Jump to content

Boomer6

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    693

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Boomer6

  1. Boomer6
    Only drones...?
  2. Boomer6
    Idk if you understand the significance of the 🤌...
  3. Boomer6
    Ah yes, the classic case of mid-season SEC butthurt. A common symptom of an overrated team after losing a game they were a double digit favor to win. Other symptoms include jealousy, confusion, and menstrual cramps..
  4. Boomer6
    So when these companies are nationalized we just fire/kill their bobs and lawyers. Easy fix 🤌
  5. Boomer6
    Can you explain? Are we talking defense CEOs refusing to do what the government asks of them during an existential crisis, or they won't be capable of doing what's asked because they lack the manufacturing capability/personnel etc., or something else?
  6. Boomer6
    Eh, I have full confidence that these companies will be threatened into submission, or nationalized if democrats are in power.
  7. Boomer6
    Are you asking if a military member should be expected to report to work if they're not being paid?
  8. Boomer6
    Are you familiar with the American civil war? What about pre-WII when FDR was president? Have you heard of McCarthyism? What about the 60s? Post Dec 7th 1941 through the duration of the war and from 9/11 until we invaded Iraq are the only times I can think of in the modern era where there was agreement by both parties on where the country needed to go.
  9. Boomer6
    When did this happen would you say?
  10. Boomer6
    But only ones that didn't used to be dudes.
  11. Boomer6
    Based on how shitty the -46 system is I have zero desire to ever get gas from a "robo-boom"...
  12. Boomer6
    Clearly you used no critical thinking skills in evaluating my comment. Posting clearly biased links to support your case makes my point better than I could have.
  13. Boomer6
    Disagree. We've had plenty of defense secretaries with zero military experience/only bureaucratic experience, and they weren't all idiots. The military is the primary form of defense, yet they'd never been in the military and some did fine. Bondi was actually an AG in Florida, so her not being a US attorney seems irrelevant. You know, kinda like Obama was a community organizer before he was a senator. What I'm saying is, disagree with her politics all you want, just come up with a less stupid analogy.
  14. Boomer6
    I'm not arguing what a dead guy would do. George Marshall, on several occasions went out of his way to have face to face discussions with his GOs abroad on important matters. If you want to get nit-noid and say he never got them all together, I'd say you're correct, hard to do in the middle of WWII. You can't prove he'd be worse than Marshall unless we enter another war similar to the Korean War (when Marshall was SECDEF). I guess it's a good thing for the SECDEF your opinion doesn't matter, just like mine doesn't.
  15. Boomer6
    As I said, Marshall would have had an in-person meeting, just as Hegseth did. By all means though, continue to argue about points I didn't make...as is tradition.
  16. Boomer6
    Biff I've gotta ask, were you that squadron member?
  17. Boomer6
    Finally, a post under 690 words.
  18. Boomer6
    You said who your barometer was and I said who mine was. Simple as that. Until we're in WWIII we'll never know if any Sec Def would have matched up to CoS Marshall. Nice try though. Having political arguments with ppl butt hurt over who's in office so they come to the internet for "wins" isn't my idea of healthy living.
  19. Boomer6
    George Marshall would have, that's the barometer I use.
  20. Boomer6
    Regardless of the outcome of the Miami v FSU game it was poignant that their pre-game hype men were a murderer and a sexual predator 🙃
  21. Boomer6
    I don't think this is a conspiracy thing at all. Our comm has been compromised time and again, if not directly via actors in foreign countries then via ppl like Snowden. This seems like a great cover for passing high level info, while also publicly providing expectations face to face. Seems fairly logical to me. Even if it was just to give direction, then an in-person brief is definitely justified. The liberals/fat retired nonners are butt hurt, sucks to suck. If Panetta had done this to provide direction on Dont Ask Don't Tell repeal it would have been justified and ppl like Rainman woulda lost their shit whilst NSAPlayer threw a rainbow party...RIP
  22. Boomer6
    Thanks for making my point on AF comm...
  23. Boomer6
    Lol what comm SQ did you run where we could get 800 ppl on a VTC at once and it actually worked?
  24. Boomer6
    Let's not waste money on some tinker toy tanker that doesn't carry enough gas for a 4-ship and is built by a country that's rapidly cozying up to China. That last part alone is enough reason to not even consider it. How about we spend that money on protecting our tankers from a Pearl Harbor-esque attack from a semi truck full of drones.
  25. Boomer6
    You guys are not looking at the positives of the twice a year PT test. There is no reason to try for a 90/95% since you have to take it twice a year anyways. Min run that shit. The Kool aid drinkers will still try for high scores, so maybe once they're generals they at least won't be fat.
×
×
  • Create New...