O Face Posted September 7 Share Posted September 7 1 hour ago, Biff_T said: On another note. Take a look at Clooney's face in this scene. She just crop dusted him and he loved it. 😆 HAHA! I didn’t notice anyone else was in the room, but that is a case of pinkeye that I’d be super proud of. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sim Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 Quote According to the whistleblower, at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the Team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The seventh member of the Team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe COVID-19 originated through zoonosis. The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position. https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-09/CIA Whistleblower on COVID origins 9.12.23.pdf Not sure if this belongs in WTF thread or this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FourFans Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 You guys smell that? Smells like documents burning... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted September 13 Share Posted September 13 19 hours ago, Sim said: https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-09/CIA Whistleblower on COVID origins 9.12.23.pdf Not sure if this belongs in WTF thread or this one. JFK was right about the CIA… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gearhog Posted October 6 Share Posted October 6 I recently met an AF 0-5 who is a party to a class action lawsuit along with Hoppe. Please consider signing this petition. Thanks. https://x.com/jhippityhoppe/status/1710119097952788572?s=46 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 God damn did this Covid narrative absolutely collapse. You Covid freaks are backpedaling so fast! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark1 Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 3 hours ago, BashiChuni said: God damn did this Covid narrative absolutely collapse. You Covid freaks are backpedaling so fast! While ironically acknowledging my stupidity for bothering to engage you on this...your stupidity is tiresome. When a person is infected by a SARS virus they have an immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body. When a person is vaccinated against a SARS virus they have [functionally] the same immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body. Sound familiar? The difference being that they are not also under threat of a replicating virus that can overwhelm the body's ability to defend itself. It's no surprise to thinking people that the same increase in risk of cardiac inflammation that comes with infection also comes with vaccination. It would be surprising if that was not the case given that, from the immune system's perspective, vaccination is indistinguishable from infection (with a few links in the response chain bypassed by mRNA). The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection. And the answer is yes...by orders of magnitude. Thankfully the people employed to come to these conclusions are typically not exceptionally vulnerable to tribal group-think conspiracy movements, and they base their conclusions on reality. You may now return to wasting your life away by willfully sifting through all the wrong information in order to find the next trump-card that isn't a trump-card. 1 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 all well in good smart guy HOWEVER that's not the bill of goods you and the "experts" sold us. you and your covid freaks look like the stupid ones now my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 25 minutes ago, Mark1 said: The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection. that was NOT the question during peak covid hysteria. the demand was you MUST take the vax REGARDLESS of any risk/reward calculation. people were fired from jobs and lives were ruined due to your stupidity. a little humility is the right answer for you and your ilk, but like a fool you will double down. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 41 minutes ago, Mark1 said: The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection. And the answer is yes...by orders of magnitude. Thankfully the people employed to come to these conclusions are typically not exceptionally vulnerable to tribal group-think conspiracy movements, and they base their conclusions on reality. The vaccine for COVID-19 does not stop transmission. This is not disputed at any level. It reduces it somewhat, but only if you are susceptible to infection in the first place, which teenagers and young adults are not. The concept of herd immunity never involved low-risk demographics increasing their exposure to negative outcomes to protect high-risk demographics. That's an insane proposition. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrizzell Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 The vaccine for COVID-19 does not stop transmission. This is not disputed at any level. It reduces it somewhat, but only if you are susceptible to infection in the first place, which teenagers and young adults are not. The concept of herd immunity never involved low-risk demographics increasing their exposure to negative outcomes to protect high-risk demographics. That's an insane proposition.Its mind boggling after three years of having COVID in our life’s, that there are still people clinging to the vaccine as being beneficial. It was rushed to market by Big Pharma to make them BILLIONS. It wasn’t about saving anyone Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 2 minutes ago, jrizzell said: Its mind boggling after three years of having COVID in our life’s, that there are still people clinging to the vaccine as being beneficial. It was rushed to market by Big Pharma to make them BILLIONS. It wasn’t about saving anyone Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app That's not true. Very at-risk groups, such as those over 70-80, had a very, very high chance of surviving the vaccine, and a not-great chance of surviving covid. Especially if fat. For them it was a no-brainer. What's mind boggling to me is how effective the current corporatist-governmental establishment has "team-ified" so effectively that Americans are now seemingly incapable of seeing anything that doesn't completely inspire their political opposition. The vaccine, especially for the alpha and Delta variants, absolutely reduced serious illness and death from covid-19. It was also rushed into production, had real and meaningful side effects for certain demographics, was misrepresented by the people and organizations that stood to profit from it most, and treated a disease that was almost certainly developed in a Chinese lab, and accidentally released. Making the vaccine mandatory was immoral because it was new, unproven, and effective in a way that did not benefit from compulsory distribution. Not because it didn't do anything at all. 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrizzell Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 Not because it didn't do anything at all. I didn’t mean to imply it didn’t do anything at all. But it was rushed to market to make Big Pharma record breaking profits. When you own the government organization who’s supposed to provide oversight, your money based incentive mindset drives your actions. If you trust Pfizer, I’d watch Dopesick, or read the book. They care about one thing, money. The end users are unimportant, when they know they have immunity from vaccine injuries. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperMan Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 10 hours ago, Mark1 said: While ironically acknowledging my stupidity for bothering to engage you on this...your stupidity is tiresome. When a person is infected by a SARS virus they have an immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body. When a person is vaccinated against a SARS virus they have [functionally] the same immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body. Sound familiar? The difference being that they are not also under threat of a replicating virus that can overwhelm the body's ability to defend itself. It's no surprise to thinking people that the same increase in risk of cardiac inflammation that comes with infection also comes with vaccination. It would be surprising if that was not the case given that, from the immune system's perspective, vaccination is indistinguishable from infection (with a few links in the response chain bypassed by mRNA). The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection. And the answer is yes...by orders of magnitude. Thankfully the people employed to come to these conclusions are typically not exceptionally vulnerable to tribal group-think conspiracy movements, and they base their conclusions on reality. You may now return to wasting your life away by willfully sifting through all the wrong information in order to find the next trump-card that isn't a trump-card. Most of what you said was true, buuuuuuuut it's also wholly irrelevant. Since the vaccine doesn't stop transmission, it's not anyone's business whether or not you decide to take it. This is a free country, and that means people get to make decisions for themselves, both good and bad. Think about your logic for 2 seconds dude. The vaccine was forced on all of us, and yet everyone got exposed anyway. Read that last part over and over until it sinks in. 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swizzle Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 58 minutes ago, ViperMan said: Most of what you said was true, buuuuuuuut it's also wholly irrelevant. Since the vaccine doesn't stop transmission, it's not anyone's business whether or not you decide to take it. This is a free country, and that means people get to make decisions for themselves, both good and bad. Think about your logic for 2 seconds dude. The vaccine was forced on all of us, and yet everyone got exposed anyway. Read that last part over and over until it sinks in. And we hobbled our youngs' (i.e. the future, the warfighters) hearts under forced injections for the old with co-morbidities in society....great long term play, very cheap in the long term? healthier plan?! - no, More lethal effective fighting force - no, More control - yes, less freedom - no. So, C19-vaxxers-at-large, was it worth the inoculation mandates? Was it right to subdue? To succumb to fear? Whole thing was oppressive... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tac airlifter Posted October 17 Share Posted October 17 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted October 29 Share Posted October 29 “Experts urge” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted October 29 Share Posted October 29 Meanwhile in TV land they’re still pushing this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted October 29 Share Posted October 29 12 hours ago, BashiChuni said: Meanwhile in TV land they’re still pushing this "You too can smile like your pooper is being impaled by a giant rod". - Pfizer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted November 23 Share Posted November 23 https://nypost.com/2023/11/22/news/army-invites-back-soldiers-discharged-for-refusing-covid-vaccine/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McJay Pilot Posted November 25 Share Posted November 25 On 11/23/2023 at 12:30 AM, BashiChuni said: https://nypost.com/2023/11/22/news/army-invites-back-soldiers-discharged-for-refusing-covid-vaccine Baby come back, any kind of fool could see There was something in everything about you Baby come back, yeah, you can blame it all on me 'Cause I was wrong, and I just can't live without you 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sim Posted November 26 Share Posted November 26 On 11/22/2023 at 11:30 PM, BashiChuni said: https://nypost.com/2023/11/22/news/army-invites-back-soldiers-discharged-for-refusing-covid-vaccine/ https://dailycaller.com/2023/11/21/exclusive-air-force-begs-troops-booted-covid-19-vax-come-back/ Air Force is doing same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCO Posted November 26 Share Posted November 26 16 hours ago, McJay Pilot said: Baby come back, any kind of fool could see There was something in everything about you Baby come back, yeah, you can blame it all on me 'Cause I was wrong, and I just can't live without you Aren’t they inviting them back because it was congressionally mandated they invite them back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now