All Activity

https://www.twz.com/air/russia-testing-shotgun-armed-yak-52-trainer-aircraft-to-down-ukrainian-drones

Every time I walk by her caricature at KLIT, I hope someone has added horns and a Hitler stash to her fucking mug on the wall.

Trash Panda. There, feel better? 😁

He won't

No DIBS!

What level will he get retirement for?

I hear she smells like sulphur...

Evil demon Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

Well, I guess that’s one [emoji640]-star pension that DoD won’t have to pay. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

Can you imagine if this bitter old @unt had been elected. Now she thinks only a DNC female can be POTUS.

Not fired because now retired, but still in a world of self-induced sh1t: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/retired-four-star-us-admiral-convicted-on-corruption-charges/ar-AA1F53M2?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=16dacbfb21d24cd397e8bb219d52d4e7&ei=14

Only if POTUS can zip line thru the ramp from a 747 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He will infil via HALO to all future events. When his feet touch the ground, he'll light up a Marlboro red.

This might be racist?

There is a massive gulf of use between being naked on the ground and where you are considering strike capable ISR. The ground commander owns his/her scheme of protection, and we are increasingly empowering them for a host of reasons to be capable of that on their own. 1. Your service is taking JTACs away, so that’s helpful. 2. The democratization of effective weapons to provide that overhead search and strike particularly while mobile is increasing every day. 3. Sometimes I want protection and recon security to do just that and not get sucked into strike. That was one of the primary reasons we didn’t arm group 3 ISR when the question was there. It’s why Apache is a terrible recon platform. It’s also why there is an argument to maintain the 19 series because Infantry sees every thing as a nail when we have them the recon security tasks and drones to perform them. What you should have said is any time we have troops on the ground there should be an effective fires/strike capacity to achieve immediate overmatch with the expected threats. Same reason we make those guys truck a Javelin and mortars around when we know we can probably get air if we scream loud enough on the net. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Some of you guys have never been around Rangers and it shows… It wasn’t a gunnery until Dave chased you around the sleep area doing the “would you ____ me” tuck. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We were doing an iron swap and happen to be going to the same place that a "team" (6? dudes) needed to get to, so we loaded up their ISU90 with "you don't want to know what's in there" and headed to the ME. Load announces on initial climb out, "Yo, you ain't gonna believe this, dudes are stripped down to speedos and are playing some form of tag, oh wait, shit dog, there's a swinging dick. Dudes are nuts, I now I can't unsee nuts. I guess its some form of strip tag?" The play by play had us rolling to tears. LM had a calling in standup.

And since Trump likes a show, tactical arrivals and departures. Maybe pickle off some flares. Oh, and airshow smoke. And sparklers! And big ass speakers blaring Ride of the Valkyries. Oh, and he better pimp that ride. Wheel well LEDs, spinners, etc.

I find the irony quite thic with Tapper and his book, "exposing" the Biden decline when he was fully a player in it. He's spinning his part. As for who was running the nation, imo, it was the primary gatekeepers, Jill and Chief/Dep of Staff and a few read-in die hard staffers.

It's amazing to watch how Democrats who get red pilled are ostracized by the true believers. It's like leaving a cult.

Jake Tapper declares Biden White House lied about 'cheap fakes' after CNN peddled narrative in 2024 Wait, the mainstream media was in on it...and now they admit it as if it was nothing! main.mp4

Sure, but still kind of a red herring for the situation. Saw it all the time - armed assets available for ODAs, but dipshits somewhere decide not to for zero valid reason. Employed weapons more than once after I proactively moved my “do nothing” XCAS container to another one because I talked to the guys night prior and found out their JTARs were denied. The ASOC actually got mad after they caught on because I was not “letting them do their job of managing air assets.” Similar type of level 69 dumbasssery with Niger, Benghazi, etc. etc.

Yea, I said that. " If you can have a massive stack with gunships that'd be great, but these guys couldn't get it. Of course if you can only get unarmed aircraft to support you: something is better than nothing" The context of my statement in this year old thread had nothing to do with strat vs tac ISR or what asset is best, and that's not a subject I'm interested in.

Bit of a false dilemma because your two options are tactical and strategic ISR. The U2 has adapted to tactical ISR but it was not designed as such, so it obviously cannot carry weapons. To you point, the answer is obvious, but the greater answer is simply having someone overhead is better than none.

You're responding to a post about the Niger ambush where they needed armed ISR to say the U2 can do cool things without being armed.... ok? Can you tell me where I asserted ISR had to be armed to be effective? Or where I suggested one asset could do it all? You seem to be projecting onto my statements rather than reading words, and doing so absent context of the discussion. for clarity: if American citizens are on the ground in danger and ISR is overhead anyway, it should be armed in order to PROTECT OUR PEOPLE. If you can have a massive stack with gunships that'd be great, but these guys couldn't get it. Of course if you can only get unarmed aircraft to support you: something is better than nothing. But in Niger the embassy made a decision to take weapons off aircraft providing tactical ISR to these teams despite the host country asking for it. This was a political decision for optics, similar to the Marines guarding their barracks in Lebanon being forced to take loaded magazines out of their weapons. I can't believe I have to explain this to somebody who's been around a while. To summarize-- If your kids were in an ODA working sources in enemy territory with an ambush imminent and could only get 1 aircraft assigned to them, would you rather have a U2 or armed ISR? The answer is obvious; I'm not disrespecting anybody else's platforms or jobs or usefulness, but the answer in that situation is obvious and this discussion is silly.