All Activity

The Senate confirmed a federal judge yesterday. On the contrary, the Speaker of the House swears in new members of congress. They are two separate processes, but you are trying to pull the wool over our eyes that they are one in the same. That said, the House could pass a resolution to swear her in during recess. But that resolution must occur before she can be sworn in. If you want to assert Johnson is stonewalling a resolution, then go ahead…but provide evidence that he’s actually doing that other than “your gut.”

ATF "interpretations" of late have proven to be less than stellar! In January 2024, the ATF published it recovered more than 31,000 machine gun conversion devices over the past five years (Source). But again, the issue is the GCA/NFA and why are such devices illegal in the first place? Before anyone starts the "it doesn't matter why, they just are" argument, I am fully aware of that. But much like SBRs, full reset triggers (which while functionally different pretty much provide the same result), bump stocks and everything else that's prohibited (to include fully automatic weapons), it's simply unconstitutional ("Shall not be infringed" is pretty straightforward). I will always be against any legislation that turns law-abiding citizens into criminals simply for exercising their inalienable rights! And anyone who doesn't realize this is just a stepping stone toward greater restrictions is simply delusional. Truthfully, I treat any gun legislation coming out of California as anti-2A, no matter how they sell it ("It's for the children!")

Depends on model and dealer, but 25-50%. It’s a no brainer to buy through blue label. Related note, a lot of shade is thrown at Glock for being “sub par” because owners upgrade a lot of the parts. But, even when I have chosen to do such a thing, my end result is still cheaper than the other guy’s factory gun, and matches, or out performs, its capability. That said, I think the gen 5 barrels are pretty solid and really just the trigger is what needs to be replaced. Meh money spent, especially when you get the gun via blue label.

Got a link? If true, then we agree, that's a bunch of ridiculous bullshit. But then you won't have to search very hard to find my criticisms of the Republican party.

Not surprisingly, that's a USN Sea Hawk (SH-60/MH-60). Typical Navy infatuation with the phallus! That aside, for eight bucks, you can own the UH-60 Dick Hawk patch that glows in the dark! 🫡 https://www.twotofly.net/products/dickhawk-pvc-patch

Curious, how much savings ballpark?

The point is the way the ATF interprets the NFA, intent is irrelevant. Nationwide total devices seized was something like 5800 in 2023. Anecdotally from law enforcement relatives, the uptick is very real. The low amount of federal cases is certainly interesting. My assumption is it becomes a matter of jurisdiction and federal capacity. Agree. However, Glock's interest is selling guns. I can't get upset if they prioritize doing that over being a cause crusader. Lots of government contracts. Think positive, a better trigger in all Glocks might actually be a win, I doubt they'll be able to jack the price up more than they already have. Patrick Bateman might have just forced Glock to upgrade their product line for the consumer's benefit.

That bitch needs to shut her pie hole. When Hillary and Bill left the White House, they took approximately $28,000 worth of items they claimed where personal gifts. After media scrutiny, the Clintons agreed to return any donated items determined to be intended for the White House itself. That ended up being all $28,000 worth!

Can't say I agree. The mere presence of a cruciform trigger bar does not make a Glock a "machine gun." It requires an illegal modification and part that Glock does not provide. Just because their design makes their handguns more susceptible to conversion doesn't demonstrate that was their intent. I get there's been an increase in their use; but from 2017 to 2021 Federal cases involving automatic conversion devices only rose from 10 to 83. 730% sounds a lot cooler, but it's hardly an epidemic and such drastic actions (which California is well known for!) aren't necessary as they don't target the true culprit. Of course, if the courts actually held those who use these devices liable for their actions, that would be a more effective deterrent; but once again it's a matter of punishing the good for the bad! I have zero skin in this game, I just hate it when government goes after law-abiding citizens for the actions of others. That is how we ended up with the GCA and NFA, and if the Liberals have their way, we can expect even more unconstitutional rights being denied! And we're completely fucked if Gavin Newsom ever ends up in the White House!

Congress yesterday voted to instate a conservative judge in Alabama.

One of the most iconic voices ever.

They don't read or listen. This is just where they take out their frustrations on the amorphous "Republican voter" as depicted by their favorite news outlet. Every time one of them breaks out the "why aren't you criticizing Trump like you do the liberals" routine, someone points out that nearly every conservative here regularly criticizes Trump, and then suddenly their keyboard goes quiet. It's boring.

Are you suggesting that some of us didn’t voice these same concerns (increased deficit) on here this past summer?

In case I'm wrong...

So, you all let your reps know to vote no on the Big Beautiful Bill, one that increased the deficit?

The Glock performance trigger doesn't have a cruciform trigger bar. So something developed from that will likely be the solution. AB1127 basically puts into statute the ATF's interpretation of "designed to shoot" from the NFA definition of machine gun. The ATF interprets "designed" to mean possessing design features which facilitate full automatic fire by simple modification or elimination of existing components. Which is why the ATF has forced redesigns on other firearms in the past. So basically I think Glock has gotten away with not re-designing the fire control system because of the numbers in circulation already. If the bureaucrats pointed this out, the sheer size of it all would create a very large problem. Easier to ignore. That is until a bunch of States sue Glock after switches recovered by law enforcement goes up by almost 800% over the last 6 years. Whether or not you agree with the law, or that it does anything; from within the perspective of someone who does, it makes sense to go after Glock. More importantly, it makes sense to change gears if you're Glock since they probably know they're screwed. Like you said, the other striker designs don't have the same vulnerability since you can't access the trigger bar from the slide plate.

You are so young, if you want fighters stick with fighters. You got 5 years of applying in my opinion till I'd start looking at non fighters. That is of course if you really want fighters. Scores and letters seem good enough to get you in the door at most places. Good luck with the grind.

Hi all, First post so bear with me on formatting/courtesies. I wanted to get some insight about my stats and look for any input or feedback aside from the personal criticisms I’ve synthesized from checking every corner of these forums. Here is my info: Age: 21 Scores: PCSM: 87, AFOQT: 99/98/99/81/68/82 (both 1st attempt tests), 56.9 flight hours w/ PPL Education: Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering Student @ highly-regarded institution, 3.57 GPA, graduating May 2026. On an accelerated masters track to get my MS in Aerospace Engineering as well (Late 2027/Early 2028ish) Work Experience: Co-op (effectively an intern) @ industry leader in a few engineering depts Aeroacoustics research doing V&V on a perturbation equation solver LLM (large language model, AI) research for strategic wargaming and physics-based model simulation. (Cumulative ~ 2 years of work experience in aerospace) Some other non-aerospace related jobs (entrepreneur, content moderation, cumulative ~1 yr of work experience) Extracurricular: Club lacrosse in college (No NCAA @ school) Social Fraternity (leadership roles as Vice President, New Member Educator, Risk Manager; also volunteering w/ philanthropic orgs) Did two years in Naval ROTC, various billet positions Rec Letters: Retired Col., Fighters, Test Pilot from AF TPS Retired Brig. Gen., AD Cargos & Mobilization Academic Faculty Member, VP in Aerospace Consultant Group Flight Instructor from PPL training Retired Lt. Col, Current Airline Pilot Other Pertinent Info: Parents both at the airlines, most connections through them Actively visiting units across the country My plan is strictly fighters as of now, likely to apply to cargos as well. Specifically would appreciate advice around rec letters (i.e. – should I be looking for a non-military letter for my third?), overall competitiveness, retaking TBAS for higher PCSM (can’t retake it for boards closing this year), and anything else you feel pertinent. Sorry for the word vomit, I appreciate any and all input, thanks!

OK, I went a little AI-crazy on this one, but here ya go... Yes, non-U.S. citizens can join the U.S. Air Force, but only under specific conditions. Here's a breakdown of the eligibility requirements: Lawful Permanent Residents (Green Card holders) are eligible to enlist in the Air Force and other branches of the U.S. military. You must have a valid I-551 (Green Card) with at least two years remaining before expiration. You must reside in the United States. You must have no pending deportation proceedings. You must meet the same age, education, physical fitness, and moral character standards as U.S. citizens. Dual citizens must renounce their foreign citizenship and surrender foreign passports to enlist. You must be a U.S. citizen to become an officer in the Air Force. Some military occupational specialties and security clearance positions are restricted to U.S. citizens. As of the latest update, the maximum age to commission as an officer in the U.S. Air Force is 42 years old for both active-duty and Space Force applicants. However, to become a pilot in the U.S. Air Force, you must begin pilot training before your 33rd birthday. To become a pilot in the U.S. Air Force, you must also be a U.S. citizen. This is non-negotiable due to the need for security clearances. Serving in a foreign military does not automatically disqualify you, but it may raise concerns related to: Security clearance eligibility Foreign allegiance or obligations Potential conflicts of interest During peacetime you must serve at least one year honorably in the U.S. military before applying for naturalization under Section 328 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Military applicants benefit from fast-tracked naturalization, often completing the process in 4 to 6 months. Some service members have received citizenship within weeks or months of enlisting, depending on their paperwork and USCIS processing speed. So there is a "chance," but exactly what odds you have are for you to determine...and even for US citizens, becoming a fighter pilot is a roughly 3 out of every 1,000 applicants (0.3%) chance. It depends on... U.S. citizenship Bachelor’s degree AFOQT and TBAS scores Medical clearance (IFC1) Begin pilot training before age 33 Excellent physical fitness and vision Good luck!

Bleh. I carried a Glock while deployed to Bosnia, and was a fan until I retired in 2006 and discovered the then-new and superior Springfield XD line. Honestly, Glock's kowtowing to new California legislation makes me like them even less. I get California is the third-largest gun market in the U.S.; but Glock is the only manufacturer so far to publicly announce a redesign, launching its “V Series” pistols to comply with AB 1127. I also get SIG Sauer and Smith & Wesson are not directly affected by the law as most of their pistols do not have the same vulnerability. But the California Rifle & Pistol Association says AB 1127 is a “backdoor ban” on striker-fired pistols and warns that it could impact a wide range of models sold in California, not just Glocks; yet instead of fighting it, Glock capitulated early to beat the rush (and here I thought they were Austrian, not French!). Bleh.

I didn't jump onto the Glock train until about 3 years ago. G19 Gen 5 I got at the exchange, and I really shoot it as well as any pistol I've ever owned. When I saw all the SOCOM guys carrying it I thought there must be something there. I admit I was old school and convincing myself to get a pistol without a manual safety took a while.

For those that don't know, the Glock Blue Label program is a really good deal for active and retired military.

A Glock was the first pistol I bought, but that one is still my only Glock (a pretty old model, maybe it'll start being worth something). They did push a significant innovation with their original introduction, which is good for the gun world. Hopefully this new model similarly pushes all the companies to improve.

I have two but, not a giant Glock fan. I guess they just went up in value. Crazy times.

If i am not mistaken I should be able to get citizenship quite fast if I join Air Force as green card holder