All Activity

Honest question: does that apply to FOBs? Huts? CLUs? Leased lands of Camps, Forward Airfields (leased by SOFA payments)?

The AviationistThe Crash Of B-52H 'Czar 52': The Fairchild Air Force Bas...The 1994 B-52 crash serves as a stark reminder of the importance of strict adherence to safety protocols and vigilant leadership in aviation. On June 24,

Having personally seen pilots being unfairly hung out to dry by over-zealous leadership, I would sure like to know more details about this event.

Well Pete doesn't necessarily follow other laws...

Agree LR. So many here don’t know (too young) to understand about “Going Downtown”. Lost a few friends flying Thuds on Route Pack 6. Finally, LineBacker 2 brought NV to talking after they had exhausted their SAMs. Unfortunately, many Buff crews suffered. But ended it at a cost. And Desert Storm we lost 75 aircraft. As for the MIA crew member. Hopefully, the best outcome, like the rescue of Roger Locker after 23 days evading. Good friend, Dale Stovall, flew the furthest mission into NV to rescue him. Chased down by 2 MiGs that fired Atolls at him. Time will tell. Check 6, SHFP

18 U.S.C. § 930 is the Federal statute that governs (prohibits) the possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities. A Federal facility is defined as: "...a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties."

It's also literally *the* difficult part of making a nuke. The rest is largely simple (for a country with advanced manufacturing capabilities like Iran) and extremely easy to hide. The massive array of centrifuges is the tricky bit. It's amazing to hear people argue that "Iran shouldn't have nukes, but we can at least let them get close." There's not a single use for Uranium enriched to 50% aside from weaponry. It can be perfectly logical for Iran to want nukes for deterrence. It's more likely they would use it to wipe out Israel, but who cares? Just because it's logical doesn't mean we should allow it.

They probably didn’t know they were being shot at unless they would’ve seen muzzle flash or impact from a round.

Really surprised they didn't eat some mini-gun in return.

I'm not sure using "We've got enough nuclear material for 11 bombs" was a good negotiating point from the Iranian side of the table. Didn't seem to get the result I think they thought it would.

I remember that as bipartisan second guessing which got us to the Patriot Act. But maybe my memory is bad

LinkedIn#csar #airoperations #csar | Tim De Zitter𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀: 𝗨𝗛-𝟲𝟬 𝗣𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗛𝗮𝘄𝗸 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗦𝗔𝗥 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 According to reporting by Newsmax journalist Carla Babb, a U.S. HH-60G Pav

Don't kid yourself, plenty of fighter guys have been with BQZip's mom...

I stand corrected

Makes sense. Saw a video of the hawks refueling off a herc.

Range?

You should let the DOW know of this tactic. These guys should really have some escorts with them.....

Iran said come closer and we are getting rocked. Lost 3 aircraft in 5 hours.

Why are they not using Apache escorts.

“But what about the nukes? If Iran wanted to they've shown they have the capability to launch a dirty bomb and make Israel uninhabitable. They haven't. If Iran wanted to they could develop a nuke (1940s tech), they haven't” AMAZING, defending the Iranian regime and giving them the benefit of doubt…But if Iran nuked somebody, it would be exactly like all the libs after 9/11, All they did was second guess why we didn’t do anything before about Al Qiada.

A-10 crashed as well, pilot rescued.

Herk driver. We're a bit too round and blunt to be the tip of the spear but I've gone into plenty of sketchy spots fighter guys won't ever go. In my personal opinion i's fine to joke after the fact but while the crew, now just the wso is mia I'm not going to joke about it. Iran has saber rattled occasionally every few months but never actually threatened global stability. Not even regional. They around with Israel through non state actors. Not our problem. But we poked our noses in and now it's become a regional issue and a global economic issue with no strategic goals.

Haven't seen proof of that on fox's articles. Not to mention we still have someone MIA so those "reasons" should still apply. Y'all love to blame TDS. Believe it or not many of us disapprove of these actions for multiple reasons not just because Trump's admin pulled the trigger. We take sides based on policy and beliefs not based on what our leadership tell us to parrot. Had this been a democratic pres, Israel alone, etc. I still would be disapproving for all the reasons I've stated. I'm tired of being in the middle East. I'm tired of spending my tax dollars on excessive amounts of ordinance rather than projects at home. I'm tired of seeing generation after generation sent off to do dumb shit. And we don't have a lame "let's go Brandon" chant among other derangements if you want to get started down the TDS path. But what about the nukes? If Iran wanted to they've shown they have the capability to launch a dirty bomb and make Israel uninhabitable. They haven't. If Iran wanted to they could develop a nuke (1940s tech), they haven't. They've continually come to the negotiating table and used the "what if" as a card. Then abide by the treaties to keep their program in check. Treaties that Trump removed us from for no reason.