Boomer6

I've never seen a policy letter on the UPT side that alludes to this, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I think your best bet is to contact Randolph stan/eval and see if they have data. It's possible they have a policy on this. If not, you'd probably have to ask them to gather MAS (MAAS?) data for all army guys that went through T-6s and/or Rucker. MAS is basically the overall pilot score each stud receives. If you can get AETC to send you those scores for prior army guys and ask them to tell you where it falls on the bell curve you could draw some conclusions from that. That data is definitely available from our GTIMS (UPT flt record/grades software if you're unfamiliar), but will require someone to sort through to find the prior army guys. Knowing the AF it's probably going to take a colonel making a formal request just to get the ball rolling. If you get a general to make the request maybe you can get the data prior to the end of FY25.

Man, if only we'd have bought a bunch of gripens or some re-imagined 1960s interceptors to combat china's new tech.

Pure failure of leadership at the squadron level, in my experience at least. I've seen the same absolutely idiotic decisions because sq/cc's didn't know their ppl, ignored their desires (even when it made sense), or outright used the vml to punish ppl they disliked. AFPC leadership owns plenty of blame. The bros at the porch have been bailing like crazy after that assignment. Based on what they say about AFPC leadership I don't blame them.

I loathe AFPC and the promotion structure. However, the taxpayer deserves to get their money's worth for the cost of UPT etc. If there are late to rates banking on not doing 10, sucks to suck. Shoulda went guard.

Remember you're dealing with the service where the CSAF released a memo saying you could roll your sleeves up, and dudes had to carry around the memo for months because chiefs were trying to pull the, "its not in the regs.." BS. They could write this into law tomorrow and it'd take the mental athletes at MPF 6 months to figure out how to change this in their computer system.

I rest my case on Miami being overrated. Respond whenever you want, but bringing up a terrible Georgia performance against GT to prove your point is disingenuous. The discussion was concerning those 3 teams as of the end of week 13.

I see you waited an entire week to respond. After Georgia played GT.. Interesting you didn't mention anything about Tennessee. The rankings after last week have Miami-6, then Georgia, then Tennessee, so I'm not the only one unimpressed by a one loss Miami.

They're the same person.

You guys have been getting trolled by this retard for far too long. Did you forget about gen. chang..? You're arguing with a wet doorknob. Do yourself a favor and open your profile, select the settings gear, and add him too ignored users.

Not sure it's a great way for pilots to get out early. I saw a dude wait until after dropping a viper to tell his flt/cc he was a conscientious objector, so they sent him to tankers. He's apparently fine with enabling everyone else to kill, as long as he's not the one doing it.

Who needs SAMs or sophisticated drones. All you need is a few $400 DJIs and maybe some code you can find on the internet.

As a non-member of the SEC faith, I think there are SEC teams (Georgia and Tennessee) that have a far better argument than a team like Miami. Miami, who squeaked out a 4 pt win over VT, a 1 PT win over Cal, and who lost to GT. I'd say Miami is equivalent to 8-3 SC. SC's 3 loses were to Bama, LSU, and Miss. Two of those loses were by 3 pts or less.

Why do you think it should be shuttered?

Who let the geriatric copy/paste an entire article in size 69 font? Someone get that guy a metamucil and take the keyboard from him

Both have proven terribly inefficient. I'd rather we spend money strapping some AIM-174/260/XXX to a submarine and launch those suckers via the ECS with third party targeting from radars mounted on multiple dirigibles across the Pacific..

I genuinely don't know if you guys are trolling with a joint interceptor concept.. The massive waste of money attempting to re-imagine the cold war interceptor, now this time as a joint project, is so painfully ignorant of all we've learned, or should have learned, regarding aircraft design/procurement that congress would probably approve it.

Our past forays into joint fighter design have went so well, we should definitely spend billions doing it again.

Just buy a rope and tie some knots in it..

I commend your optimism, but we can't even design a jet trainer with an ffing boarding ladder...

A jet that's big, fast, guzzles fuel, has poor turn performance, and poor cockpit visibility is every fighter pilot's dream. If we just make them big enough to be nuclear powered they won't even need to carry their own fuel!

Nothing like seeing unranked Georgia Tech win 2 years in a row