The Next President is...

[ClearedHot]

11 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

You're rationalizing why it's OK.  That's part of the problem.

And you've ignored the same egregious behavior on the other side...that IS the problem.

[Lord Ratner]

19 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

You're rationalizing why it's OK.  That's part of the problem.

I'm not rationalizing it dude, I'm explaining it. I'm also not sensationalizing it like you are. January 6th sucked, but it was not an insurrection. End of story.

 

I'm not voting for any of them because I will never vote for someone over 65 again, however, the entire root of the problem and why Donald Trump is going to win again is specifically because his opposition insists on treating him as a unique threat when in fact he is the exact same product with an uglier label slapped on.

 

The regular people out there see right through this now, they don't know what the crimes are, the sins, the comparisons, or any of the other details. They just know that Washington has been lying to them for a long time and funneling a tremendous amount of wealth and prosperity from the middle class directly to their family and associates. They wanted a hero, but they are settling for a villain who at least validates their experience.

 

Go look up the stats for how many Democrats thought the election was stolen when a Republican president won, and specifically Trump. The numbers are functionally identical to 2020, just reversed. It is unfounded sanctimony.

[Biff_T]

[disgruntledemployee]

On 5/21/2024 at 4:20 PM, ClearedHot said:

And you've ignored the same egregious behavior on the other side...that IS the problem.

No, I have not, and anyone that's read my shit knows it.  I have stated many times that Biden, etc are just as bad. 

So, for the record, and for all to review for all time, here is where I stand.

Trump - Dishonorable, Corrupt, Bad - Fuck him

Biden - Incompetent/Senile, Corrupt, Bad - Fuck him

Vote for anyone else.

There, have I made my self more clear?

[HeloDude]

You can hate Trump, but if you believe is true justice, this should bother you.  Not only did they have this trial in a place where its citizens are overwhelmingly against Trump politically, but the judge is clearly biased against the defendant, and the charges are being twisted to say, “well, it would be a misdemeanor with expired statutory of limitations but now how he did it somehow makes it a felony”…and for the final act, the judge now tells the jury that they don’t have to all agree on what the same crime is/was committed for there to be a conviction.

Not even to mention that the media keeps calling this a “hush money to a porn star case”, which is not illegal.  
 

 

[uhhello]

1 hour ago, HeloDude said:

You can hate Trump, but if you believe is true justice, this should bother you.  Not only did they have this trial in a place where its citizens are overwhelmingly against Trump politically, but the judge is clearly biased against the defendant, and the charges are being twisted to say, “well, it would be a misdemeanor with expired statutory of limitations but now how he did it somehow makes it a felony”…and for the final act, the judge now tells the jury that they don’t have to all agree on what the same crime is/was committed for there to be a conviction.

Not even to mention that the media keeps calling this a “hush money to a porn star case”, which is not illegal.  
 

 

Yeah, from my limited knowlege on the courts, those instructions can't seem legit.

[BFM this]

The point is not a conviction, or jail time, or anything really meaningful; those are all just talking points to froth up the base.

From the outset this was clearly a straw case for a kangaroo court, eminently appealable. 
 

…but it is on the eve of the election.  And THAT is the whole point.

[TreeA10]

1 hour ago, BFM this said:

The point is not a conviction, or jail time, or anything really meaningful; those are all just talking points to froth up the base.

From the outset this was clearly a straw case for a kangaroo court, eminently appealable. 
 

…but it is on the eve of the election.  And THAT is the whole point.

That's my opinion.  Just get a conviction for anything regardless of whatever rule or procedure has to be bent BEFORE the election knowing that an appeals court will likely throw it out. 

 

1 hour ago, BFM this said:

The point is not a conviction, or jail time, or anything really meaningful; those are all just talking points to froth up the base.

From the outset this was clearly a straw case for a kangaroo court, eminently appealable. 
 

…but it is on the eve of the election.  And THAT is the whole point.

Just watched "Empire of Terror" on Daily Wire.  It's a series by Bill Whittle documenting the rise of communism in Russia.  Complete disregard of a fair judicial system was a hallmark of that process..... So we have that going for us.

[tac airlifter]

Is there a law or norm the democrats won't break to stop their political opponents?

This sham trial is outrageous.

[di1630]

Just watched "Empire of Terror" on Daily Wire.  It's a series by Bill Whittle documenting the rise of communism in Russia.  Complete disregard of a fair judicial system was a hallmark of that process..... So we have that going for us.

The parallels between the communist party and the democrat party is amazing. Maybe not direct views but the corrupt power dynamic, control of supporters, schemes to retain power etc.

I just read 2x books about communist defectors and how they described discovering the fallacies of communism was pretty much the leftist playbook.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

[Biff_T]

They're mad because WOKE is failing.  

Panic mode is all they can maintain. 

[disgruntledemployee]

On 5/29/2024 at 1:49 PM, uhhello said:

Yeah, from my limited knowlege on the courts, those instructions can't seem legit.

I believe the judge was stating what the law says regarding the steps to a decision for each count.  But I fly airplanes, not lawyering. 

BTW, 34/34 guilty.  But hey, he can always appeal.

[Biff_T]

Say what you will about nature.   

What we have been witnessing in American Politics is complete lunacy.  They (shady politicians) are simlpy screaming to stay afloat in a bowl of t"U"rd soup ((learned how to spell terd with a U a year ago and didn't hook a single flight in UPT lol) .  UPT was easier then children,  we actually flew planes instead of playing video games)).  Those who can't admit they don't know everything, will never make it in a world where cameras are everywhere. Old tricks don't work with the youngins' Biden, trust me, because I work selflessly with them.  Im like a batman for justice, who doesn't care about fame.   No social media...at all.  At allllll (other than here, but nobody cares about us) I'm truly free.  But some call that crazy.  But you know what?  I've been doing this for more than 18 years and all of the children I touched (strong STS) are starting to turn voting age.  

Think about that.  

Yet I'm a simpleman.  

Edited May 31, 2024 by Biff_T
Spelling bee failure

[Biff_T]

True change takes a long time.

 

Let Boston play 

"Don't look back".  

[Biff_T]

Here is the video, for the retards:

 

 

[BFM this]

It would appear that Tulsi just endorsed DJT, in case anyone had that on their 2024 bingo card.

 

[HeloDude]

9 hours ago, BFM this said:

It would appear that Tulsi just endorsed DJT, in case anyone had that on their 2024 bingo card.

 

This isn’t surprising at all based all on what she’s been saying the last year.  Though I like a lot of what she’s been saying, until she says “I was wrong on…gun control, government spending, taxes, increased government regulation, etc because of X, Y, Z” (don’t forget, she was a Democrat with a voting record and positions on issues), then I still would never vote for her compared to someone else with a stronger record on those issues I just mentioned.  Just my $.02.

[Danger41]

On 5/30/2024 at 5:04 PM, Biff_T said:

Here is the video, for the retards:

 

 

As a duly authorized representative of the retards, we thank you.

Also, on the topic of communism.

 

[ClearedHot]

The tripe above to distract you form the continued and consistent lawfare being waged by the left.  Let's review:

1.  The Biden DOJ #3 left to join the NY Attorney General's office (unheard of), and ended up giving the opening argument against trump.  The rest of the trail I won't even get into...even MSNBC admits it will be overturned, but the DNC got the "convicted felon" sound bite they wanted for the election.

2.  Today in the Hunter Biden trial the FBI presented the laptop as VERIFIED evidence meaning it WAS Hunter's laptop.  Still waiting for a single one of the former Intelligence Officials to apologize and admit they were wrong....or for the big tech firms that suppressed the story to admit they were wrong....or the media...I know, it will never happen, just a wave of the hand.

3.  The Attorney General testified today and defended all of his actions including trying to hold back the actual tapes of the Biden interview even though the transcripts are out.  The official DOJ reason...the tapes could be used to make deep fakes.  WTF?  50+ years of making political speeches, there is enough out there to make deep fakes...they are not even needed they way this demented idiot speaks these days.

4.  Today Biden took executive action on the border...after claiming for years there was nothing he could do and he didn't have the power...oh and after reversing Trump's border order on day one in office.  Anyone want to address testimony from Mayorkas saying our border is secure...nothing to see here.  I would invite you all to read this idiotic executive order...it is a complete farce.

Republicans are NOT perfect...but for F's sake Democrats are insane.

[Swizzle]

35 minutes ago, ClearedHot said:

The tripe above to distract you form the continued and consistent lawfare being waged by the left.  Let's review:

// //

2.  Today in the Hunter Biden trial the FBI presented the laptop as VERIFIED evidence meaning it WAS Hunter's laptop.  Still waiting for a single one of the former Intelligence Officials to apologize and admit they were wrong....or for the big tech firms that suppressed the story to admit they were wrong....or the media...I know, it will never happen, just a wave of the hand.

//  //

Republicans are NOT perfect...but for F's sake Democrats are insane.

FY25 NDAA markup includes....

https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-move-strip-security-clearances-from-hunter-biden-letter-signees-2023-6

.. to effectively strip security clearances from any intelligence or defense official who signed on to an October 2020 statement that raised the question of whether the release of Hunter Biden's emails was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

As part of a much-larger bill funding US defense, Republicans on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense proposed prohibiting any funding to grant, renew, or maintain a security clearance for any official who signed the statement.

More than 50 former intelligence officials, including former CIA Directors Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta, and John Brennan, signed the letter raising questions about the then newly published New York Post story concerning emails from Biden's laptop. 

Edited June 4, 2024 by Swizzle
Also from today: FBI special agent Erika Jensen, the first witness in Hunter Biden's trial on felony gun charges in Delaware, introduced key evidence Tuesday including text messages and photos taken from Biden's infamous laptop and other devices.

[ClearedHot]

54 minutes ago, Swizzle said:

FY25 NDAA markup includes....

https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-move-strip-security-clearances-from-hunter-biden-letter-signees-2023-6

.. to effectively strip security clearances from any intelligence or defense official who signed on to an October 2020 statement that raised the question of whether the release of Hunter Biden's emails was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

As part of a much-larger bill funding US defense, Republicans on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense proposed prohibiting any funding to grant, renew, or maintain a security clearance for any official who signed the statement.

More than 50 former intelligence officials, including former CIA Directors Mike Hayden, Leon Panetta, and John Brennan, signed the letter raising questions about the then newly published New York Post story concerning emails from Biden's laptop. 

The marks will die in the Senate...and Biden would veto it...have to defend the clown show.

[BFM this]

Next they’ll suggest stripping clearances for sending SCI over private email.  

Crazy talk!  Just madness!

[HeloDude]

6 hours ago, joe1234 said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bombshell-report-reveals-team-trump-141058553.html

Well, it’s not like Yahoo News has been wrong in the past when showing their anti-Trump bias.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-intel-dem-trump-collusion-russia-well-established-090037417.html

[kaputt]

18 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

4.  Today Biden took executive action on the border...after claiming for years there was nothing he could do and he didn't have the power...oh and after reversing Trump's border order on day one in office.  Anyone want to address testimony from Mayorkas saying our border is secure...nothing to see here.  I would invite you all to read this idiotic executive order...it is a complete farce.

 

They probably did the math and reached critical mass on whatever demographic they were hoping to import. 
 

That or the amount of illegal foreign nationals probing security at military bases or taking pictures of service member’s homes reached a point they couldn’t ignore it. 
 

Either way, what a shit show. 

[M2]

Well, Russell Brand is backing Trump (something I would have never guessed!)...

Russell Brand: If it's a choice between Trump or Biden, only one candidate will protect democracy and freedom

Actor and comedian Russell Brand said he finds it difficult to understand why any freedom-loving American would choose to vote for President Biden over former President Trump in the upcoming election.

In a new episode of his podcast "Stay Free with Russell Brand," scheduled to premiere on Friday, Brand sat down with model, author and RNC spokeswoman Elizabeth Pipko for a wide-ranging interview in which the pair discussed Trump's trial and subsequent conviction.

"In a straight choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, if you care about democracy, if you care about freedom, I don’t know how you could do anything other than vote for Donald Trump for precisely the reasons that they claim that you can’t," he told Pipko...(full article at title link)