Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, brabus said:

0307B421-DE6E-4FCC-81A2-393B557E72DC.jpeg.bce3016be92be1b79a4a416191df691d.jpeg

Laces out Dan!!!!

Posted
On 7/20/2023 at 8:13 AM, CaptainMorgan said:


General Chang is a real account, and has stars on his shoulders. He is a personnelist. Bashi Chuni is Chang’s troll account where he pretends to be a pilot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bashi identifies as non-binary you bigot

  • Haha 2
Posted

9 year bonus pushed my ADSC to 6 months past 20 year retirement date. Anyone have any luck with ADSC waivers these days? No good excuses, just looking to finish right at 20. TIA

Posted
9 year bonus pushed my ADSC to 6 months past 20 year retirement date. Anyone have any luck with ADSC waivers these days? No good excuses, just looking to finish right at 20. TIA

Did you make O-5?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 hours ago, Bingo said:

9 year bonus pushed my ADSC to 6 months past 20 year retirement date. Anyone have any luck with ADSC waivers these days? No good excuses, just looking to finish right at 20. TIA

You will be denied by a civilian at AFPC within 3 days of asking unless you have unusual circumstances dictating a closer examination.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Bingo said:

9 year bonus pushed my ADSC to 6 months past 20 year retirement date. Anyone have any luck with ADSC waivers these days? No good excuses, just looking to finish right at 20. TIA

DoD Skillbridge is your friend. 

  • Like 6
Posted

My feeling is that nowadays no waivers are entertained at any level bc they gotta pump those numbers up. However, it doesn’t hurt to ask with a good story!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
16 hours ago, StoleIt said:

AFRC Bonus:

 

potato1.jpg

potato.jpg

 

Two questions. 

1.  What is SELRES ART?  Is that different from the bonuses technicians already get from the technician system?  We didn't have any pilot technicians left my last few years, so I can't remember how that all worked. 

 

2. TR Bonus.  Are your TR's getting bonuses for just staying in as part-timers, or do they have to go on orders to get that?  If it's just to be part time, well played AFRC.  There were rumors about in the in the ANG for years, but it never came to fruition during my time.   We did have one thing that came out, but the requirements they slapped on it made it so one 1 or 2 of our DSG pilots were eligible.  Basically, if you were prior-E, you were screwed. 

 

 

7 hours ago, brabus said:

Guard has a $30k/1 yr option, which is awesome. 

 

The only problem being, you have to go on orders to get it! :banghead:.  There aren't enough of your unicorn deals to go around lol.  

Posted
1 hour ago, SocialD said:

The only problem being, you have to go on orders to get it! :banghead:.  There aren't enough of your unicorn deals to go around lol. 

Completely valid!

Posted
2 hours ago, SocialD said:

Are your TR's getting bonuses for just staying in as part-timers

Yes. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

Speaking of bonuses...anyone got the details on FY23 (or FY24) ANG DSG pilot bonus? Curious if they still have the "good first year" $10k deal going on.

I've only been able to find the AGR AvB bonus...nothing for part timers.

Edited by StoleIt
Posted
Bwahahahaa! They ran out of money, mudda-fugging-ing idiots. This checks with Cannon getting a bunch of reservists to come out and then realizing they didn’t have the funding.

That’s happened to the Army every year it’s offered.

They budget for about 1/3 the available population in the hopes of forcing guys to commit early and not wait until they are in a combat zone to file for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

New bonus, including the Assignment of Preference option. Looks like scaling monetary options based on contract length OR Assignment of preference (with several caveats) OR both options that incurs a longer ADSC.

AvB.thumb.JPG.ee73d43df155371faa6dec1265736002.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
New bonus, including the Assignment of Preference option. Looks like scaling monetary options based on contract length OR Assignment of preference (with several caveats) OR both options that incurs a longer ADSC.
AvB.thumb.JPG.ee73d43df155371faa6dec1265736002.JPG
And they think this will work? Rhetorical question. It won't change anything, just give more money to people that were planning to stay anyways. Some real "smart" people came up with this dumb idea.

Sent from my SM-F926U1 using Baseops Network mobile app

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Fly4five said:

And they think this will work? Rhetorical question. It won't change anything, just give more money to people that were planning to stay anyways. Some real "smart" people came up with this dumb idea.

Sent from my SM-F926U1 using Baseops Network mobile app
 

And only took 11 months to release it!

Posted
2 hours ago, Fly4five said:

And they think this will work? Rhetorical question. It won't change anything, just give more money to people that were planning to stay anyways. Some real "smart" people came up with this dumb idea.

Sent from my SM-F926U1 using Baseops Network mobile app
 

What would you suggest?

Posted
25 minutes ago, Danger41 said:

What would you suggest?

Don't play their game, seperate to airline instead, or if you do-do it better...free agency, or maybe Guard or Reserve?? Active Duty Rated force is crumbling and buyers market is upon the rated pilot with free agency. 

For Big Blue: work with people without contracts, second order affects will follow accordingly. Oh, and make your acquisitions and test process better (i.e. equipped, manned, and informed) in order to be more responsive to rated forces/MWS inputs, needs, wants, and dreams. People want to do cool, shit hot missions..with today's tech

  • Upvote 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Swizzle said:

Don't play their game, seperate to airline instead, or if you do-do it better...free agency, or maybe Guard or Reserve?? Active Duty Rated force is crumbling and buyers market is upon the rated pilot with free agency. 

For Big Blue: work with people without contracts, second order affects will follow accordingly. Oh, and make your acquisitions and test process better (i.e. equipped, manned, and informed) in order to be more responsive to rated forces/MWS inputs, needs, wants, and dreams. People want to do cool, shit hot missions..with today's tech

All good ideas that I'd like to see implemented.

I'll pull on the acquisition and test process thing a bit to get your take. I was the DO of a rapid acq and test squadron and I saw some interesting stuff. I will say that the AF's (and by extension DoD writ large) is WAY too slow on this topic, but the steps taken and processes in place for acq/test are actually pretty good to prevent wasting of resources. I heard on the Merge about how NGAD was going to use a new testing process but has since gone back to the old method. That's disappointing but I don't know enough to intelligently comment on that. 

The part that concerns me about your statement is the lack of response to your force (I'm assuming C-130 based on your avatar?). One constant battle I had (I also was the Command Chief Pilot while the DO so it was my job to make sure we knew what the community wanted and looked for) was a lack of knowledge about how to get things changed. There was the standard aircrew bitching but hardly ever any follow through on actual written requirements and documents. That's where the big disconnect would take place because we would move out immediately on stuff once we got it...we just had to get it. Writing 1067's, JUONs, CMNS, TIPs, anything like that will at least get the ball rolling to allocate resources. Do those requirements just not go anywhere or what's going on?  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...