Lawman Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 KCHS has (had) Key Spouses parking spots at the commissary. Ft Carson has spots for Housing mayors and family members of POWs.... And they are closer to it than the "expectant mother" spots which is just funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitteEinBit Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 I might be able to understand parking spots at a busy work place....but spots at the commissary or BX where the person MIGHT go once a week is beyond ridiculous. Is anyone really that fucking lazy to walk the extra 50m from a parking spot in the back? I mean, didn't those guys make their rank based off their excellent PT scores anyway? It is about as funny as those front row parking spots at the gym people will sit and wait for instead of just walking the extra distance. YOU'RE GOING TO THE FUCKING GYM!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butters Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 http://www.spi.dod.mil/ewizard_down.htm - DoD produced Java encryption tool - approved for download on DoD or personal computers. Run it, encrypt the roster with a password, then email the encrypted file to your email and decrypt it on your laptop. Longer process but decent workaround. There is a better work around... if anyone cares. Being on an Army network I have issues with sending Encrypted emails all the time since they use a different GAL. Solution, if the individual sends you a digitally signed email you can select the certificate, click on "details" and then "Trust the Certificate". You will then be able to send encrypted to that individual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 There is a better work around... if anyone cares. Being on an Army network I have issues with sending Encrypted emails all the time since they use a different GAL. Solution, if the individual sends you a digitally signed email you can select the certificate, click on "details" and then "Trust the Certificate". You will then be able to send encrypted to that individual. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSCguy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 The enlisted promotion system is incredibly screwed up. Because it's all career field specific it's possible that some doofus with a 28 on the asvab can make chief just because he's a cop but wouldn't even be allowed into tech school in a bunch of other afscs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one1 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 There are horrible people that study their asses off and score 90s on both tests and get promoted. It really is a horrible system. Since everyone gets 5s on their EPR and everyone has relatively the same amount medals, the only way to get promoted is to do awesome on the tests, rack up TIG points, or by being a big enough kiss ass to get step promoted. The most fucked up part about step promotions, they usually go to someone that has been stuck at TSgt forever and doesn't do well at testing. They very rarely give it to people based solely on merit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyFastLiveSlow Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 PII fix question...if I print it as a PDF and password protect it, can it be read by the cyber dorks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertschu Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 PII fix question...if I print it as a PDF and password protect it, can it be read by the cyber dorks? 1) Print your document 2) Staple a PII coversheet over it 3) Place the document with coversheet in scanner 4) Email the scanned coversheet. You should be good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntledemployee Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 1) Print your document 2) Staple a PII coversheet over it 3) Place the document with coversheet in scanner 4) Email the scanned coversheet. You should be good. Try these: https://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/coversheets.pdf I heard they're extremely effective. Out 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitteEinBit Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Yeah, TPS cover sheets...I knew they would come along eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cell Dweller Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 1) Print your document 2) Staple a PII coversheet over it 3) Place the document with coversheet in scanner 4) Email the scanned coversheet. You should be good. Works every time. Also remember to scan in the highest resolution possible and e-mail it to the greatest number of people possible. Don't want any white space on the e-mail exchange server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JarheadBoom Posted April 26, 2014 Share Posted April 26, 2014 Try these: https://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/coversheets.pdf I heard they're extremely effective. Out Nice... they added some new ones since the last time I looked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFsock Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 ProTip: When I need to send PII shit out of the .mil domain I just log into my gmail, draft a message, then attach the file. I don't send it, but I can still access the draft and any attachments from anywhere I have access to gmail. So you're the guy that got gmail blocked on NIPR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 So you're the guy that got gmail blocked on NIPR. I know it varies by base, but many have www.gmail.com blocked, but mail.google.com is not. You know, because I'm sure Google is less secure than our cracker jack assembly of 1990s-era websites. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawman Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 I know it varies by base, but many have www.gmail.com blocked, but mail.google.com is not. You know, because I'm sure Google is less secure than our cracker jack assembly of 1990s-era websites. Remembers in the 90s when people were making awful websites on Geocities and Tripod.... Those people work for the DOD now. Which is why it takes 9 months to get a SIPR token in he Army. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 Remembers in the 90s when people were making awful websites on Geocities and Tripod.... Haha, I would die if they put the rotating, flaming email gif on the portal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panchbarnes Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 (edited) Remembers in the 90s when people were making awful websites on Geocities and Tripod.... Those people work for the DOD now. Which is why it takes 9 months to get a SIPR token in he Army. At least the simple HTML pages were much easier to navigate than the new AF portal maze. It's like trying to solve a puzzle every time I log-in to get something done. Edited April 28, 2014 by PanchBarnes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimuth Posted April 28, 2014 Share Posted April 28, 2014 (edited) A C-17 FTU IP retired the other day. This was a pretty good list of things he learned in the USAF, which he showed at his retirement. Edited April 28, 2014 by Azimuth 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC5Wes Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Todays National Commision on the Air Force hearing is now online.http://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/14-04-29-national-commission-on-the-structure-of-the-air-force Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panchbarnes Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 Gen Welsh's "initial feedback" to the commanders... http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/484930/csaf-provides WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- All supervisors are required to provide subordinates with an initial feedback, outlining expectations, standards and goals they can both work together to achieve. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III led the way by introducing the new Air Force Instruction 1-2 “Commander’s Responsibilities” May 8 for commanders Air Force-wide. AFI 1-2 is a six-page document that details the general’s priorities and expectations for those officers who hold command positions. Topics range from conduct and responsibilities to Welsh’s overall intent New AFI here: http://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/csaf/afi1_2.pdf Good on Gen Welsh for trying to hold commanders accountable, but it's kind of sad after spending tons of $$ on PME we still need a new AFI to tell people how to lead the right way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimuth Posted May 21, 2014 Share Posted May 21, 2014 No, the sad part is that some commanders still won't lead correctly, even with an AFI telling them what's expected out of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollow Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 No, the sad part is that some commanders still won't lead correctly, even with an AFI telling them what's expected out of them. agree. the horrible commanders will continue to be horrible and purposefully disregard this AFI. maybe the ones that are new/in over their heads could get something out of it? that's probably too hopeful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-21.Pilot Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Worst commander I have ever had: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jrtwiford This, IMHO, is what is wrong with the AF. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Worst commander I have ever had: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jrtwiford This, IMHO, is what is wrong with the AF. Do tell why..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10percenttruth Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Sounds a bit pompous & impressed by his own resume, but that describes 90% of the fluff profiles on LinkedIn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now