All Activity

Whatever you posted is not working for me, here is the direct link to the FAA. https://registry.faa.gov/TypeRatings/

Articles like this are a little exhausting. It's a bunch of innuendo and reports from "anonymous sources." And pulls most of it's content from "MS Now," which I guess is the reincarnation of MSNBC? Very little of it has actual, verifiable facts. Just breathless reporting of "Patel is in full panic mode! Patel is paranoid!" etc.

The funny part is you know there are people out there looking at those pictures saying "See! I told you they were real, look at that!"

Nah, but is that you Tupac!?

This photo is irrefutable evidence that aliens exist…….

Let’s start with the definition of propaganda: “ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause.” Whose cause are they furthering and whose cause are they attempting to damage? There are easy, obvious answers to those questions. Additionally, it is written and curated to push a narrative that Iran has dealt significant blows to the US, the US has been decently hurt/licking its wounds, etc. That implied narrative is not accurate at all. There is also some 100% false stuff in it - but obviously nobody is confirming that publicly due to classification/opsec. Overall, the narrative is very misleading at best, and actually full up false in some instances (but, I won’t say the false parts are purposeful, as a journalist/think tank talking out their ass is nothing new). There’s the right, patriotic thing to do, and then there’s this bullshit. The fact you can’t see the difference is not surprising, but still disappointing.

Frontier jet kills someone walking on the runway during takeoff roll.

Out of town but will measure a few when I get home, thanks! Great idea, thank you.

Someone writing something you don’t like doesn’t make it propaganda. Someone writing something anti administration doesn’t make it propaganda. Nor does it make it morally wrong. As Teddy Roosevelt said, Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official, save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. You probably are also initially upset that the NYT has correctly ID’d Chinese perceptions that the US are making poor strategic choices. Like expending half of our cruise missile inventory. archive.isChina Sees a ‘Giant With a Limp’ as U.S. Drains Weapons o...I’d reassess. It is a fact that the American people - who live in a democratic republic - deserve to know what their country is doing and have a right to impact that course. As a reminder, the Iran war is at a -20 point net favorability in this country. It is not the duty of the media to propagandize every state action and return favorability. That’s what happens in North Korea and Iran. I’d also reflect and realize that you have no counters at all to the factuality of the articles. You just attack that they exist - precisely because you can’t point out how they are wrong. It is the mark of someone who does not have a valid counter argument to devolve to calling something they don’t like propaganda. War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, eh?

Having been to all the DOW PME and a stint at the Harvard Fellowship I have seen a lot of different techniques for evaluating adversary intentions and motivations. When it comes to China I am a fan of NOT thinking like an American. Yes we can read On War and The Art of War but I prefer to place myself in their shoes and contemplate motivations. China is a unique case and this is how I describe it to others. Imagine there was another Civil War in America...We the winners, fought the "bad" guys all the way across the country to California where they jumped in boats and went to Hawaii where they took over. We didn't have the ships to take it back....would there be ANY doubt that Hawaii is ours? And if a peer adversary stepped in to support the people that took Hawaii how would we view it? That is exactly what happened with Taiwan. So all of that to say, yes, war IS THE PLAN, and they believe they are fully justified in doing so. Getting over 60% of the world's semiconductors and over 90% of the most advanced chips is just icing on the cake.

The question I'm beginning to ponder: Is a China instigated war scarier with Xi at the helm, or whomever comes after him? Imagine a world in a year or so where Xi is no longer in power, and China still decides to go to war... Echos of Russia turning into the USSR, or possibly France's revolution turning into a Napoleon led war machine...

It seriously feels like about every 18-24 months or so over the past decade DC spouts off with "UFOs are real, shiny object, look over here!"

Please. We Need To Move This Thread Along

This one. Zero stars. Do not recommend. IYKYK Definitely not the child. You're a little weird bro.

This is just from headlines, but if Trump is declaring victory, did we get all the nuke material that was the justification for this little adventure? Are we taking assets worth 25B plus costs of our destroyed structures/craft? Are we taking a billion per life lost and giving it to the families?

Quick, more people post. We need the page to flip so we don't have to see Noem's Bra Dude anymore.

The FBI deserves better leadership. I hope they get it soon. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15801763/Kash-Patel-forced-polygraph-tests-dozen-staff-paranoia-grips-FBI-chief.html

KEND 26-10AU T-38 x7 T-6C Vietnam T-6 FAIP EA-37 DM KC-46 Altus x5 KC-46 McConnell AFRC KC-135 Altus C-130H Bradley ANGB C-17 Travis AFRC C-21 Scott C-130H Peoria ANGB 26-10AM (Last T-1 drop ever) C-5 Travis AFRC KC-135 Andrews KC-135 UT Guard KC-135 Selfridge ANGB KC-135 Grissom KC-46 Pease Guard C-130H Cheyenne WY Guard C-17 Altus 26-10AF T-38 FAIP F-16 Bulgaria F-16 OK Guard F-16 Holloman F-35 WI Guard F-15E SJ F-22 Langley

Yep, "war." I usually phrase it thusly: China is one of the only countries in the history of humanity to have a significantly higher portion of males than females. They've incinerated the family savings of hundreds of millions of families by building towers that will never be occupied. And they have a youth unemployment problem. There is nothing more dangerous to a society than a bunch of unwed, unemployed young men. Do you know of any ways a totalitarian regime can unburden themselves of a bunch of revolutionary excess males? I don't think war is a risk for China, I think it's the plan. The only silver lining is that China's ~25 million excess males are offset by India vs ~45 million. And they aren't too crazy about each other.

Where's the WaPo article about the incredible effectiveness of the US airstrikes? I wonder if we destroyed any fuel bladders.

Accountability is one thing. We all want that. Scraping tooth and nail to find every single thing to make America look as bad as possible and manipulating information to do so is a whole different ball game. That is what enemies do.