an issue with the engine anti-ice. The LEAP engine nacelle lip uses more composite materials than the legacy nacelles and can catastrophically fail if the anti-ice is left on in dry conditions for more than five minutes! The AD warns this could result in “an un-powered off-field landing”!

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/10/2023-17197/airworthiness-directives-the-boeing-company-airplanes

Edited by HeyEng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also an issue with the engine anti-ice. The LEAP engine nacelle lip uses more composite materials than the legacy nacelles and can catastrophically fail if the anti-ice is left on in dry conditions for more than five minutes! The AD warns this could result in “an un-powered off-field landing”!
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/10/2023-17197/airworthiness-directives-the-boeing-company-airplanes

Yeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker.
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SurelySerious said:


Yeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker.

 

2 hours ago, HossHarris said:

Yup. Nobody ever forgets to turn it off ….

Lol, exactly. Forgetting to turn off the anti-ice for 5 minutes and you get a total engine failure? That's the definition of a "real shocker."

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SurelySerious said:


Yeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker.

And of course anti-ice valves never stick in the open position! 
Boeing has auto anti-ice systems that automatically turn on and off during icing conditions but to maintain the same type rating as legacy 737 aircraft, these type of systems are not installed on the Max.
The Max with the LEAP engines should have had a new type certificate but Southwest would have not have purchased the aircraft to begin with and so Boeing did a lot of pounding a square peg in a round hole to emulate handling characteristics of legacy 737.

Even the NG had a different wing and cruised faster than the 100 to 600 aircraft and it could be argued that Boeing should have changed the type certification back then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
2 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Good.  Maybe we can actually hold  Boeing accountable for making pieces of shit both for the USAF and civilian world.  Monopolies are not good for competition and and definitely not good for making end products that are safe and effective vs. a product that constantly needs more work to function as advertised.   

Fuck Boeing.  They are not as good as they think they are.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

a6ZwBeq_700bwp.webp

If it ain't Boeing, it ain't going....to make it through the flight without losing a part.  

Edited by Biff_T
Fat fingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Anyone have more details?

The AvHerald is reporting that on May 25, 2024, a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-8 MAX (N8825Q) experienced Dutch Roll while en route from Phoenix to Oakland, carrying 175 passengers and 6 crew.
The crew regained control and landed safely in Oakland. Post-flight inspections revealed substantial structural damage, including to the standby power control unit (PCU) and its mounts, leading the FAA to classify the incident as an accident and open an investigation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Anyone have more details?

The AvHerald is reporting that on May 25, 2024, a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-8 MAX (N8825Q) experienced Dutch Roll while en route from Phoenix to Oakland, carrying 175 passengers and 6 crew.
The crew regained control and landed safely in Oakland. Post-flight inspections revealed substantial structural damage, including to the standby power control unit (PCU) and its mounts, leading the FAA to classify the incident as an accident and open an investigation.

Not this one specifically, but UAL had a rudder issue recently. Culprit was a disabled, but still installed rudder servo.

Here is the explanation from the link below.

The incident airplane was delivered to the airline in February 2023. The aircraft was configured with "a rudder SVO-730 rollout guidance servo that was disabled per UAL’s delivery requirements to reconfigure the autoflight system from CAT IIIB to CAT IIIA capability."  Investigators stated that although the servo was disabled, it remained mechanically connected to the upper portion of the aft rudder input torque tube by the servo’s output crank arm and pushrod. The rollout guidance servo was removed from the incident airplane and subjected to cold soaking to determine if the cold had adversely affected the torque required to move the servo’s output crank arm.  Per the report, at room temperature it was found that the torque to rotate the servo’s output crank arm was within design specifications.  After the unit was then “cold soaked” for one hour and the test was repeated, it was found that the torque to move the servo’s output crank arm was significantly beyond the specified design limits.  "Because the servo output crank arm is mechanically connected to the rudder input torque tube, the restricted movement of the servo’s output crank arm would prevent the rudder pedals from moving as observed during Flight 1539 and the test flight," the report said.

https://www.flyingmag.com/ntsb-investigates-boeing-rudder-malfunction-incident-in-newark/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...