Harpy Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 On November 18, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Ram said: Avoid DLI if you can, especially the 314TRS. Go to DLI-East if you have the option. Really? Last I checked that's still in Monterey, must be terrible... Could be in Cannon or Altus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 If you want to be a 34 year old O-4 getting treated like a pipeline airman fresh out of Lackland, be my guest. However, if given the option, go to DLI East for language. But yeah, Monterey is nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach braff Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Ram and Harpy - the DLI situation changes with commanders methinks. I was there - same sq (314th) - 2012-2013 and it was the most big-boy training I have ever participated in. No crazy uniform rules other than the AETC mandated blues Monday (I wore ABUs all other times, pilot classmates wore flightsuits). I went through 2 Sq/CCs with the 314th and their only real requirement for the officer students was to stay out of trouble, pass your tests (or see them if you were having trouble so they could go to bat for you), and enjoy the student life. O's would help out with some of the first-term airmen events from time to time, but it was typically voluntary unless mandated by higher powers. I can count on one hand the amount of times I was mandated to do something outside of schoolwork and basic AF requirements (PT test, dental appt, etc) during my ~18 months there. Ram's experience with the squadron sounds like a complete 180 from what my pals and I experienced - I'm sorry it sucked. Get another cool CC in there and I'll bet it becomes super again. The language stuff will remain hard though. zb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slackline Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Ram and Harpy - the DLI situation changes with commanders methinks. I was there - same sq (314th) - 2012-2013 and it was the most big-boy training I have ever participated in. No crazy uniform rules other than the AETC mandated blues Monday (I wore ABUs all other times, pilot classmates wore flightsuits). I went through 2 Sq/CCs with the 314th and their only real requirement for the officer students was to stay out of trouble, pass your tests (or see them if you were having trouble so they could go to bat for you), and enjoy the student life. O's would help out with some of the first-term airmen events from time to time, but it was typically voluntary unless mandated by higher powers. I can count on one hand the amount of times I was mandated to do something outside of schoolwork and basic AF requirements (PT test, dental appt, etc) during my ~18 months there. Ram's experience with the squadron sounds like a complete 180 from what my pals and I experienced - I'm sorry it sucked. Get another cool CC in there and I'll bet it becomes super again. The language stuff will remain hard though. zb There in 2011, and I had a similar, if not more relaxed atmosphere. Never even wore blues. If go back in a heartbeat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epsilon Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 I did DLI-East in Washington. Private school 2 blocks from the white house. 1 on 1 instruction. Drank coffee and chatted for 4-5 hours. Never wore uniform the entire time. Best assignment I've had in the AF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosuper Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 (edited) I guess this will be a new CBT for the more sensitive AF members. https://youtu.be/Sz0o9clVQu8 Edited December 11, 2015 by Prosuper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted December 11, 2015 Share Posted December 11, 2015 I guess this will be a new CBT for the more sensitive AF members. https://youtu.be/Sz0o9clVQu8 That's way too effective and frank (ok, and we know they don't understand satire) to be used by the Air Force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosuper Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 I wonder if a 4 star's who pass on will be included in this, I'll be dead so I wont give a shit but it will be a slap in the face to my family. Maybe they could get the funds to honor by dropping a few bands, TIB, and General officers quarters remodel. http://wjhl.com/2015/12/15/21-gun-salute-eliminated-from-air-force-funerals-due-to-lack-of-funding-personnel/?utm_content=bufferaef77&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperWSO Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 The AF can't afford the personnel, but I'm sure M2 would be glad to empty a magazine at a funeral. Its not a 21 gun, just one gun 30 times. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATIS Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Stay on the left/VA side of that Virgina/DC line with that 30-rounder M2...just sayin. ATIS...wondering where his 30-rounders might be??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panchbarnes Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 (edited) USAF/AETC leaders missed multiple opportunities to do the right things regarding the 2011 315 TRS investigation. The learning lessons from the "dark ages" are far more valuable than any SAPR, GreenDot, NoFear Act, Suicide Prevention training (yes it's all applicable here). Leadership loses all credibility when they sweep these incidents under the rug. Part of the reasons why Airmen are jumping ship and do not care about your In-Res PME, promotion, bonuses, and toxic leadership "opportunities." https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/4k67em/goodfellow_finally_releases_2011_command_directed/ Excerpts: "First off, thanks to the OP for getting this report. I kinda already knew what was in it, but I'm glad that it's seeing the light of day. I'm hoping the individual interviews are released at some point in the near future, as well. I was part of the cadre there for most of the first year of Rolirad's tenure. Quinene showed up later as the flight commander of the officer course. I don't have much bad to say about Lt Col Rolirad; I didn't necessarily agree with some of the things she did, but I understand what she was trying to do. I never personally saw her do any of the things she was accused of. Quinene, on the other hand, is a sexual predator of the first order. I've heard variations on the same stories: how if female 14N students wanted a good assignment, they had to sleep with him; how he'd go in and "hook" a female student briefing because she wouldn't sleep with him; how he reinstated a female student back into a class after she had washed out because she was sleeping with him; how he was sleeping with an enlisted instructor; so on and so forth. Now, I admit, I have no first-hand knowledge of this. But with this much smoke, there had to be a fire. And I'm not sure he only did this at Goodfellow. I was talking to an intel officer who knew him in Korea. This person said Quinene wanted to borrow his car so that he could go pick up some SrA for a "date." And, as this thread alludes to, justice was never really truly served. After his DO tenure, Quinene went to the Marine Corps Staff College in Quantico, a pretty prestigious gig for an Air Force guy. This investigation went down while he was there, so he ended up on admin hold in the DC for a while. I figured he was there until the investigation was completed and the court-martial proceedings could begin. Nope, instead he got sent to the CAOC for a year. That's right, instead of being prosecuted, HE GOT SENT TO BE IN CHARGE OF SOME OF THE SAME LIEUTENANTS AND CAPTAINS HE HAD TERRORIZING AND ASSAULTING 18 MONTHS BEFORE!!! The small bit of justice that was actually done was that, after his deployment, he was assigned to HQ AETC (where, presumably, senior leaders could keep an eye on him). He ended up getting passed over for promotion and had to get out before he was retirement eligible. Last I heard he was in the San Antonio area. He had been working for some local politician, but I'm not sure if that's still the case. As you can probably tell, I feel pretty passionate about this. I can't tell you how many times I've told people that I was an instructor during this time and they ask, "So what was the deal?" The damage that Quinene (and to a lesser extent, Rolirad) did to the Air Force intelligence community will felt for years to come. How many good ISR students (and staff) were totally soured by their experience and bailed at the first opportunity? Worse still, how many of them left GAFB thinking that sort of behavior was OK? So, if any victims are out there reading this, I'm sorry that we, as a staff, didn't do more to protect you. Five years later and it still bothers me." "Finally "we" get to see 30% of the story acknowledged by the AF. I was there for 1.5 years of the terror. The report is missing a vast amount of information. It only addresses infractions against officer students (which I'm not downplaying, all of their complaints are 100% valid; the rape case is also missing). Enlisted students suffered greatly, office-instructors suffered greatly, and enlisted-instructors suffered greatly. Yes, their tenure at the 315 TRS is known as the dark ages to all those who experienced it. In my 19 year AF career I've never personally experienced/witnessed anything like the horror show Karen Rolirad and David Quinene put on. The crazy part is I was never a direct victim of their wrath; but I feel it weighing heavy on my soul to this day. I am guilty of the bystander effect. I saw the transgressions but did not take requisite action. I do not believe it would've done any good given the mountains of IG complaints by other instructors; but that is no excuse, it was my duty. I failed at my duty. I own that. I have to live with that. My inputs may have turned the tide. If you have ever been victim to a toxic leader, a truly toxic leader, it is something that is not easy to cope with; even 5 years after the fact. I saw many peers, friends, and students (officer & enlisted) belittled, unjustly punished, careers destroyed, career altering decisions made, near suicides, etc because of Rodirad and Quinene's dark rule of fear, intimidation, and bullying. I'm not sure what's worse. The fact there are officers like these two in an American military or the fact that they are allowed to get away with it. Where is the courts-martial? TIs at Lackland get prison, as they should. If you're Rolirad (who repeatedly violated several UCMJ articles and USCs) you get to retire honorably and get a job for the city of San Antonio as an AF liaison. I do not profess to know all the reasons why there are morale issues in the AF, but I can certainly attest that the lack of accountability in the officer corps (O-5+) and SNCO corps is a contributing factor." Edited June 8, 2016 by panchbarnes 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panchbarnes Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 (edited) Redacted CDI report in its entirety released...It's only a glimpse of how toxic it was. And from one of the Facebook comments: " Can't agree more. As an Captain Reservist, I hated seeing my 2d Lt classmates talk about how this is how the Air Force works, that you had to suck up and party with the Patch in order to get a good assignment. A newly divorced, highly inappropriate Patch I may add. Rolirad encouraged and covered up for him and the rest of the rotten instructors. There were only a few good instructors, and they were enlsited or civilian." Responsive Records.pdf Edited June 11, 2016 by panchbarnes Full report is out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marlboro BLACK Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--Hoverboard-could-derail-BU-grads-Air-Force-career-hopes-383195741.html Looks like ROTC Captains seem to have a lot of time on their hands these days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Rumor has it that this kid is a giant douche who had a history. This was just the last straw... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 1 hour ago, Ram said: Rumor has it that this kid is a giant douche who had a history. This was just the last straw... Maybe they should have documented some of the history, instead of threatening to wash a kid out for riding one of these admittedly ridiculous hoverboard contraptions. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herkbum Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 Well it sounds like someone at Eglin may soon be able to shed light on this dude. If he's a douchebag now, he's unlikely to change very quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperWSO Posted June 18, 2016 Share Posted June 18, 2016 5 hours ago, herkbum said: Well it sounds like someone at Eglin may soon be able to shed light on this dude. If he's a douchebag now, he's unlikely to change very quickly. ... But now he is 2Lt Douchebag! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuggyU2 Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Why is any of this relevant... to anything? A 2Lt that's unpopular with the status quo. Newsworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKinnear Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 (edited) The Pentagon's plan to hire military leaders off the street The shoe clerkery has gone full retard. WOs, oh hell no; but O-6 hired off the street is acceptable? WTFO... EDIT: yes it's more of a DoD issue, than just AF specific. I really hope this is just polite consideration since Carter is name dropped in the article and not serious. Edited June 19, 2016 by GKinnear background Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Um, why is that a bad idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Let's take people with zero miltary experience and start them as Group Commanders, what could possibly go wrong? There is a much better fix mentioned in the article: filling these hard to fill spots with GS personnel. That solves the pay issue and mitigates the lack of military experience by keeping them out of uniform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 I guess I don't understand how opening up leadership positions to a bigger pool is a bad idea. If a civilian wants to be the mission support group commander, I say let him or her interview against whatever O-6 was "groomed" for that position. I think this organization would be improved with some outsider perspectives in positions of authority. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedevil Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 The military is not a profit maximizing entity. It will never run like one because it's a part of the insanely bureaucratic gov't. I'm all for hiring some intelligent and successful dudes off the street but they simply won't be able to achieve anything without systematic change throughout the DoD. Until big blue realizes how powerless a Sq or even a Gp CC is, nothing will change. Although maybe bringing these dudes in and watching them spin their wheels for two years will shed light on that fact... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKinnear Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 1 hour ago, Jaded said: Um, why is that a bad idea? Two quick thoughts 1) We have to remember that our ultimate "end product" is to lead Airmen in combat. IMO, the assumptions that DoD leadership is basing that idea on is one of a peace-time, business model. It seems like they think that any goober an come in and order troops to their death to take some random hill. If it is primarily to stand-up a Cyber MAJCOM, or other specialty fields, GS and contractors already fit that bill. Or create another professional Corps (JAG/Medical/Chaplain). 17Ds are already LAF guys, it'd be a slippery slope until the direct commission is opened up wide. It's a disconnect between the civilian/military leaders. It's been stated before, this is just another example. 2) On the basis that it fly's in the face of Big Blue's insistence that in-res grads from IDE are the "chosen ones", maybe it's not so bad. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted June 19, 2016 Share Posted June 19, 2016 Fair enough. I guess I've just seen a lot more of group commanders sitting in meeting after useless meeting, and not a lot of ordering troops to their death. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now