Israel strikes Tehran

[brickhistory]

19 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:

Lol. No. 

 

Maybe North Korea thinks about it. Maybe. Nobody else with nukes is giving them to Iran

Israel might.

But not in a good way...

[waveshaper]

31 minutes ago, brickhistory said:

Israel might.

But not in a good way...

 

A version of Nuclear Sharing is a possibility. We do it, Russia/Belarus do it, the old Soviet Union did it and take a look at the Pakistan/Saudi Arabia arrangements.

Nuclear sharing - Wikipedia

[JimNtexas]

5 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Sadly it looks like it is going to spiral...Iranian Parliament approved the closure of the Straight of Hormuz. Additionally, the Iranian Nuke sites were not completely destroyed and they possibly moved the nuclear material. Finally, there are indicators the Iranians are planning an attack on U.S. bases in the region.

In 1988 Iran tried to close the Straight with mines.  One USN vessel was damaged.  The next day President Reagan ordered an attack on Iran the sank exactly half of Irans Navy.  When we have a President with cajones we don’t have put up with shit from tin pot dictators.

 

I have to admit that all the expert tariff economist online are now saying that they have irrefutable bomb damage assessment from multiple 30,000 pound weapons that designated 100s of feet underground. Come on pull the other one.

Edited 21 hours ago by JimNtexas

[Clark Griswold]

I’m not saying regime change but I’m just saying empowered disaffected minority groups who are sick of of oppressive corrupt theocrats like pallets of AK-47s, claymores, IED kits, drones and RPGs dropped from the sky

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/6/20/a-simple-visual-guide-to-iran-and-its-people

When you have your enemy on the ropes, don’t stop


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[busdriver]

7 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

 Additionally, the Iranian Nuke sites were not completely destroyed and they possibly moved the nuclear material.

CH, what do you have on this?

 

Edit To Add:

For anyone else who was busy doing other shit today:

-Satellite imagery shows a shitload of trucks outside Fordow Thursday/Friday timeframe.

-IAEA says no indication of increased radioactivity post strike at the various sites.

-US officially can't confirm the whereabouts of the nuclear stockpile of 60% material.

 

Take all that for whatever it's worth...

Edited 19 hours ago by busdriver

[uhhello]

1 hour ago, busdriver said:

CH, what do you have on this?

 

Edit To Add:

For anyone else who was busy doing other shit today:

-Satellite imagery shows a shitload of trucks outside Fordow Thursday/Friday timeframe.

-IAEA says no indication of increased radioactivity post strike at the various sites.

-US officially can't confirm the whereabouts of the nuclear stockpile of 60% material.

 

Take all that for whatever it's worth...

If you zoom in, you can see they are dump trucks.  Not likely to be transporting uranium around but not impossible.  Other theory is they were adding earth to the access points to impede the strikes that they knew were coming eventually.  If they were transporting material out, you can imagine those were the most tracked vehicles in recent history by most anyone with the means to do it. 

[uhhello]

Edited 18 hours ago by uhhello

[raimius]

When both Star Wars and Top Gun 2 called it.  😂

[brabus]

Props to the targeteers as well - that’s a difficult problem to solve, and they crushed it (pun intended). And to the TWAC dude at WIC (blanking on name right now) - I hope you’ve survived the 30hr erection this brought on!

Edited 7 hours ago by brabus

[Smokin]

Helps to have 180,000 pounds to throw at a problem.

[fire4effect]

40 minutes ago, raimius said:

When both Star Wars and Top Gun 2 called it.  😂

I have a mental picture of Maverick turning to Rooster asking what was "The second video ever played on MTV" 

right before weapons release. I heard Trivial Pursuit is popular way to pass the time on long missions.🫡 

[disgruntledemployee]

On 6/21/2025 at 9:44 PM, Anon1 said:

I think what the post intended was to show that Trump/acolytes/Fox News Talking Heads beat the anti war drum very hard and very loud.  He railed against the deep state war hawks and vowed The Purge.  MAGA ate it up.  Some on here did too.  The irony was just pointed out.  The response, but but but Joe, and Hillary, and that one dude.

UKR.  I have always advocated to support them against our mortal enemy, Putin. And many I know did too, up until Trump didn't.  Then all I heard from them were Fox talking points on waste of $$, blah, blah, blah.  Maybe Trump has learned.

Back to reality.  I'm guessing most here would acknowledge that a nuclear Iran is very bad and the US might have had to do something about it.  Call it a realist view of the world, weather you're True MAGA, wear the hat to piss off your lib aunt, classic R, Libertarian, Dem, Progressive Dem, or full Libtard.  Israel did the world a favor, but they didn't have everything they need to finish the job.  Trump was likely asked by them to bust the deep shafts wide open with his Midnight penetrator by making a hole and then exploding deep inside.  And without lube. 🤣 

Back to reality.  Now comes the tough part.  Are we done?  Is a coalition put together to take Iran out of the bad guy world and on a path  the likes of WWII Germany and Japan?  Is that even possible?  And who?  And how?  Or do we leave it to Israel? 

[Sua Sponte]

Al Udeid is being attacked.

https://x.com/GrahamAllen_1/status/1937192149801398624

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Sua Sponte

[SocialD]

1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said:

Al Udeid is being attacked.

https://x.com/GrahamAllen_1/status/1937192149801398624

 

 

 

I'd wager that it was "Attacked."  Good face saving move.  

[disgruntledemployee]

Start carpet bombing the place to the stone age.  Neuter anything that launches into the sky.  Sink their entire Navy.  Seize every oil tanker.  Lop the head off anyone that spouts off any harm to the US, preferable before they get the last word out of their mouth.  And take all their assets to pay for it all.

[Lawman]

 
 
I'd wager that it was "Attacked."  Good face saving move.  

NYT reporter already with news of it being exactly that.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ClearedHot]

The depravity of Democrats and professors at our "elite" institutions.  A tenured George Town Professor (who has now deleted his social media presence), HOPES Iran does some symbolic strike on a base.

How about GFYS.

[Lord Ratner]

1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:

The depravity of Democrats and professors at our "elite" institutions.  A tenured George Town Professor (who has now deleted his social media presence), HOPES Iran does some symbolic strike on a base.

How about GFYS.

Look the guy is obviously a Islamist hack, but it doesn't sound like he wants dead Americans. 

He literally said "symbolic strike," as in we all know the political and diplomatic realities necessitate some sort of response, so I hope it's symbolic as opposed to meaningful, which would force the US to escalate. 

 

Overblown.

[disgruntledemployee]

WTF.  That's all I got.  Not just for a dumb ass advocating for a strike on the US, but for allowing Iran to tell us and we kinda go, sure.  If I took that call, I would have said, "Try it and I will unleash hell.  You ain't seen shit yet."  Maybe they would have tried it anyway, but the way I see it, allowing such an action gives the current faction some face saving when they don't deserve it.

Peace!