Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Agreed and while what they have said is reprehensible, this approach is likely an insult as Charlie was fighting for his beliefs, the Constitution and debate...which clearly includes free speech. there is of course a line in calling for more violence but most of this is tasteless sickening opinion.
  3. I know in my state (Utah) doxxing is illegal. Though, if someone is stupid enough to post hateful comments on the same platform as their business...well, I guess doxxing yourself is okay. This shooting hit pretty close to home for me. I've been to the campus many times, know professors there, two of my kids attended the school. I know students circulated petitions to ban Kirk from speaking. The actual petition to ban Kirk stated he "doesn't align with the college's value of inclusivity to all." Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes. Utah is a very conservative state (obviously) with pockets of liberals in the large cities and college campuses. The hate from the left in the local media (comment section), even here, is just sad. One has to wonder how many nuts out there read comments calling Trump Hitler and conservatives Nazis and decide, for the good of the world, to take action. Certainly one did yesterday.
  4. Today
  5. How is DOXING ppl for their beliefs/comments, regardless of how reprehensible they are, any different than what the left does? That's their MO, ruin the lives of ppl they disagree with.
  6. Yep, gloves off. Every one of these sick fucks (such as Mole’s vet example) should be doxxed, made to lose their jobs/unhireable, refused service at any business who knows about them, etc. They should not be assaulted or their property destroyed, but their easy lives should be made horribly difficult and intolerable. Fuck em.
  7. It's very hard to fight an asymmetric war and maintain your virtues. I hope all of those people get doxed. https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Assassination-Culture-Brief.pdf "These effects were driven by respondents that self-identified as left of center, with 48% and 55% at least somewhat justifying murder for Elon Musk and President Trump, respectively."
  8. Local Vet clinic owner is getting a lot of heat for his comments.
  9. The left is an unhinged cult. And to be clear, I’m not talking about the moderate dems who hold liberal beliefs on social services, health care, economics, etc. I’m talking about the large group on the left who cannot stand to hear someone doesn’t agree with them and subsequently wishes harm and ruin on them because of a differing opinion. That group is quite large. Time for people to wake up and actually hold these lunatics accountable for their rhetoric and actions.
  10. Lovely. Part of the sadness I feel about asinine comments like these, is that they are driven by the stereotype of Charlie Kirk, and not the facts. All you have to do is watch a few of the clips from his "encounters" and you discover he was none of the nasty things he's being called right now. The level of ignorance-fueled hate is, as always, unbelievable - but expected from the left.
  11. More gems from our thoughtful and compassionate friends on the left.
  12. But then they would have gone against a long standing tradition of skipping over a better weapon choice in favor of a Hellfire failing to achieve DWE!
  13. They should have used an AIM-9 for that blob of goo.
  14. Here in Utah, Governor Cox reminded the media that Utah has the death penalty. I wouldn't be surprised if the suspect is caught, both the state and the feds charge a capital case.
  15. I'm mostly on board with you. I don't think the death penalty should be public though, as it lowers us and I think would delegitimize our justice system by making a spectacle out of it. That's not necessary. Philosophically I have no issue with the death penalty. I also don't think it needs to be a deterrent to be a just punishment. Holding "deterrence" as a requisite for applying the death penalty is adopting the Left's frame. The death penalty is about revenge. It's an eye for an eye. It's about extracting the maximum amount of justice on behalf of the person who can no longer exact it for themselves. It hasn't got anything to do with deterring crime IMO. If deterrence is a side effect for those who are so base as to need to be deterred from heinous acts, then fine, but that's a bonus. Practically, there are many instances where the justice system has fallen short, however. Making it the case that the application of the death penalty is historically fraught.
  16. Yep. Why is Dylan Roof still alive 8 years after he was handed a death sentence!?!? He was caught red-handed and there isn't the slightest doubt as to his guilt but yet justice is delayed and delayed. And don't get me started on Sgt Hasan Akbar. 20 years!
  17. Yeah I might have gone too far in the shortness of a fair trial. But, they do have the whole murder on film so there is not much to defend (you got my point).
  18. I'm pro rule of law as well, and opposed to it taking years to convict a murderer. However, the answer to defending Americans' right to voice their opinions free from the risk of death is not to become China or nK in our execution of justice (i.e. a one day trial). Televising the execution might help. Especially if they request a firing squad.
  19. Tragic event made even more evil by those celebrating his death. Even “mainstream” media (e.g. cnn, msnbc, etc) seems to defend the Charlotte scumbag and now the Utah scumbag. We need speedy trials with public executions. The Charlotte guy should be executed next week (1 day trial - show video of him murdering) and when they prove who the Utah murderer is, publicly execute him immediately after the trial. 20 to 30 years on death row is not a deterrent.
  20. Yesterday
  21. Yeah, you may be on to something there..."berate" is a bit hyperbolic, but it possibly shows a willingness to ignore the situation until it became national news.
  22. Sort of. The answer is violence from the state. This is not new. The 60's had a *lot* of political violence. Hunt them and lock them up. Publicly and ruthlessly. If not, and where we agree, is that violence will be the response
  23. My views straddle both sides of the aisle and I try to be open but for F@cks Sake some of these Liberals are soulless humans. An MSNBC guest sickly speculated that the person who shot Charlie Kirk in the neck could have been one of his supporters firing a gun “in celebration.”Illinois Governor JB Pritzker is already blaming Trump for Charlie's death. What a disgusting blob of a human. An MSNBC guest sickly speculated that the person who shot Charlie Kirk in the neck could have been one of his supporters firing a gun “in celebration.” Another blames Kirk for saying words. On the floor of Congress another sickening display. And of course your typical liberals celebrating online.
  24. I would imagine there are thousands of fraternity houses cracking beers right now getting ready to party on campus for Charlie tonight.
  25. Not being flippant or justifying it, but the answer is violence. Look at history. What do you see?
  26. This is a really f’ing depressing. I don’t know how America recovers from the trajectory we’re on. Prayers for his wife and two daughters Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  27. Yes, sorry it was Dallager. Poor old fool looked like he was fit for the memory care unit when he was hauled in front of Congress.
  28. *Dallager But I agree with you otherwise. There is not a shred of principle in this man. He did more damage to the USAF than most, compounded because he made us believe in him.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...