The Next President is...

[Lord Ratner]

I'm not sure what the correct thread is for this, but Trump made it possible, so I'll put it here. SCOTUS just overturned Chevron. If it wasn't for Roe this would be the biggest news from the SCOTUS in a decade at least, and it's still the most consequential by a landslide. 

This is a massive win for small government, assuming there are no gotchas in the ruling. I haven't gotten to read it yet. 

[tac airlifter]

2 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

What's a stay behind device? Just a bug?

There's an entire industry behind that answer, and I'm speculating (but I'm right, lol).

The technology of what is possible for such items can fit through legal loopholes.  "Just a bug" doesn't do it credit, but every weird idea and tech we used during GWOT has been improved and incorporated into FBI arsenal.
 

 Does it make sense they were searching his wife's underwear drawer, or does it make more sense they tore his place apart looking for documents (whose location was known) as pretense for leaving monitoring devices?  
 

Consider what the FBI has already done to Trump: spied on his campaign (and lied about it), colluded with the Clinton campaign to promote the fake Russian dossier, entrapped and ruined his close advisors (Flynn among others), etc.  And that was before he fired Comey and they stepped it up. Yes, my statement is unsupported speculation but logical and fits the pattern.  

[McJay Pilot]

2 hours ago, GrndPndr said:

So let the speculation begin (or continue)!

Since it seems more likely than ever (though not guaranteed) a new Demo candidate will be thrust forth (sts) - who will it be?  Some choices:

• That person who is the current VP (Harris)
• Michele Obama
• That person who ran against trump in 2016
• Gavin Newsome
• Kennedy
• Your Mom

 

 

She was there for all of us before, she’ll be there for all of us in the future. BQZip’s Mom 2024!

[Lord Ratner]

9 minutes ago, tac airlifter said:

There's an entire industry behind that answer, and I'm speculating (but I'm right, lol).

The technology of what is possible for such items can fit through legal loopholes.  "Just a bug" doesn't do it credit, but every weird idea and tech we used during GWOT has been improved and incorporated into FBI arsenal.
 

 Does it make sense they were searching his wife's underwear drawer, or does it make more sense they tore his place apart looking for documents (whose location was known) as pretense for leaving monitoring devices?  
 

Consider what the FBI has already done to Trump: spied on his campaign (and lied about it), colluded with the Clinton campaign to promote the fake Russian dossier, entrapped and ruined his close advisors (Flynn among others), etc.  And that was before he fired Comey and they stepped it up. Yes, my statement is unsupported speculation but logical and fits the pattern.  

I do not consider anything surprising for the FBI at this point, but is there even the suggestion of evidence this happened? The most damning evidence against Trump in the Florida documents case is a secret recording of Trump admitting he knew they were classified and that he failed to declassify them... Recorded by Trump himself. 

 

Has anything suggested the use of secret devices in this case?

[ClearedHot]

6 hours ago, Negatory said:

You literally did exactly what I said you would do.

A non sequitur that focuses only on one failure and entirely avoids addressing the absolutely appalling and sad performance from Trump as well, because you are so polarized and don’t want Biden to win. Check your morals brother. Don’t be blinded by politics.

Did someone steal your lunch money...again? 

So let me get this straight, if I don't respond using your template I have questionable morals?  You need some serious mental help.

[TreeA10]

1 hour ago, tac airlifter said:

There's an entire industry behind that answer, and I'm speculating (but I'm right, lol).

The technology of what is possible for such items can fit through legal loopholes.  "Just a bug" doesn't do it credit, but every weird idea and tech we used during GWOT has been improved and incorporated into FBI arsenal.
 

 Does it make sense they were searching his wife's underwear drawer, or does it make more sense they tore his place apart looking for documents (whose location was known) as pretense for leaving monitoring devices?  
 

Consider what the FBI has already done to Trump: spied on his campaign (and lied about it), colluded with the Clinton campaign to promote the fake Russian dossier, entrapped and ruined his close advisors (Flynn among others), etc.  And that was before he fired Comey and they stepped it up. Yes, my statement is unsupported speculation but logical and fits the pattern.  

Look up journalist Sheryl Attkisson and the sketchy stuff that was uploaded on her computers by a suspected 3 letter agency because of her reporting during the Obama administration.

[BashiChuni]

[tac airlifter]

1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said:

I do not consider anything surprising for the FBI at this point, but is there even the suggestion of evidence this happened?
 

Has anything suggested the use of secret devices in this case?

No, as I said, pure speculation from me.  But I’m right, lol!

[HeloDude]

7 hours ago, Negatory said:

Sorry you don’t believe in the justice system. Read the case. 12 jurors decided unanimously he committed a crime. You just want to say it’s BS because it fits your narrative, but I am 100% certain you haven’t looked into it further. The evidence is clearly there.

Just stick your fingers further in your ears.

If this means I’m supposed to believe that every verdict for a defendant has been good and correct, that every court ruling on whether or not a law is Constitutional has also always been good and correct, and lastly that every potential person that committed an alleged crime wasn’t let off the hook/not prosecuted (cough cough Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton), then I guess you and I have very different opinions of our justice system.

Or you can just laugh now that Trump was convicted, but then you’ll also probably cry when he is elected President.  His reelection is far from certain (I still wouldn’t be surprised if he lost given that the Dems do some weird and shady stuff when it comes to elections), but I think the odds are definitely favoring Trump than Biden—we shall see…if even Biden is still the nominee past August.

[ViperMan]

Biden can still be the nominee. The only thing the democrats lost last night was the ability to hide behind the illusion that "everything is fine" with Biden. That's all they lost. Biden hasn't been running the administration. Biden isn't running the administration. And if he wins, Biden won't be running the next administration. Everyone already knew the actual truth before this. And honestly, that lie wasn't all that important to begin with - democrats do what they want in order to obtain power; if one thing has become clear over the last cycle, it's that.

The democrat establishment still has the power they they need, and hence will move on from last night's ooopsies with grace (as they do) and will press on with Biden as their guy.

Edited June 28, 2024 by ViperMan

[herkbier]

6 hours ago, GrndPndr said:

So let the speculation begin (or continue)!

Since it seems more likely than ever (though not guaranteed) a new Demo candidate will be thrust forth (sts) - who will it be?  Some choices:

• That person who is the current VP (Harris)
• Michele Obama
• That person who ran against trump in 2016
• Gavin Newsome
• Kennedy
• Your Mom

 

 

Michele Obama.. and she wins by a landslide. 

[Smokin]

I'm not sure what is scarier, the fact that her primary (only?) qualification is the person she sleeps with or the fact that you might be right.

[Lord Ratner]

4 hours ago, ViperMan said:

Everyone already knew the actual truth before this.

The American people did not.

[HossHarris]

9 hours ago, McJay Pilot said:

She was there for all of us before, she’ll be there for all of us in the future. BQZip’s Mom 2024!

A candidate we can ALL get behind !

[brabus]

36 minutes ago, HossHarris said:

A candidate we can ALL get behind…AGAIN!

FIFY

Edited June 29, 2024 by brabus

[Biff_T]

12 hours ago, HossHarris said:

A candidate we can ALL get behind !

 

11 hours ago, brabus said:

we can ALL get behind…AGAIN

I'm here for the gang bang. 

 

Break, Break

Edited June 29, 2024 by Biff_T
Photo op

[SHFP]

So why did President Biden go to a Waffle House (or ANY place) after the Debate with the “Cold” that the White House said he was suffering with, shake hands, and hug….And let alone without a Mask!?  WTF

[Biff_T]

11 hours ago, SHFP said:

So why did President Biden go to a Waffle House (or ANY place) after the Debate with the “Cold” that the White House said he was suffering with, shake hands, and hug….And let alone without a Mask!?  WTF

He had the munchies. 

[HeloDude]

So it seems that many on the left (House minority leader, etc) today are saying support Biden being the nominee?  I’m guessing they have to say this up until the exact point that Biden says he’s no longer running?

[kaputt]

They will have to pry the title of First Lady from Jill’s cold, dead hands. Unless Jill is giving Joe the green light, he’s still going to be in the running. 

[dream big]

1 hour ago, HeloDude said:

So it seems that many on the left (House minority leader, etc) today are saying support Biden being the nominee?  I’m guessing they have to say this up until the exact point that Biden says he’s no longer running?

The devil they know, and they know Biden since he’s been in politics longer than Biff has been alive. Kamala was supposed to be the new face and “future of the party,” and now Dems are realizing she’s as popular as cancer. They are uncomfortable with any potential for surprises with a new candidate. Plus, Biden did beat Trump in 2020. Finally, the Dems don’t take kindly to those who step out of the party line. Kyrsten Sinema and Tulsi come to mind. 

[Biff_T]

7 hours ago, dream big said:

The devil they know, and they know Biden since he’s been in politics longer than Biff has been

This

[bfargin]

Our country is currently being run by DNC leftist elites. So really it won't matter at all to them if they have Dementia Joe Stalin or some other braindead numbnuts (e.g. Kamala, Gavin, etc) in office as POTUS. As long as the puppet installed falls in line, all is good for the leftist and haters of our country.

I can bitch and moan with the best of us, but I'm usually a pretty optimistic guy. This election concerns me regardless of who is elected. Four more years of DNC rule and we'll be totally finished as a nation. But, if Trump wins we know there's going to be madness. The lefts propensity to destroy, riot, and kill when they lose will be on full display.  Unless lawmakers enable law enforcement to actually keep and enforce order, it could get ugly.

[arg]

I'm dibsing this chick before Biff does.

 

[BashiChuni]

A tragic comedy. 🎭