HeyEng Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 (edited) There is also an issue with the engine anti-ice. The LEAP engine nacelle lip uses more composite materials than the legacy nacelles and can catastrophically fail if the anti-ice is left on in dry conditions for more than five minutes! The AD warns this could result in “an un-powered off-field landing”! https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/10/2023-17197/airworthiness-directives-the-boeing-company-airplanes Edited February 8 by HeyEng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 There is also an issue with the engine anti-ice. The LEAP engine nacelle lip uses more composite materials than the legacy nacelles and can catastrophically fail if the anti-ice is left on in dry conditions for more than five minutes! The AD warns this could result in “an un-powered off-field landing”! https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/10/2023-17197/airworthiness-directives-the-boeing-company-airplanesYeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HossHarris Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Yup. Nobody ever forgets to turn it off …. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ratner Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 3 hours ago, SurelySerious said: Yeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker. 2 hours ago, HossHarris said: Yup. Nobody ever forgets to turn it off …. Lol, exactly. Forgetting to turn off the anti-ice for 5 minutes and you get a total engine failure? That's the definition of a "real shocker." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nunya Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 55 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: Lol, exactly. Forgetting to turn off the anti-ice for 5 minutes and you get a total engine failure? That's the definition of a "real shocker." 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 post of the year so far ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ hahahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeyEng Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 5 hours ago, SurelySerious said: Yeah…but it shouldn’t be on without visible moisture or a contaminated surface, so this damage occurs outside of proper system operation. Not a real shocker. And of course anti-ice valves never stick in the open position! Boeing has auto anti-ice systems that automatically turn on and off during icing conditions but to maintain the same type rating as legacy 737 aircraft, these type of systems are not installed on the Max. The Max with the LEAP engines should have had a new type certificate but Southwest would have not have purchased the aircraft to begin with and so Boeing did a lot of pounding a square peg in a round hole to emulate handling characteristics of legacy 737. Even the NG had a different wing and cruised faster than the 100 to 600 aircraft and it could be argued that Boeing should have changed the type certification back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 It never ends with this POS. US FAA mandates Boeing 737 MAX rudder loose bolt inspections Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 Boeing may be prosecuted after breaking safety agreement that prevented criminal charges for 737 crashes, US DOJ says Alleging that Boeing lied (shocker), about safety changed that were made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Boeing may be prosecuted after breaking safety agreement that prevented criminal charges for 737 crashes, US DOJ says Alleging that Boeing lied (shocker), about safety changed that were made. Good. Maybe we can actually hold Boeing accountable for making pieces of shit both for the USAF and civilian world. Monopolies are not good for competition and and definitely not good for making end products that are safe and effective vs. a product that constantly needs more work to function as advertised. Fuck Boeing. They are not as good as they think they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herkbier Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 Too big to fail, or be meaningfully punished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inertia17 Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 22 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Boeing may be prosecuted after breaking safety agreement that prevented criminal charges for 737 crashes, US DOJ says Alleging that Boeing lied (shocker), about safety changed that were made. Definitely wouldn't want to be a witness on that trial. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntledemployee Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted May 17 Share Posted May 17 (edited) 15 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: If it ain't Boeing, it ain't going....to make it through the flight without losing a part. Edited May 17 by Biff_T Fat fingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now