COVID-19 (Aka China Virus)

[ViperStud]

Bashi, take Trump’s dick out of your mouth for 5 seconds and look at the world around you. 

[Boomer6]

15 hours ago, ViperStud said:

Bashi, take Trump’s dick out of your mouth for 5 seconds and look at the world around you. 

@pawnman like this post all you want. You’re just as bad as Bashi, only you’re on the opposite side. I’m curious how many ROTC kids you screwed over for reluctance to take the shot before it was mandatory.

[BashiChuni]

16 hours ago, hindsight2020 said:

holy jesús carpintero on a mule cart, now the Ukrainian flag is a proxy for covid lockdown sycophant ? the anti-vaxxxers have officially jumped the shark. 

The point my friend is to illustrate how easily people are manipulated to jump 100% on whatever cause the media declares. It’s not necessarily a proxy, but there is definitely a common thread between Ukraine die hards and COVID die hards 

[BashiChuni]

15 hours ago, ViperStud said:

Bashi, take Trump’s dick out of your mouth for 5 seconds and look at the world around you. 

Trump isn’t even my choice for 2024 lol in fact I got a lot of beef w trump IRT COVID lockdowns, Fauci, and the vax 

[BashiChuni]

https://nypost.com/2023/09/02/fauci-admits-lack-of-covid-mask-evidence-but-still-wants-us-to-wear-them/

[Sim]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/cdc-fda-ignored-u-s-military-investigation-revealing/

 

 

Quote

Non-profit organization ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) has obtained new documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). These documents shed light on the disregard by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) towards a U.S. military investigation that reportedly indicated vaccine failures as early as January 2021.

The FOIA documents, made public by ICAN, suggest that the CDC and FDA may have overlooked crucial information regarding the efficacy of vaccines. According to ICAN’s findings, a U.S. military investigation conducted in January 2021 apparently revealed signs of vaccine failures. However, the CDC and FDA allegedly failed to acknowledge or address these concerns adequately.

 

 

 

 

[Sim]

https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-vaccinated-higher-risk-covid-than-unvaxxed/

 

Quote

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that Americans who have received mRNA shots for Covid are now at a higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than those who are unvaccinated.

Safe and effective, yo! 

[herkbum]

https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-vaccinated-higher-risk-covid-than-unvaxxed/
 

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that Americans who have received mRNA shots for Covid are now at a higher risk of infection from new variants of the virus than those who are unvaccinated.

Safe and effective, yo! 


And they want me to get another one! No way in hell. Just another reason I regret taking the Moderna before I retired.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

[hindsight2020]

My LTE reception was pretty solid after taking the Pfizer. Would recommend again.

It's the J&J one that I saw giving people pentecostal leg syndrome...🤣

 

[Mark1]

1 hour ago, Sim said:

https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-vaccinated-higher-risk-covid-than-unvaxxed/

 

Safe and effective, yo! 

Do you make a habit of reading the first paragraph of every Slaynews article and stopping there?

Funny that they recognize their clientele is so helplessly stupid that simply embedding hyperlinks into their stories will give enough appearance of legitimacy to do the job.  'Our clientele will assume there's a mountain of bullet proof anti-vax dogma behind those links, so it wouldn't matter if they all pointed towards yourethemannowdog.com'.

Why don't follow the link they provide to their source for this admission in order to see that it is literally fabricated out of thin air?

For a group that demands so much 'accountability' from the vaccine Gestapo, you certainly have low standards elsewhere.

Did you stop reading your T.O. when you got past the first paragraph that said nothing within the document precluded the operator from deviating from procedures for safety of flight considerations?  It's fucking scary that people with this level of discernment are trusted to operate complicated machinery.

[Sim]

8 minutes ago, Mark1 said:

Do you make a habit of reading

Do you? 

Quote

BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines. 

https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/whats-new/covid-19-variant.html

[brabus]

@cleared_hot Who’s mandating boosters?

Edited September 5, 2023 by brabus

[Mark1]

17 minutes ago, Sim said:

Do you? 

https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/whats-new/covid-19-variant.html

Holy. Fucking. Shit.

You read that line and said to yourself, 'there it is right there'?

I misunderstood what we were dealing with here.  I thought it was somebody who was happy to turn a blind eye and go along with anything if it happened to support a bias of theirs. Upon closer inspection it's not willful ignorance, but substandard cognitive and comprehension ability.  My mistake, bless your heart.

You, specifically, are good to continue reading only the first paragraph of Slaynews articles.  Carry on.

[Sim]

@Mark1  So you disagree with CDC? What a naughty NPC you are. 

[Day Man]

16 minutes ago, Mark1 said:

Holy. Fucking. Shit.

You read that line and said to yourself, 'there it is right there'?

I misunderstood what we were dealing with here.  I thought it was somebody who was happy to turn a blind eye and go along with anything if it happened to support a bias of theirs. Upon closer inspection it's not willful ignorance, but substandard cognitive and comprehension ability.  My mistake, bless your heart.

You, specifically, are good to continue reading only the first paragraph of Slaynews articles.  Carry on.

i think you were looking for this

[Pooter]

4 hours ago, Sim said:

https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-vaccinated-higher-risk-covid-than-unvaxxed/

 

Safe and effective, yo! 

Dude it's this kind of crap that totally undermines your position. 
 

1. slaynews.com  wow a real bastion of reputable journalism there.  Totally not  clickbait garbage at the bottom of an OAN page

2. article links to a CDC study and then wholesale misrepresents what the study says. Which you would know if you had clicked the link and read the source material. 
 

What the CDC study actually says: a new variant of covid has a higher potential to infect people who've had the shot or who have ever had a covid infection. 

So no, it isn't a question of vaxxed vs unvaxxed. It's higher for anyone who has had any immune response to anything covid related before be that a shot or a previous variant.. which is as near as makes no difference the entire US population. 

I love how we're the ones that are supposed to eat crow while you guys conduct a bi-weekly circle jerk to whatever bias-confirming dumpster clickbait you can find.

[Pooter]

Also I learned today that @Sim does trust CDC findings, but only when (he thinks) they line up with what he already believes. 
 

Next week on Magnificent Displays of Critical Thinking: a soccer player collapsed in Greece, do we all have myocarditis?!

[Biff_T]

Covid's gay!  

That is all. 

[GrndPndr]

1 hour ago, Biff_T said:

Covid's gay!  

That is all. 

Yep, and Jill Biden has it, as does Whooopie Goldb.  It's already started folks, it might be entertaining to see who comes out with it next.  Get on the bandwagon while you can, it's going to be a frolicking good COVID Halloween!  (Coming to an election near you).

[Biff_T]

Replace everything Covid related with the word gay.  It will make your day a little better.  Lol

Edit: and if you're gay, it will make your day a little gayer lol

Edit 2: "Did you get gay last winter?  A bunch people I know from the office got gay.  I sure hope I don't catch gay again, it hurt last time".  Dude at office

"I hear the gay shot makes you sick and it doesn't even stop you from getting gay."  Rachel Maddow MSNBC

"I support your right to wear a mask if you're scared of getting that nasty new gay variant."  A.P. Hill CSA

Lol

Edited September 6, 2023 by Biff_T
Spelling bee failure

[FourFans]

Apparently we learned nothing in the past 3 years.  Fun fact refreshers:

- According to Johns Hopkins It takes 5-10 years to completely develop and study a vaccine.  History tells us it take longer then that.  Logic says it takes 20 years to do a 20 year study on the 20 year impact of a vaccine....weird.  It's been 3 since this show all started.  

- Modern news agencies exist to do one thing: Make Money...which they do by getting us to click...which they do by posting scary stories.

- Politicians want a crisis during an election.  This should shock no one.  Stop feeding into the real enemy's game (politicians trying to polarize their bases).  They don't care about you, they just want to retain or gain power.

Everyone chill out.

Frankly, I think @Biff_T has the right line here.  Can we somehow link the word replacement game with a drinking game?

Edited September 6, 2023 by FourFans

[BashiChuni]

Pawnman just curious are you wearing a mask again?

[brabus]

Honestly who cares. Individuals can do whatever they want WRT masks, vax, etc. If anything, the masks serve as a high probable ID criteria for all the idiots out there who haven’t learned a damn thing in the last 3.69 years. 

[Biff_T]

The only way I'm wearing a mask again is if it's a leather one and I happen to be with 6 LBFMs somewhere in Asia.  

Or outside at the bus stop lol

 

[O Face]

 

54 minutes ago, Biff_T said:

The only way I'm wearing a mask again is if it's a leather one and I happen to be with 6 LBFMs somewhere in Asia.  

Or outside at the bus stop lol

 

I’d wear those bikini bottoms as a mask…I believe you said, in another thread, you wanted to keep talking about her.