Clark Griswold Posted May 9, 2023 Posted May 9, 2023 I get what you’re saying, but this is why we’ll never have nice things. Maybe but I think we who don’t like this or similar policies need not give up either our careers or beliefs but look for new avenues of attack (legal, ethical and metaphorically speaking)That’s not an advocacy for anything UCMJ punishable but to use the tools available What’s necessary is solidarity, transparency, communication and mutual support - yeah it sounds like a union and I’m not sure that’s it but a voluntary association that will support those who step forward to say non hoc porcus. The AFA could be tasked with this mission if it could have a level of support / agreement from its members on what would constitute reasons to support current Airmen taking actions to protest / challenge AF policies that this part of the AFA would stand behind the member to prevent illegal or unfair retaliation.Media coverage / information, legal support and career support could be provided to put a net underneath those taking a riskSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
HuggyU2 Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 Looks like the 47 OG/CC referenced in the letter (Col Bingham) was brand new in the job, and is now the 6th ARW/CC at MacDill. What's the feeling on him from those that know him?
Polar Bear Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 On 5/3/2023 at 9:53 PM, BashiChuni said: oh no you don't...we KNEW pretty early on that covid was statistically a non event for young, healthy people. and turns out Fauci and his buddies at Pfizer KNEW it didn't prevent the spread...we were told straight up lies and coerced into taking a shot that provides zero protection and is very harmful...latest numbers i heard were 1 in 800 have side effects. that is a very high number and this shot should NEVER have been MANDATED. so don't give me this 20/20 bullshit....the warnings were being issued very early on but ING CENSORED Can you please provide your source on this? 1 1
Pooter Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 17 minutes ago, Polar Bear said: Can you please provide your source on this? I was going to ask the same thing but it's kinda not worth engaging. Claiming it provides "zero protection" while being "very harmful" based on a number "he heard" is the kind of quality, evidence-based reasoning that lets me know it's probably time to put the phone down for the night. Funny part is my point has never been about the jab itself. It's always been about having the awareness to know what you signed up for and go in eyes wide open. I'm a big believer in worrying about the biggest and closest alligators to the boat, which, in terms of service member health risks, are: 1) long term ailments from on-the-job hazards we've completed normalized 2) dying in some interventionist boondoggle halfway round the world ... ... ... ... 67) drowning in Tumon bay 68) actual alligators 69) covid vaccine side effects Which is why this whole outrage seems a little manufactured, out of proportion, and strangely coincident with a red-to-blue presidential admin turnover. 3
bfargin Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Polar Bear said: Can you please provide your source on this? Have you been asleep for the past 2.5 years? 1
pawnman Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 7 hours ago, Pooter said: I was going to ask the same thing but it's kinda not worth engaging. Claiming it provides "zero protection" while being "very harmful" based on a number "he heard" is the kind of quality, evidence-based reasoning that lets me know it's probably time to put the phone down for the night. Funny part is my point has never been about the jab itself. It's always been about having the awareness to know what you signed up for and go in eyes wide open. I'm a big believer in worrying about the biggest and closest alligators to the boat, which, in terms of service member health risks, are: 1) long term ailments from on-the-job hazards we've completed normalized 2) dying in some interventionist boondoggle halfway round the world ... ... ... ... 67) drowning in Tumon bay 68) actual alligators 69) covid vaccine side effects Which is why this whole outrage seems a little manufactured, out of proportion, and strangely coincident with a red-to-blue presidential admin turnover. One does wonder, if Trump had been reelected, touting "his" vaccine (developed in Operation Warp Speed under his administration), would vaccination trends be reversed? Would the liberals be screaming about Trump's "unsafe vaccine" and "payouts to big pharma" while conservatives "followed the science" and attempted to ostracized unvaccinated lefties "as a safety precaution"? 2
SocialD Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 8 hours ago, Pooter said: I'm a big believer in worrying about the biggest and closest alligators to the boat, which, in terms of service member health risks, are: 1) long term ailments from on-the-job hazards we've completed normalized 2) dying in some interventionist boondoggle halfway round the world ... ... ... ... 67) drowning in Tumon bay 68) actual alligators 69) covid vaccine side effects ... ... ... 669) Causing a drain on the healthcare system and/or Dying from Covid. Updated your list of concerns for service member health risks. 1
VMFA187 Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 Pawnman, Pooter, Polarbear, Negatory - Go read The Real Anthony Fauci. It'll be good for you. I read White Fragility and realized it was complete and utter bullshit. Maybe you'll feel the same about the former, but I bet you won't. Or you can just keep reading reports that agree with your viewpoints that have been fed to you by big pharma and keep deepening your foxhole. 1
VMFA187 Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 36 minutes ago, Negatory said: Everyone understood it wouldn’t kill young people, yes, even early on. The purpose was to maintain the healthcare system. Here are the facts: Side effects of the vaccine were NOT well understood until it was made and distributed to a significant portion of the population, and the negative heart effects are not typical of other vaccine efforts. Those are real, and they are unfortunate. If you say otherwise, provide proof. The fact that it does not significantly limit spread was NOT understood - it initially was believed to significantly cut spread, up to 90%. It didn’t, and that is unfortunate. If you argue otherwise, provide proof. As a side note, many of you strongly pushed for ivermectin just because conservative propaganda wanted you to go against the grain, which has still been shown to have almost no efficacy and multiple bad side effects. Don’t see that addressed very often on here. The vaccine has a very high efficacy rate of reducing mortality and severe illness in those over a certain age. It reduces death rates in populations over 60 by up to 90% in many excess death analyses. You’ll note that many on this forum - me included - advocated for the vaccine when these things were believed: that it would limit spread, have no significant side effects (like most other vaccines), and limit mortality in vulnerable populations. It only accomplished limiting mortality (which you entirely scoff), and that’s when liberals as a population began not pushing for vaccination as the solution anymore. Especially not for young people, as they were a transmission vector whether or not they got the shots. Your anger is unjustified. Then it shouldn't have been forced upon young people. Then it should have been studied longer - Agreed? Especially before coercing people to take it. Then it should have been studied longer - Agreed? Ivermectin has been 100% shown to be effective. There is a reason that it received bad press, there was no money in that treatment. Great, have them take it. Maybe you should have a more skeptical mind. That is your fault. Anger unjustified? I was forced to take an unproven vaccine at the behest of the big pharma industrial complex. Go **** yourself. 1
brabus Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 @Negatory Really helping your credibility here. Feel free to peruse multiple years of discussion where you were wrong, many people were right, you were a self-righteous asshole to them, then you gave a “sorry (but not really sorry)” apology after it became impossible to hide the fact you were wrong…and now you’ve decided to quadruple down by arguing why it’s OK you were wrong and being a douchebag to others was warranted. It must be painful as fuck to be your IPs/WOs dealing with all the quibbling and excuses you must make. 1
pawnman Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 1 hour ago, VMFA187 said: Pawnman, Pooter, Polarbear, Negatory - Go read The Real Anthony Fauci. It'll be good for you. I read White Fragility and realized it was complete and utter bullshit. Maybe you'll feel the same about the former, but I bet you won't. Or you can just keep reading reports that agree with your viewpoints that have been fed to you by big pharma and keep deepening your foxhole. Pass. I already think Fauci is a douche. That doesn't change the fact that the vaccines did drastically reduce the lethality of Covid among those most susceptible. I never wanted broad mandates for all Americans. I recognized that the president had the authority to make the military take the vaccine. That's very different than demanding the unvaccinated be kicked out of restaurants, schools, stores, hospitals, etc. 1 4
VMFA187 Posted May 10, 2023 Posted May 10, 2023 20 minutes ago, pawnman said: Pass. I already think Fauci is a douche. That doesn't change the fact that the vaccines did drastically reduce the lethality of Covid among those most susceptible. I never wanted broad mandates for all Americans. I recognized that the president had the authority to make the military take the vaccine. That's very different than demanding the unvaccinated be kicked out of restaurants, schools, stores, hospitals, etc. I already knew the answer. But thanks for validating me. 3 1
Pooter Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 10 hours ago, SocialD said: Updated your list of concerns for service member health risks. Probably valid, but it made you non-effing -deployable because no other country on earth would let you in 2 1
SocialD Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 2 hours ago, Pooter said: Probably valid, but it made you non-effing -deployable because no other country on earth would let you in That's strange, I hadn't gotten the shot and they still sent my ass to Afghanistan after a ridiculous quarantine in the deid in 2021. The fucking black mold in the old (coalition compound) dorm rooms were probably a greater detriment to my health than the two bouts of covid I've had. I can guarantee you that if we were really needed somewhere, we'd have gone, with or without the shot. 1
HuggyU2 Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 (edited) It may not be the entire Air Force, but I'll tell you something that's wrong with ACC: ePEX. We've had it now for what... 20 years? And it's getting worse. Holy shit, PEX is literally killing those that use it daily. Our entire Information Technology enterprise is a mess. The AF puts the "IT" in "shit". Edited May 11, 2023 by HuggyU2 7 3 4
slc Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 10 hours ago, Pooter said: Probably valid, but it made you non-effing -deployable because no other country on earth would let you in Yeah, no. Tell that to my buddy who was sent to Africa. Nice try 1
uhhello Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 10 hours ago, HuggyU2 said: It may not be the entire Air Force, but I'll tell you something that's wrong with ACC: ePEX. We've had it now for what... 20 years? And it's getting worse. Holy shit, PEX is literally killing those that use it daily. Our entire Information Technology enterprise is a mess. The AF puts the "IT" in "shit". Nailed it. The current version is hilariously bad. It's down at least a few times a day. Our base had a contractor who's job was PEX. He knew EVERYTHING and could fix ANYTHING with a phone call. They cut his contract last year due to apparently no complaints or issues with pex so no need for a local help desk 🙂 Now we have a remote help desk who I don't think know what PEX is. 1
Boomer6 Posted May 11, 2023 Posted May 11, 2023 ePEX is why there are 20+ fighter squadrons using the gonkulator (created by a viper dude) to schedule. 2
Pooter Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 On 5/11/2023 at 5:11 AM, slc said: Yeah, no. Tell that to my buddy who was sent to Africa. Nice try Cool.. east bum-phuck Africa didn't have a vax mandate. Curious, what round of anthrax shot is your buddy on? Deployments are to other places than Africa and in my community I directly witnessed people go non deployable 1 1
brabus Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 Irrelevant, red herring argument. If we want to go somewhere and needed everybody, we’d do it, period. Exhibit B: entire navy ship goes NMC for a week because their 100% vaxxed crew all got COVID…but they all were green on a slide, how could this happen! Making an argument based on green slides and appeasing country X is nonsensical. 2
slc Posted May 12, 2023 Posted May 12, 2023 2 hours ago, Pooter said: Curious, what round of anthrax shot is your buddy on? He's been in since 2000
Polar Bear Posted May 21, 2023 Posted May 21, 2023 (edited) On 5/10/2023 at 7:14 AM, VMFA187 said: Pawnman, Pooter, Polarbear, Negatory - Go read The Real Anthony Fauci. It'll be good for you. I read White Fragility and realized it was complete and utter bullshit. Maybe you'll feel the same about the former, but I bet you won't. Or you can just keep reading reports that agree with your viewpoints that have been fed to you by big pharma and keep deepening your foxhole. RFK is not a valid source. Edited May 21, 2023 by Polar Bear 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now