Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,531

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. SurelySerious
    Do you see the JPRC changing within/out of the AOC construct, or just putting it in AFSOC to OT&E? Because if it's still under the Air Component Commander of whatever theater, then the go/no-go decisions won't change much. HHQ ef ups aren't because the CRO on the ops floor was trained with ACC funding/regs, if that makes sense. Those dudes are pretty fangs out as it is.
  2. SurelySerious
    Untitled.pdf
  3. SurelySerious
    Pretty interesting article; I only had a chance to skim this morning, so glad you posted.
  4. SurelySerious

    Gun Talk

    SurelySerious replied to VL-16's topic in Squadron Bar

    Kimmel was crying on tv this time, it's serious! Can't believe that's the 2 seconds I saw mistakenly flipping channels. Agree on the need for a pragmatic approach vs reactionary moves.
  5. SurelySerious
    That would never happen!
  6. SurelySerious
    What if we let him have a black market SA-7 as a compromise, and give him free reign in a certain small town outside Vegas?
  7. SurelySerious
    Curious: Who's asking you? Honestly, haven't ever looked it up because it never occurred to me; not even a blip on my radar past, "oh, new patch. That's cool."
  8. SurelySerious
    There are more entertaining ways. Maybe that piano burn gets a little out of hand... Not as inconspicuous, admittedly.
  9. SurelySerious
    Sadly ACC has given way to AFGSC on the bomb wing side.
  10. SurelySerious
  11. SurelySerious
    I may never understand his contempt for compensating the volunteer force sts.
  12. SurelySerious
    My commentary wasn't on the process itself, but rather that the AF is portraying this as some great thing they're doing for people, when it's a self-induced reaction to the circumstances, and that people who otherwise don't want to get promoted could be voluntold.
  13. SurelySerious
    "Opportunity"
  14. SurelySerious
    Standard gatekeeper BS Like you're getting at: they probably correlate their strat with the amount of time they don't tell the boss anything unsettling, instead of addressing problems. Service before self?
  15. SurelySerious
    Which feeds further into the double secret decoder ring.
  16. SurelySerious
    I was curious whether Google Translate would be able to detect this incoherent smattering of words as English. I'll be damned, it did.
  17. SurelySerious
    Diversity and inclusion! http://www.kktv.com/content/news/Controversial-newsletter-compares-veterans-to-white-supremacists-441704493.html
  18. SurelySerious
  19. SurelySerious
  20. SurelySerious
  21. SurelySerious
    I have no argument, but I am going to continue pointing out to you (since you're "slow") the discussion was about a Kaepernick exhibit at the museum, and there was a claim that Clarence Thomas would be a better subject. As far as everyone else you keep trying to use as a distraction to the real discussion?
  22. SurelySerious
    Don't be obtuse; the article in question was about a Kaepernick exhibit, and the objection was made about him versus what they should have in an exhibit about Thomas.
  23. SurelySerious
    Pretty sensible, which means McCain et al would outright reject it.
  24. SurelySerious
    2
  25. SurelySerious
    So we took technology already on the shelf developed for a partner nation...and made it worse?
×
×
  • Create New...