February 5, 20251 yr 2014 seems to be a VERY important year. Hence why PRE-EMPTIVE BIDEN PARDONS are all backdated to 2014. another coincidence I’m sure
February 12, 20251 yr Study claims harms of COVID-19 vaccines 'profoundly outweighed' benefits; calls for moratorium on mRNA shots
January 24Jan 24 I think both Fauci and Mayorkas should both be in prison for the rest of their lives.
Wednesday at 01:11 PM2 days On 1/24/2026 at 5:04 PM, bfargin said:I think both Fauci and Mayorkas should both be in prison for the rest of their lives.He’s sitting in front of congress pleading the 5th right now. The covid saga can’t be allowed to be buried in the pages of history. We must know the truth.
Wednesday at 02:16 PM2 days One must ask why Dr. Fauci would invoke the Fifth Amendment if he has already received a pardon.For years, the American people were told to simply trust the experts. Yet serious questions remain about the origins of COVID-19, gain-of-function research, and what government officials knew and when they knew it. Dr. Fauci has faced sustained criticism over his public statements regarding U.S. funding of research involving coronaviruses and whether that research met the definition of gain-of-function. Those questions deserve transparency and honest answers.A pardon does not answer those questions. It does not explain decisions that affected millions of lives, businesses, schools, and families. If there is nothing more to hide, the American people deserve a full accounting of what happened.History should be based on facts, transparency, and accountability—not unanswered questions.AQNK_aTkporUih4exAkCb4CZe5umWiAzpJXSoLKyNJ7_7WCENZvo-jtrC2eNglWkHIQAchR6A6HujgZiB6LOkP-ar5z6PMI8hk3I18wkzTWxBg.mp4
13 hours ago13 hr Isn’t it amazing how F’d up our politics/government is—we can’t agree on anything substantial.
13 hours ago13 hr On 7/29/2026 at 10:16 AM, ClearedHot said:One must ask why Dr. Fauci would invoke the Fifth Amendment if he has already received a pardon.Why would he answer anything? Dude has his pardon...saying ANYTHING would only jeopardize that possibly lead to perjury. This was just a dog and pony show to make media clips. Anyone believing he was gonna say anything of substance, well I have an ocean front house in Wichita to sell you.
11 hours ago11 hr There is a case, Brown v Walker (1896) where it is affirmed by the Supreme Court that “([I]f the witness has already received a pardon, he cannot longer set up his privilege (ie claiming the Fifth), since he stands, with respect to such offense, as if it had never been committed.).http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep161/usrep161591/usrep161591.pdfWhile I agree, some liberties were taken to grandstand and make a point of embarrassing the guy, he should have answered any questions asked within the scope of his pardon. Not doing so has just guaranteed that there will be further attempts, using the above ruling, to try and enforce penalties for his refusal to answer.
Create an account or sign in to comment