brickhistory Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: Lol. No. Maybe North Korea thinks about it. Maybe. Nobody else with nukes is giving them to Iran Israel might. But not in a good way... 3 2
waveshaper Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 31 minutes ago, brickhistory said: Israel might. But not in a good way... A version of Nuclear Sharing is a possibility. We do it, Russia/Belarus do it, the old Soviet Union did it and take a look at the Pakistan/Saudi Arabia arrangements. Nuclear sharing - Wikipedia
JimNtexas Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Sadly it looks like it is going to spiral...Iranian Parliament approved the closure of the Straight of Hormuz. Additionally, the Iranian Nuke sites were not completely destroyed and they possibly moved the nuclear material. Finally, there are indicators the Iranians are planning an attack on U.S. bases in the region. In 1988 Iran tried to close the Straight with mines. One USN vessel was damaged. The next day President Reagan ordered an attack on Iran the sank exactly half of Irans Navy. When we have a President with cajones we don’t have put up with shit from tin pot dictators. I have to admit that all the expert tariff economist online are now saying that they have irrefutable bomb damage assessment from multiple 30,000 pound weapons that designated 100s of feet underground. Come on pull the other one. Edited 9 hours ago by JimNtexas 1 1 1
Clark Griswold Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I’m not saying regime change but I’m just saying empowered disaffected minority groups who are sick of of oppressive corrupt theocrats like pallets of AK-47s, claymores, IED kits, drones and RPGs dropped from the sky https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/6/20/a-simple-visual-guide-to-iran-and-its-peopleWhen you have your enemy on the ropes, don’t stopSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
busdriver Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 7 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Additionally, the Iranian Nuke sites were not completely destroyed and they possibly moved the nuclear material. CH, what do you have on this? Edit To Add: For anyone else who was busy doing other shit today: -Satellite imagery shows a shitload of trucks outside Fordow Thursday/Friday timeframe. -IAEA says no indication of increased radioactivity post strike at the various sites. -US officially can't confirm the whereabouts of the nuclear stockpile of 60% material. Take all that for whatever it's worth... Edited 7 hours ago by busdriver
uhhello Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, busdriver said: CH, what do you have on this? Edit To Add: For anyone else who was busy doing other shit today: -Satellite imagery shows a shitload of trucks outside Fordow Thursday/Friday timeframe. -IAEA says no indication of increased radioactivity post strike at the various sites. -US officially can't confirm the whereabouts of the nuclear stockpile of 60% material. Take all that for whatever it's worth... If you zoom in, you can see they are dump trucks. Not likely to be transporting uranium around but not impossible. Other theory is they were adding earth to the access points to impede the strikes that they knew were coming eventually. If they were transporting material out, you can imagine those were the most tracked vehicles in recent history by most anyone with the means to do it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now