Jaded Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/22/us-japan-f16-crash-idUSBRE86L02L20120722 No word yet on the pilot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmacwc Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Efffff.....Any words Ram? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rancormac Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 2012 has sucked thus far regarding crashes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 He's good...shittiest flight of my life and hopefully that never changes (knock on wood). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmacwc Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 He's good...shittiest flight of my life and hopefully that never changes (knock on wood). ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 The pilot is OK and safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
contraildash Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 That's a long way out in the north Pacific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techsan Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Article said they were headed to North America? Part of a coronet? Great news the pilot is alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flare Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Glad he's ok, and can't wait to hear the story. I always wondered how those rescues would go during a Coronet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Article said they were headed to North America? Part of a coronet? Great news the pilot is alright. If so it wouldn't be the first time. Happened a few years back, F-16s out of Japan spatial d night tanker coronet silk letdown. Either you've been there or you will be there some day. Glad he/she is ok. Hope the boom got the tail number first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger41 Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 If so it wouldn't be the first time. Happened a few years back, F-16s out of Japan spatial d night tanker coronet silk letdown. Either you've been there or you will be there some day. Had that happen to me and it was freakin' scary as shit. However, I wasn't over the ocean and didn't involve a new tie from Martin Baker, thank God. Glad to hear that he's okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techsan Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 If so it wouldn't be the first time. Happened a few years back, F-16s out of Japan spatial d night tanker coronet silk letdown. Either you've been there or you will be there some day. Glad he/she is ok. Hope the boom got the tail number first. I have been a part of VERY few coronets that were planned for night. If there were delays & the chicks would be landing at night I thought it required a waiver from their MAJCOM? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted July 22, 2012 Author Share Posted July 22, 2012 Landing at night requires a waiver. Flying at night does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Spike Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 I have been a part of VERY few coronets that were planned for night. If there were delays & the chicks would be landing at night I thought it required a waiver from their MAJCOM? Going west to east generally involves night flying to avoid landing at night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuggyU2 Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 What's the big concern with the night landings? Is it just an exercise thing? Or is this fairly common? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 (edited) I always wondered how those rescues would go during a Coronet. Much better than I ever thought one would go...props to the tanker bros, they did a great job. Except you get one hit...asking for our tail numbers What's the big concern with the night landings? Is it just an exercise thing? Or is this fairly common? Very common...they avoid night landings due to fatigue, complacency, etc. after a 6-9 hr "uneventful" flight. It just adds one more element that could potentially cause mishaps. I believe its a MAJCOM/CC waiver required to land at night, but not 100% sure on that. Edited July 22, 2012 by brabus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Like Buddy Spike said. This is standard going east to avoid the extra risk of landing at a strange field at night after a long sortie. Makes some sense but it is legacy from the really old days when flying at night was done once a quarter for currency only and...it was considered an EP by most fighter guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VCQ09 Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Glad to hear that the Viper driver is OK and thanks/ありがとうございますto my JSDF colleagues who pitched in for the rescue (I worked with 200+ JSDF troops last year, mostly pilots but some search and rescue squadrons as well). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Techsan Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Much better than I ever thought one would go...props to the tanker bros, they did a great job. Were they KC-10s or the mini-tanker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royal Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 (edited) Were they KC-10s or the mini-tanker? There's a tanker other than the 10? Glad the pilot's safe; cheers to the crews. Edited July 22, 2012 by Royal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimuth Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 There's a tanker other than the 10? Yeah, the one that's RVSM compliant in Europe without a waiver and has glass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeHoler Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Yeah, the one that's RVSM compliant in Europe without a waiver and has glass. The -10 is RVSM complaint worldwide. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azimuth Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 The -10 is RVSM complaint worldwide. My bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sky_king Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 You kids and your new fangled fancy flying machines. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prozac Posted July 23, 2012 Share Posted July 23, 2012 Much better than I ever thought one would go...props to the tanker bros, they did a great job. Except you get one hit...asking for our tail numbers Very common...they avoid night landings due to fatigue, complacency, etc. after a 6-9 hr "uneventful" flight. It just adds one more element that could potentially cause mishaps. I believe its a MAJCOM/CC waiver required to land at night, but not 100% sure on that. Sounds like you had a part in this. Once the dust settles I hope we get some good feedback on how the SAR went down and what the tanker did right and wrong. I've often thought about this scenario on coronets. Unfortunately, it's not something we spend a lot of time on (if any) during mission planning/briefing in the tanker community. Glad to hear it all worked out ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now