HU&W Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Looks like there may be an opening for a Reservist Major at MacDill... In all seriousness though, this is exactly the kind of press the AF doesn't need right now. link Air Force Reserve transportation officer David Mario Riley answered an online Craigslist ad from a man who was looking for someone with a sexual interest in children. Riley wrote an email in December: "Hi, I saw your ad … while looking for other pervs in the area … I will be visiting DC from jan 27-feb 7, but will be alone … and would like to get together with other pervs and explore taboo." That contact is described in federal court records charging Riley, 37, of Tampa, former commander of the 927th Logistics Readiness Squadron at MacDill, with distributing child pornography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 https://www.efoia.af.mil/palMain.aspx Wooton Report of Investigation (S7050P)ALLEGATION, that Brig Gen Kevin B. Wooton engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a contract employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Mllitary Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Wooton engaged in an inappropriate intimate and/or sexual relationship with Ms. [REDACTED]. This behavior disgraced him personally and seriously compromised his standing as an officer, given his position, marital status, rank, and stature.http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108821/brigadier-general-kevin-b-wooton.aspx Uhrich Report of Investigation (S7077P)ALLEGATION 1, that Brig Gen David C. Uhrich, from on or about 28Jan13 to on or about 15 Feb 13, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Ms. [REDACTED], an Air Force non-appropriated fund employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich engaged in a romantic relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] while he was married, which in his unofficial capacily dishonored him personally, and hence was unbecoming as an officer and gentlemen. ALLEGATION 2, that between July 2011 and May2012, Brig Gen David C. Uhrich consumed alcohol in a manner that was of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces, in violation of Article 134, General Article, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich's actions relating to alcohol use, to include repeatedly drinking while on duty, was of a nature to, and actually did, bring discredit to himself, the Air Force general officer corps, and the armed forces.http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108667/brigadier-general-david-c-uhrich.aspx Givens Report of Investigation (S7030P)ALLEGATION 1 that Brig Gen Robert Givens, from on about Sep 2010 to on or about Aug 2012, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. [REDACTED], the wife of a fellow Air Force officer, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentlamsa, was SUBSTANTIATED.http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108719/brigadier-general-robert-p-givens.aspx Long's Report of Investigation (S7079P)ALLEGATION 2. That beginning on or about April 2011, Colonel Scott C. Long engaged in an unprofessional relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] in violation of AFI 36-2909, Professional and Unprofessional Relationships, was SUBSTANTIATED.http://www.388fw.acc.af.mil/library/biographies/bio.asp?id=14408 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoo Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 What a sweet signature block. Very informative. Every time you post you start like 27 new threads. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chappy Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Go ACC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so.it.goes Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Never heard of the skank clock rating. How does that work? I second the motion for an explanation... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Thirded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeA10 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 This was sent as an explanation: I heard about this from the rescue guys in Bagram, but they called it something else I can't remember. One of the guys literally put together a powerpoint to explain it. If I remember right it was similar to the stress vs. performance model, but with skank vs attractiveness instead. Drawn out it looked like the top half of a clock, with examples being sister theresa sitting at 9 o'clock being zero attractiveness/zero skank, courtney love sitting at 3 o'clock being zero attractiveness/max skank. The sweet spot for max attractiveness per unit skank was in the 11 to 1 position. I believe Megan Fox held the 12 o'clock position on their particular powerpoint example. Everything below the 3-9 line was like negative attractiveness. I'll have to see if I kept a copy of the powerpoint. Very in depth, WIC level presentation. Pretty funny shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 (edited) That sounds Epic. I'm going to work on one at home. Edited February 7, 2014 by guineapigfury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 When used with the B_p vs B_r (beauty perceived vs beauty real) and corner ugly [think E-M diagram] wrt drinking driving down inhibition, could drive some serious TTPs. WIC level analysis on that as well from one of the older guys in our sq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeA10 Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 I think this is closely related to tequila goggle theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Perfect for the SARC thread 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 Bob is my new favorite troll. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitteEinBit Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 ALLEGATION, that Brig Gen Kevin B. Wooton The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Wooton engaged in an inappropriate intimate and/or sexual relationship with Ms. [REDACTED]. ALLEGATION 1, that Brig Gen David C. Uhrich, from on or about 28Jan13 to on or about 15 Feb 13, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Ms. [REDACTED], Brig Gen Uhrich engaged in a romantic relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] ALLEGATION 1 that Brig Gen Robert Givens, from on about Sep 2010 to on or about Aug 2012, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. [REDACTED],. ALLEGATION 2. That beginning on or about April 2011, Colonel Scott C. Long engaged in an unprofessional relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] Wow, that Ms Redacted is a whore! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Spike Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 ALLEGATION, that Brig Gen Kevin B. Wooton The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Wooton engaged in an inappropriate intimate and/or sexual relationship with Ms. [REDACTED]. ALLEGATION 1, that Brig Gen David C. Uhrich, from on or about 28Jan13 to on or about 15 Feb 13, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Ms. [REDACTED], Brig Gen Uhrich engaged in a romantic relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] ALLEGATION 1 that Brig Gen Robert Givens, from on about Sep 2010 to on or about Aug 2012, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. [REDACTED],. ALLEGATION 2. That beginning on or about April 2011, Colonel Scott C. Long engaged in an unprofessional relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] Wow, that Ms Redacted is a whore! That must be BQZip's mom's maiden name. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 (edited) And the hits just keep on coming (sts): http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/04/she-says-she-was-raped-working-undercover-as-an-air-force-informant.html Spies, Lies, and Rape in the Air Force: An Undercover Agent's Story: Jane Neubauer was just out of basic training when a secretive military unit recruited her for an undercover mission. She claims she was raped on duty. The Air Force isn’t so sure. A pretty one-sided story with not much hard evidence, however, it is still more bad press. Edited March 5, 2014 by Fuzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcj Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 (sigh) another one - this time the Army's lead sexual assault prosecutor. http://www.stripes.com/army-s-top-sex-assault-prosecutor-suspended-after-assault-allegation-1.271461 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaco Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 (edited) From the article: "Sources told Stars and Stripes that the female Army lawyer alleged that Morse attempted to kiss and grope her against her will. The alleged assault reportedly took place in a hotel room..." Rookie mistake. Everyone knows when invited to come into a female JAG's hotel room (or she comes over to yours) you always make sure you whip out the 69-page "Consent to enter into a relationship of a sexual nature" contract before you put the moves on. Oh, and never dip your pen in the company ink. Ever. ETA: more innuendo Edited March 6, 2014 by Flaco Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 ...or just record the whole thing. Worst (or best?) case is that it keeps you out of jail...if that's never needed, then you get to watch the best porno ever made (well, if you're me anyway). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17D_guy Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 ...or just record the whole thing. Worst (or best?) case is that it keeps you out of jail...if that's never needed, then you get to watch the best porno ever made (well, if you're me anyway). Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. Making a sex tape is a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the military’s highest court has ruled. http://www.armytimes.com/article/20130529/NEWS/305290002/Making-sex-tape-crime-troops-court-rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted March 6, 2014 Share Posted March 6, 2014 Thank God you are not a real operator...time is too precious to have to explain jokes and sarcasm. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hispeed7721 Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 Making a sex tape is a crime under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the military’s highest court has ruled. bad news...guess what you need to reset AGAIN... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravedigger Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 Thank God you are not a real operator... LOL, Air Force pilots are calling themselves operators now? You must be in AFSOC... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeHoler Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 LOL, Air Force pilots are calling themselves operators now? You must be in AFSOC... I do work in the Operators Group. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcj Posted March 7, 2014 Share Posted March 7, 2014 I do work in the Operators Group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 10, 2014 Share Posted March 10, 2014 U.S. v. Chief Master Sergeant R BOWSER Type of Court-Martial: General Court-Martial Location: RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom Projected Trial Start Date: 02-Jun-2014 Estimated Trial End Date: 07-Jun-2014 Offense(s) Charged: Article 120, Rape Article 120, Rape using force Article 125, Sodomy Article 128, Assault consummated by a battery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now