Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Baseops Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, RASH said:

It wasn't that long ago (ok, 25 years) we were logging 10-15 hours a week...

And ridiculing those nations who flew only 10-15 hours a month. 

  • Replies 726
  • Views 279.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Holy hell, maybe it’s the 4.5 hours I just spent in an ejection seat and only spent 15 seconds upside down but F-ck me!!!! Us old salty sport b-tching bastards have complained so much we have UPT bou

  • I taught your mom all about apotheosis.

  • Nah, it’s totally Congress’ fault that I spend 40 hours a week on OPRs, awards, decs, making trackers, making trackers to track the trackers, making slides, staff meetings, responding to every single

Posted Images

Can’t run to the airlines if they can’t fly on Active Duty... kinda liking cutting off your nose to spite your face.

10 hours ago, Jaded said:

True, but includes both downrange sorties and RPA flying. Not joking. 

If so that’s scarry. Unit dependent but the average RPA MCE line guy is logging between 20-40 hours a week (or more) depending on unit/manning.   

1 hour ago, Guardian said:

I didn’t think they logged any flying hours.....I kid I kid.

Airlines don’t count them, so, you are not wrong. 

I’m confused, are we upset that some of us are only getting 17 hours a month (or less/ barely staying proficient due to random exec or wing job); or cynical because some of us that were lucky* to stay in the flying squadron are actually flying 3 times a week? 

On 3/2/2018 at 8:48 AM, RASH said:

It wasn't that long ago (ok, 25 years) we were logging 10-15 hours a week...

 

On 3/2/2018 at 11:03 AM, SurelySerious said:

And ridiculing those nations who flew only 10-15 hours a month. 

 

4 hours ago, dream big said:

I’m confused, are we upset that some of us are only getting 17 hours a month (or less/ barely staying proficient due to random exec or wing job); or cynical because some of us that were lucky* to stay in the flying squadron are actually flying 3 times a week? 

 I thought the sentiment was it’s probably not a good thing for the overall airmanship, proficiency, and lethality of our force that we’re down to such low flying hours. Did no one else a while back sit there thinking, “wow, they must be really bad,” when we used to read about how other countries were flying the similar amount of hours to what was mentioned? If your airframe has viable sims for training, I’ll buy some trade off there; I would also venture to say that the reality is just reduced flying related activity, though. 

Spoke with an old f-100 pilot who said back in his day they sometimes needed waivers to fly 90 hours a month.

Back when pilot main duties were flying.

Hell, I’ve been waived above 120 hours per month downrange several times between 2010 and 2013...obviously different than home station steady-state, but we always seemed to fight the Global War in Hours with gusto where I grew up. While in operational squadrons bar napkin math says my average hours were a little over 30 per month over a 5 years span.

At the end of my AD time as an instructor with heavier shop responsibilities, unfortunately I was sometimes trying to fly less at home station just to keep the machine running, and it sucks that that felt necessary. The problem was that shop work doesn’t always shrink when flying hours grow, you just end up working more.

I agree though that monthly flying below a certain threshold is bad. Would love to see shredouts that break that one big average being thrown around down by MWS, unit, rank, crew position, etc.

Edited by nsplayr

14 hours ago, dream big said:

I’m confused, are we upset that some of us are only getting 17 hours a month (or less/ barely staying proficient due to random exec or wing job); or cynical because some of us that were lucky* to stay in the flying squadron are actually flying 3 times a week? 

They screwed the numbers to make it look good, when we know it isn't.  

I had 47 hours one year when farmed-out to a "fly-once-a-week" support job. Typically local training sorties were 4 hours. You do the math...

9 hours ago, nsplayr said:

Hell, I’ve been waived above 120 hours per month downrange several times between 2010 and 2013...obviously different than home station steady-state, but we always seemed to fight the Global War in Hours with gusto where I grew up. While in operational squadrons bar napkin math says my average hours were a little over 30 per month over a 5 years span.

At the end of my AD time as an instructor with heavier shop responsibilities, unfortunately I was sometimes trying to fly less at home station just to keep the machine running, and it sucks that that felt necessary. The problem was that shop work doesn’t always shrink when flying hours grow, you just end up working more.

I agree though that monthly flying below a certain threshold is bad. Would love to see shredouts that break that one big average being thrown around down by MWS, unit, rank, crew position, etc.

U-28’s are definitely an outlier in this discussion. I remember when sequestration hit and we didn’t slow down one iota. That’s not even counting the PC-12 flying that we have trouble filling the lines sometimes because crew availability is tough to pair against available tails.

 

For the academy grads:
 
a·poth·e·o·sis
əˌpäTHēˈōsəs/
noun
 
  1. the highest point in the development of something; culmination or climax.
On 3/7/2018 at 8:48 PM, joe1234 said:

Air Force management has finally achieved its apotheosis in incompetence when it has both a massive pilot shortage and a shortage of hours flown by the pilots it does have.

At this point they should just change the Air Force song to Yakety Sax and give all the planes back to the Army.

 

FBEC25BC-CA34-4AA5-A12A-ABDED3E4054E.gif

Part II - https://warontherocks.com/2018/03/air-force-in-crisis-part-ii-how-did-we-get-here/
How was leadership allowed to let this happen?  I've never seen the damage put together so clearly.


Simply poor leadership. While the Captains back in the day we’re talking about this the leadership was busy with Blues Monday, green boots, SAPR, morale sweeps of squadron bars etc.
9 hours ago, 17D_guy said:

Part II - https://warontherocks.com/2018/03/air-force-in-crisis-part-ii-how-did-we-get-here/

How was leadership allowed to let this happen?  I've never seen the damage put together so clearly.

Agreed.  This dude nicely summarizes thousands of angry Internet rants.  I’m hopeful the clowns in charge read and heed, but doubt they will.

One of the crisis managers on Facebook posted that they just revised their projections this week - AFPC has determined that they need to up production from 1400 pilots to 2000 pilots per year.

They produced 1200 last year.

7 minutes ago, Jaded said:

One of the crisis managers on Facebook posted that they just revised their projections this week - AFPC has determined that they need to up production from 1400 pilots to 2000 pilots per year.

They produced 1200 last year.

No sweat. They're cutting the T-6 syllabus by approx. 13 hrs, changing Phase 1 and 2 to a Navy style syllabus, and eliminating sorties/requirements and other training from the -38 side all to up the production. Should have plenty of "qualified" pilots on their way to the CAF in no time! 

2 hours ago, Boomer6 said:

No sweat. They're cutting the T-6 syllabus by approx. 13 hrs, changing Phase 1 and 2 to a Navy style syllabus, and eliminating sorties/requirements and other training from the -38 side all to up the production. Should have plenty of "qualified" pilots on their way to the CAF in no time! 

This guy was also asking how people would feel if students went directly from the T-6 to C-130 units. You know, since they both have propellers.

4 hours ago, Jaded said:

This guy was also asking how people would feel if students went directly from the T-6 to C-130 units. You know, since they both have propellers.

The one on TPN?  The idiocy of that dude's question almost baited me into a response.  I really wonder if the people coming up with these ideas are actually pilots.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.