Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,535

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. SurelySerious

    Gun Talk

    SurelySerious replied to VL-16's topic in Squadron Bar

    Standard "leadership" TTP of not answering the question that was asked whatsoever, nice.
  2. SurelySerious
    I got an email in response to a ticket from an A1C asking me to justify why our NIPR computers should work by providing how many people use them, how often they deploy, how many pilots/officers we have, and what our squadron's mission is Pretty sure it was probably a Russian hacker. So we've got that going for us.
  3. SurelySerious
    This Navy? http://www.defensenews.com/articles/grounded-nearly-two-thirds-of-us-navys-strike-fighters-cant-fly
  4. SurelySerious
    The experts can correct if required, but the roadshow was in town recently, and they said yes. Their main concern is being able to get ~4 good years out of you.
  5. SurelySerious
    He's got some great lines throughout the episode. You just have to look past the 18 minutes about the skynet projector hmcs...although it's probably not much worse in an ejection situation than what we've actually got in JHMCS.
  6. SurelySerious
  7. SurelySerious
    Re Scorpion and AMRAAM: Kinematically, you kind of lose out going slow and launching BVR.
  8. SurelySerious
    You wanted "better" locations, no?
  9. SurelySerious
    Sounds close enough to what the AF was looking for at EFB spin-up phase that I'd buy it.
  10. SurelySerious
    False. You can apply and not get selected multiple times. If, however, you get selected for something to which you have applied and turn it down, then you can no longer apply.
  11. SurelySerious
    Only a win if anyone reads them.
  12. SurelySerious
    While the loss of life is certainly nothing to make light of: you, sir, need to pack it up and go home. This is the military, not flag football.
  13. SurelySerious
    Holy run-on sentences, Batman.
  14. SurelySerious
  15. SurelySerious
    http://www.flyingsquadron.com/forums/topic/19418-18x-pipeline-q-a/
  16. SurelySerious
    Please. All of Obama's decisions, for 8 years, were made seemingly based on re-elect-ability and his "legacy" instead of the best interests of the United States. I don't like the thought of either one of them making decisions that way, frankly, nor am I yet comfortable with Trump's motives...but Obama and his Harvard-smart team were the kings of making decisions to make him look good. Just without the guy on the NSC facade.
  17. SurelySerious
    Conversely, having random people not actually qualified in the jet fly with you is a pain in the ass, so no one would bat an eye if you weren't calling to get on the schedule. They're your gate months, do as you wish.
  18. SurelySerious
    Ah, nice. And diminishing parts source for some part of the boom flight control that would require significant changes, if I remember correctly from talking to bros.
  19. SurelySerious
    Guess that takes care of the ADS-B issue.
  20. SurelySerious
    Seriously.
  21. SurelySerious
    Nor do I think it has a chance for success; more of a public shaming of the sponsor from Alabama, Mike Rogers.
  22. SurelySerious
    That's what I was fulfilling; just figured I'd go ugly early!
  23. SurelySerious
    This is an internet argument, so clearly you're talking about Hitler. Kidding.
  24. SurelySerious
    Oh, good. I didn't realize the UN was such a threat to our sovereignty. https://twitter.com/repmikerogersal/status/816380592833105920 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193 Apparently some people are dreaming up new nightmares for funsies.
  25. SurelySerious
    Whoa whoa whoa whoa
×
×
  • Create New...