Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. uhhello

    Gun Talk

    I've seen some super safties on those and its fucking nutzo
  3. ClearedHot

    Gun Talk

    I like my Sig. Just need a sling.
  4. Today
  5. Jesus, how many AFSC’s you have?
  6. brabus

    Gun Talk

  7. it was a holdover from when the requirement was significantly higher. It also allowed units to waive hours to less than the previous requirement, which was deemed insufficient given the UPT cuts combined with FTU course reductions pushed to the squadrons.
  8. Baro alt variations amongst the fleet in that airspace is very interesting. This accident was going to happen no matter who was piloting at some point if it was allowed to continue.
  9. Well Leard is wondering why T-6s have specific go around procedures or why SPs get graded on it, because he didn’t do it that way in the C-17. He wants “military pilots,” not “T-6 pilots.” He has never done ab initio/undergraduate training so he’s out of his element Donnie.
  10. Bro, the hog dudes have some of the gucciest shit these days. They're running scorpion whilst the rest of us are using JHMCS or no HMCS (raptors) at all.
  11. To be fair… doesn’t that meet or exceed the technology in the Hawg? Maybe these new trimmers are awesome, I dunno, everything is xeriscaped out here in the land of entrapment. 🍻
  12. Now we know who’s been going to wnba games
  13. Yesterday
  14. Maybe for this reason/policy, now rescinded 5.3.3. REMOVED. 5.3.3. SQ/CC may waive 30 percent of the total and PAA flying hours required for upgrade to aircraft commander... This change of policy must've been for some [welcome] reason!? And I'm not saying that max efforts are a problem in that community, but it is a risk and training opportunity missed b/c of no FP max effort quals when it seems training and qualifications are priorities, but its also "additional" training (qual and beans) with inherent risk requiring flt hours. Its all about in-seat experience on both counts.
  15. When I was a 2A753 (Sheet metal/corrosion control), I painted the grass in front of our Corrosion Control hangar green. This was in 1998 at the 388th.
  16. Something like this: Half a wing (like the non pilot Brits) and a giant rocket.
  17. So there is a correlation between operating multi-million dollar high tech war machines and a weed trimmer or lawn mower? My John Deere mower and Stihl trimmer are both over 25 years old. How sophisticated is lawn maintenance these days?
  18. 11-2MC-130J Vol 3 6.5.5.2: MC and FPs will not perform takeoffs or landings from the right seat under the following conditions: 6.5.5.2: During maximum effort or substandard airfield operations. FPs (MCs really since the MC-130 doesn’t really do traditional FP) finish the sim phase and don’t sit left seat again until AC upgrade or AC prep (current AC upgrade min hours is 600) therefore there’s little to no benefit to qual them in max efforts. I have not seen this be an issue during my time in the community, to include 2 schoolhouse tours and now current FTU CI. Edit to add: It's not that I haven't seen AC upgrade studs struggle with MEs; I have. It's just that by the end of the AC upgrade syllabus the average student gets it. Additionally, all the information in the MC-J HUD takes some of the art out of ME landings (power pull aside). I've seen far more ACUGs struggle with getting on/staying on the tanker, acting as the formation commander, and running a crew.
  19. They copied the uniform from Star Wars, the group name from Guardians of the Galaxy, anyone want to make a prognostication on the new badge? I'm going with the widget looking thing from Star Trek.
  20. I can’t remember what the S in AFSOC is for
  21. MC-J vol 2, 5.4 Qualification, para. 5.4.1 "First Pilots (FP) should accomplish a maximum effort take-off and landing in order to maintain this qualification." Must suck to not "should" and learn for ~2 years or more...
  22. Problem is when people in support (not that all space/cyber is support) start believing that they are actually warfighters, they forget that their job is to support the warfighter. When you lose track of how you relate to the mission, you lose track of what your real priorities should be. I don't care if you're turning wrenches, approving GPC purchases, or deploying space sharks with laser beams, you will be better at your mission when you understand how it fits into the overall mission of killing people and breaking things.
  23. The use of the term "immersion tour" made me throw up in my mouth a little.
  24. AF AMN/NCO page must be tracking this thread revival because this is perfectly on cue
  25. Why do that when you can just crucify the inexperienced crews when they inevitably put more jets in the ground
  26. In a sane and rational world with a bit of strategic vision versus how do I do this as cheap as possible not even considering risk, that program / location would / could be an answer. If they don’t wanna own new aircraft then buy the time, rent the planes and sim time. It is affordable, it’s not that difficult and they need the time, training and experience. Rant Generator - Off
  27. In the video they keep saying that Navy can do whatever they want but that Navy shouldn’t. This is legally incorrect. Underpinning any ADSO, ADSC, MSO, etc, is contract law. Navy in actuality cannot do whatever they want. Unfortunately, when 1 party (Navy) breaches the terms of the contract, alters the contract without the other party’s (the pilot) assent, they act in a lawless manner and will need to be sued to bring them back in line.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...