BashiChuni Posted yesterday at 12:32 AM Posted yesterday at 12:32 AM 8 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: A friendly reminder to any airline pilots here, if you look out the window and see someone approaching the plane when they shouldn't be, just shut the engines down. The passengers will survive the 30 seconds of darkness as you wait for the Apu to come online, and aside from saving a life, you may be saving a whole lot of people a whole lot of trauma from seeing something most people can't handle seeing. agree, but point of order in that video it'd be hard to even see that guy from the cockpit 1
uhhello Posted yesterday at 01:07 AM Posted yesterday at 01:07 AM 34 minutes ago, BashiChuni said: agree, but point of order in that video it'd be hard to even see that guy from the cockpit Looks like they had just pushed back too so were probably heads in getting started
Lord Ratner Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM 1 hour ago, BashiChuni said: agree, but point of order in that video it'd be hard to even see that guy from the cockpit Completely possible, and either way it's not the pilots' fault when some dipshit jumps into the engine. But there's been a couple of these incidents in the past year, and historically every few years. It's not always some psychopath trying to commit suicide, sometimes it's an IQ-80 ramper. And it could have just as easily been one of the people who was chasing that guy who didn't realize how powerful an engine is only to get sucked in while trying to stop that guy from killing himself. In any and all cases, if people are around the engines and they're not supposed to be, shutting them down risks very little and potentially saves a life. 1
FourFans Posted yesterday at 03:24 AM Posted yesterday at 03:24 AM (edited) 1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said: Completely possible What aircraft do you fly? 4 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: And I have to ask again, exactly what fucking point are you making? You're just going to keep him running cuz "maybe we'll get to depart anyways?" Literally no one here is saying they should have continued. We're saying that this happened so fast and most likely outside the view of the pilots that by the time they saw anything they could not have reacted fast enough. Most likely is that the pilots were completely dependent on comms from the ground/ops/or plugged in ground crew while this was happening You are making wild inferences. Stop being a spaz. Edited yesterday at 03:31 AM by FourFans
SocialD Posted yesterday at 03:39 AM Posted yesterday at 03:39 AM 2 hours ago, BashiChuni said: agree, but point of order in that video it'd be hard to even see that guy from the cockpit Ya, no way I'd see that guy. We can't even see our wingtips on the 717. Besides, dude would have to jump pretty high to get into our engines. One night in Afghanistan, I had a guy walk from the nose of the F-16, down the right side and go between the inlet and the wing tank. I was looking the other way and only caught him out of the corner of my eye when my crew chief started yelling WTF. He was already in a safe area before I could shut it down. Apparently a big lip Block 30 doesn't have as much suck (sts) as they say. As a former crew chief, I can't fathom what made this dude do that. We had a very one-sided conversation later.
disgruntledemployee Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM 10 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: Christ, are you this obnoxious in real life? Back at cha. Biff says adios and you get in my grill over this? Dude dove in. He was a gonner regardless of crew actions, including trying the shut the engines down if they saw him. Sorry Biff, but dude got triggered by me for some reason and not anyone else, so calling it out. 1
Pooter Posted yesterday at 04:29 AM Posted yesterday at 04:29 AM 5 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: I swear some of you guys are so locked into the internet that you forget that being "technically right" is not the same thing as being right. I think you're the one fixated on being "technically right" brainstorming a perfect hypothetical pilot reaction in a scenario that lasted a grand total of 26 seconds. I don't know how you do ground ops but I don't spend the entire time craning my neck to check my 5 and 7 o'clock on the off chance a suicidal spanish drug addict decides today is the day he's going to swan dive into one of my engines. Yes, if you see a crazy spanish man running towards one of your engines, probably shut it down. Would it have made a difference in 26 seconds? Absolutely not. The main fan would have still been spinning plenty fast to kill him and the cowling only sits 22 inches off the ground - plenty low enough to jump into without aided engine suction.
Lord Ratner Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM 1 hour ago, FourFans said: What aircraft do you fly? Are we playing the you're probably not even a real pilot game? I'm the only non-anonymous pilot on this forum, you can do a search 😂🤣 1 hour ago, FourFans said: Literally no one here is saying they should have continued. We're saying that this happened so fast and most likely outside the view of the pilots that by the time they saw anything they could not have reacted fast enough. Most likely is that the pilots were completely dependent on comms from the ground/ops/or plugged in ground crew while this was happening You are making wild inferences. Stop being a spaz. Inferences? A quick review: 12 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: A friendly reminder to any airline pilots here, if you look out the window and see someone approaching the plane when they shouldn't be, just shut the engines down. The passengers will survive the 30 seconds of darkness as you wait for the Apu to come online, and aside from saving a life, you may be saving a whole lot of people a whole lot of trauma from seeing something most people can't handle seeing. Now, point to the part where I said this was the fault of the pilots in the video? It's nowhere. The follow-up: 11 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: Engines don't exactly stop on a dime with shutdown. Neat. This is like saying you might as well not hit the brakes if you're going 120 knots with 1000 feet left to the end of the runway on a long landing, because you won't stop in time. Sure, it's sorta true. But it's also stupid. Another inference: 6 hours ago, FourFans said: He's making the point that if the pilots had toggled the engines as soon as that guy approached the plane it would have made no difference given the time-span of this event. Aside from being incorrect (it was 15 seconds into the video when he jumped in. That's a loooooonnnggg time for engines to spool down), its irrelevant. Is it better to keep them running, or is it better to shut them down? It's not always a lunatic with a death wish. Sometimes it's a ramper holding a couple chocks, or an over eager bag-thrower who didn't realize the engines are still running because the cooldown hasn't elapsed. You gunna wait to see if he keeps walking towards the engine because "Engines don't exactly stop on a dime with shutdown?" 6 hours ago, FourFans said: Stop trying blame pilots for things they can't control. Again, please point to the part where I blamed (or made any reference at all to) the pilots in the video? 3 minutes ago, Pooter said: I think you're the one fixated on being "technically right" brainstorming a perfect hypothetical pilot reaction in a scenario that lasted a grand total of 26 seconds. I don't know how you do ground ops but I don't spend the entire time craning my neck to check my 5 and 7 o'clock on the off chance a suicidal spanish drug addict decides today is the day he's going to swan dive into one of my engines. Perfect hypothetical pilot reaction? If "turn the engines off if someone is approaching them" is perfect in your book, then I guess I must be Chuck Yeager. 6 minutes ago, Pooter said: Yes, if you see a crazy spanish man running towards one of your engines, probably shut it down. Look at that, you agree with me. So what is with all the commentary? I never made a promise that shutting down the engines will guarantee survival. I did however point out that you are an idiot if you think it matters. If anyone here can spell out a scenario where it's safer to leave the engines running "if you look out the window and see someone approaching the plane when they shouldn't be," I'm all ears. Or is this just because I said mean things to disgruntled? He's a big boy, he can take it.
FourFans Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM (edited) ...or just continue being a spaz...your call Edited yesterday at 01:31 PM by FourFans 1
disgruntledemployee Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 15 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: The follow-up: On 7/14/2025 at 11:55 AM, disgruntledemployee said: Engines don't exactly stop on a dime with shutdown. Neat. This is like saying you might as well not hit the brakes if you're going 120 knots with 1000 feet left to the end of the runway on a long landing, because you won't stop in time. Sure, it's sorta true. But it's also stupid. No, it's like saying engines keep spinning around and a round. It's not a Vitamix. They don't immediately stop when the gas is shut off. Even a stiff breeze can get the fan spinning quite fast, maybe enough to cause deadly injuries. Maybe you know this, maybe you don't. Bud, the forum has spoken. No need to go full tard on this. Brakes? Really?
Hacker Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Over the last 25 years I've been on this forum, I thought I'd already read the most inane and pointless chaff possible. (checks Baseops and reads this thread) Ope, I guess not. This is the low-water mark. Carry on. 4
uhhello Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Need one of you airliner guys to do some scientific work here. Need times from cutoff to non lethal fan speed. Only way this is getting solved. 1 1
Biff_T Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 6 hours ago, M2 said: No me gusta. This also sucks: https://www.google.com/amp/s/abc7.com/amp/post/worker-dies-getting-trapped-machine-tinas-burritos-factory-vernon/17114124/ Edited 16 hours ago by Biff_T Afterthought
brabus Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 27 minutes ago, uhhello said: Only way this is getting solved. Or a super drink off, bunch of amateurs around here! (Spoiler, the first round will be too close to call) 1
Smokin Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 27 minutes ago, uhhello said: Need one of you airliner guys to do some scientific work here. Need times from cutoff to non lethal fan speed. Only way this is getting solved. This might be the first time I've agreed with @disgruntledemployee, but I've seen a 10 knot wind make the engine windmill enough during the walk-around that looked to me like it could cut off an arm. Also, it's not a fighter in an ACM CAP. Your eyes are 95% inside on the ground if you're not moving. Absolutely 0% chance that I'd notice someone running towards the engines and think "I bet they're going to commit suicide, I'd better shut the engines down just in case."
Lord Ratner Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 3 hours ago, uhhello said: Need one of you airliner guys to do some scientific work here. Need times from cutoff to non lethal fan speed. Only way this is getting solved. You get a plane, I'll bring the watermelons!
Biff_T Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: You get a plane, I'll bring the watermelons! This may help: https://www.gsaauctions.gov/auctions/preview/321142
uhhello Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Hear me out here. Lets just give the tower or ground crews universal fuel shutoff switches to aircraft engines. Every guy on the line and in the tower has kill switch app on their phone. Problem solved. 2
Boomer6 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 hours ago, Smokin said: Also, it's not a fighter in an ACM CAP. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now