Jump to content

Today in hypocrisy...

Clark Griswold

By Clark Griswold
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Biff_T Gray Beard

Biff_T

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TreeA10 said:

The really sad part is how language and definitions are getting warped or changed so I'm trying to wrap my brain around and decipher that language so my brain accepted"people protestors" and moved on without a second thought. 

“People” is offensive.  We have received guidance that the word people is to be replaced with non aquatic, upright walking, birthing and non birthing creatures who may or may not have a house (or legal immigration status).

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 591
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Sim
Sim
tac airlifter
tac airlifter
ClearedHot
ClearedHot

This should just become the entire hypocrisy thread... My favorite hypocrisy of the day from yesterday is the DUI arrest of Nancy Pelosi's husband.  Despite lawyers and multiple freedom of inform

Posted Images

VolFan SNAP

VolFan

Posted
Posted

From the article:

“Of Emanuel, who sold his home for $14.5 million after originally asking $25.9 million, the Timesnotes: “By selling before April, he saved roughly $800,000 he would have owed under ULA”

So he took a $10M+ haircut on the sale price to avoid paying $800K in taxes?  Real savvy financial move…

Clark Griswold Gray Beard

Clark Griswold

Posted
  • Author
Posted
From the article:
“Of Emanuel, who sold his home for $14.5 million after originally asking $25.9 million, the Timesnotes: “By selling before April, he saved roughly $800,000 he would have owed under ULA”
So he took a $10M+ haircut on the sale price to avoid paying $800K in taxes?  Real savvy financial move…

Yeah I read that and did a double take also, I suspect that was still a good price for the referenced limousine liberal selling before the tax took effect so while he didn’t make the Glen Gary money from this real estate sale he still must have made more money by selling at a lower price, either making money in gains or harvesting a depreciation and getting money back when he files his taxes, either way a rich leftist never pays full freight, that bullshit talking point about “paying your fair share” ends right at where they may have to pay their fair share
Conservatives duck taxes too but at least have the decency to say they are trying to do that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 1 month later...
Pooter Gray Beard

Pooter

Posted
Posted
On 7/9/2023 at 1:28 PM, Clark Griswold said:

They LOVE affordable housing just not in their neighborhood:

D.C.’s Chevy Chase neighborhood in uproar over affordable housing (msn.com)

Checked the political slant of the neighborhood, not a bit of red to be seen on the map...

Chevy Chase, Washington, DC Political Map – Democrat & Republican Areas in Chevy Chase | BestNeighborhood.org

Republicans don't hit on democrat NIMBY-ism nearly enough.
 

Bussing migrants sanctuary cities they ask to go to = cruel political stunt by evil Greg Abbott 

Turning a blind eye to small Republican border towns with no resources as they get complete overrun = "what border crisis??"

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Lord Ratner Gray Beard

Lord Ratner

Posted
Posted
On 6/6/2023 at 11:29 AM, VolFan said:

From the article:

“Of Emanuel, who sold his home for $14.5 million after originally asking $25.9 million, the Timesnotes: “By selling before April, he saved roughly $800,000 he would have owed under ULA”

So he took a $10M+ haircut on the sale price to avoid paying $800K in taxes?  Real savvy financial move…

The high-end real estate market got clobbered already, so it was never going to get back up to $25M. The $800k savings was just the push that made him realize $14.5M was a more realistic price.

  • 3 weeks later...
Biff_T Gray Beard

Biff_T

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, StoleIt said:

 

That was a risky click...but the TLDR of the article:

 

Is that a bonus hole or a shit factory? Lol.  I’m confused.  Inshalla….lol

  • Haha 1
bfargin Gray Beard

bfargin

Posted
Posted

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/66299441.amp

A woman claiming to be a man plays for Canada’s women’s national team at FIFA 2023 W.C.  She claims that she is a real man, but because she’s not good enough for men’s team, she plays for women’s team (can’t call her a woman though). So she’s both delusional and hypocritical.

HeloDude Gray Beard

HeloDude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, bfargin said:

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/66299441.amp

A woman claiming to be a man plays for Canada’s women’s national team at FIFA 2023 W.C.  She claims that she is a real man, but because she’s not good enough for men’s team, she plays for women’s team (can’t call her a woman though). So she’s both delusional and hypocritical.

Well, progressives can’t even define what a women is, so doesn’t this make us all non-XYZ, LGBTQxxxx, etc?

What I truly don’t understand is how the left will say they can’t define what a woman is, and just minutes later complain about woman rights?  

  • Upvote 3
Biff_T Gray Beard

Biff_T

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, jonlbs said:

“Reinforced by the players beard and a tattoo that read Biff loves soccer”

 @Biff_T  is this true?!

3f4881f51bcea28e4af627fd75c5808a.thumb.jpg.a33b9b37e54c3283e47ba0bd1d286f3e.jpg

The irony is,I started the Field Fairies thread lol.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
tac airlifter Gray Beard

tac airlifter

Posted
Posted

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/governor-bans-carrying-guns-in-albuquerque-after-11-year-old-killed/article_a02a0b24-4e59-11ee-85ee-db977338b047.html
 

NM Governor bans legal carrying of weapons to prevent criminals from committing illegal shootings.  Of course she herself enjoys armed protective guards, but you aren't allowed the same privileges.  The order cites Gun violence as a public health emergency, and is only for 30 days to flatten to curve.  
 

Can't make this up, democrats are the party of tyrants.

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 3
pawnman Gray Beard

pawnman

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, tac airlifter said:

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/governor-bans-carrying-guns-in-albuquerque-after-11-year-old-killed/article_a02a0b24-4e59-11ee-85ee-db977338b047.html
 

NM Governor bans legal carrying of weapons to prevent criminals from committing illegal shootings.  Of course she herself enjoys armed protective guards, but you aren't allowed the same privileges.  The order cites Gun violence as a public health emergency, and is only for 30 days to flatten to curve.  
 

Can't make this up, democrats are the party of tyrants.

I don't see that one standing up in the Supreme Court. 

Biff_T Gray Beard

Biff_T

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Clark Griswold said:

Open borders for your state not mine

Report: Joe Biden Considers Requiring Illegal Aliens to Remain in Texas

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2023/09/08/report-joe-biden-considers-requiring-illegal-aliens-to-remain-in-texas/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think its funny.  Being a Californian, I think Texas should keep bussing them here and everywhere else in the US.  Its funny watching the "leaders" lose their mind trying to explain why we can't handle more "illegals" all the while acting like we don't have a problem.  Its not the "they're taking our jobs" aspect, there isnt much hope there either.  I see quite a few "undocumented people" living in Coyote Creek by my house.   They aren't coming here and getting easy jobs as much as they used to (economic problems, here in the US, no, it can't be).  It's more of escaping an even shittier life than living in a ditch by Biff's house.  

I don't care about the illegal immigrant problem, I care more about the hypocrisy coming out of the liberal mouths that claim we can help, when we actually can't anymore.   If we (CA) can't handle a bus of Spaniards shipped from Texas, admit that there is a problem.  Fucking idiots rule the US.  I wish I was exaggerating. 

Edited by Biff_T
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
tac airlifter Gray Beard

tac airlifter

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, pawnman said:

I don't see that one standing up in the Supreme Court. 

It will take years to get there, if ever, and too bad for anyone arrested in the meantime (loss of security clearance is a real possibility for our bros in ABQ).  Not to mention anyone killed by a criminal who has lost the official right to defend themselves.  There will never be any personal consequences for the tyrant democrats issuing anti-constitutional dictates.

 There’s a school of thought that the constitution is our unifying philosophy and any changes/limits should be addressed via legislative branch in a manner the constitution itself allows for.  There’s a competing school of thought that once we have power we should just do what we want and see if anyone is willing & able to pushback.  Might makes right, if you will.  If you want to sue to stop it, go ahead and try… but expect the FBI to interview extended family, the NSA to search your browsing history and share with The NY Times, the IRS to audit you with a fine tooth comb, etc.  All of those things have happened to those who push back (what happened to Tea Party members 10-12 years ago was criminal).

If you follow this to its logical conclusion, the next step will be separating families for teaching hate speech.  Already happening in Canada.  We do not live in a free country anymore.

 

  • Upvote 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...