E-7A Wedgetail

[uhhello]

11 minutes ago, brabus said:

Problem is none of these manned platforms are survivable if WW3 kicks off. UAS constellation and space are the only viable long term solution (speaking specifically to maintaining capes we need whilst in a shooting match with the PRC).

I'm not so sure anything in space is safe if shit really kicks off

[Lawman]

I'm not so sure anything in space is safe if shit really kicks off

Yeah but we can build and launch at a rate they can’t thanks to things like Elon.

So while it would suck, that’s an attrition fight they can’t match us in. People in skill positions are a lot harder to make.

All bets are off if they or anybody else go the “if we can’t have it nobody can” route and just set a few nukes off in low Earth orbit.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[brabus]

2 hours ago, uhhello said:

I'm not so sure anything in space is safe if shit really kicks off

 Not saying it is, but space/UAS/other tech are substantially more effective and survivable/easily replaceable than manned C2ISR in a war with the PRC. I’m not even talking about losing people, I’m purely talking about persistent C2ISR capability that manned assets simply cannot provide. 

[uhhello]

16 minutes ago, brabus said:

 Not saying it is, but space/UAS/other tech are substantially more effective and survivable/easily replaceable than manned C2ISR in a war with the PRC. I’m not even talking about losing people, I’m purely talking about persistent C2ISR capability that manned assets simply cannot provide. 

It'll take about 10 destroyed satellites to make space un-usable.

[brabus]

Between manned C2ISR and other tech, manned loses every time (in the context of full war with PRC). “Lose” defined as either literally lost, or mission ineffective. Much easier to succeed with other tech (not to say it’s indestructible, can’t be degraded/denied, etc.) than manned. It’s simply the world/near future we live in, at least in PACOM.

Edited 7 hours ago by brabus