This is going to be wild, walked back very quickly, or includes large exceptions to the point it’s not really a big deal/he gets what he wants.

The FAA right now:

If the aforementioned Gulfstreams are certified in the US and EU, expect some posturing from Canada followed by quiet but swift certification of the planes. That's my bet

Tariff on new builds only

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

1 hour ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

At this point does it matter?

that's up to you bro

4 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

Cliffs' Notes?

It's pretty low on my list of priorities, but I'm sure whatever was in there must have been real devastating if I'm only hearing about it on this forum...

6 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

At this point, its very safe to say that NOBODY is getting got off of this. It involves way too many folks from every powerful background. The mainstream media isn't even touching it. The only coverage is on X. It's impossible to trust anything.

8 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

What juicy nuggets are in there for us to digest? Give us the download. Is Trump an alien?

13 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

What would you like us to discuss?

News I've seen is that the latest "dump" is some x millions of pages, or along those lines. Not clear to me if that is indexed and searchable, one big file labeled Epstein.pdf, or what.

So far, only story I've seen is something about Bill Gates getting an STD from a Russian? hooker.

I keep seeing people trying desperately to tie Trump into Epstein's depravity, but I haven't seen anything conclusive.

Thousand or so emails between Epstein and Peter Attia 😬

2 hours ago, Blue said:

I keep seeing people trying desperately to tie Trump into Epstein's depravity, but I haven't seen anything conclusive.

The funny thing is they want it so bad, but haven’t connected the simple dots that the Biden cabal (including Merrick Garland) had these files. They did everything possible to destroy Trump to prevent him from running, including a massive, politically-motivated purge attempt resulting in a sham trial…but yeah, it’s completely plausible they just sat on a portion of the Epstein files that would have conclusively implicated Trump in something that would have easily crushed his electability.

41 minutes ago, brabus said:

The funny thing is they want it so bad, but haven’t connected the simple dots that the Biden cabal (including Merrick Garland) had these files. They did everything possible to destroy Trump to prevent him from running, including a massive, politically-motivated purge attempt resulting in a sham trial…but yeah, it’s completely plausible they just sat on a portion of the Epstein files that would have conclusively implicated Trump in something that would have easily crushed his electability.

Maybe it was deemed the "nuclear" option and might have triggered political "M.A.D."

2 hours ago, BFM this said:

Thousand or so emails between Epstein and Peter Attia 😬

While his son was in the icu from heart failure…apparently his wife begged hum to come home but he wanted to chill w Epstein…..idk why but attia seemed like a dbag with his longevity bs

40 minutes ago, Swizzle said:

Maybe it was deemed the "nuclear" option and might have triggered political "M.A.D."

I doubt it for two reasons:

1. They’ve proved they will do anything to make him go away, and I don’t think burning some senators, etc. would have been enough to stop them prior to the election (there was an assassination attempt after all)

2. If it existed they could have easily released that portion of the files (in addition to others, including some low level D cannon fodder, to make it not look targeted)

So your theory is certainly possible (I’ve thought it myself before), but also highly unlikely.

Something came out it

Fing unreal

2 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Fing unreal

This is the mainstream Dem party - destroy/kill anybody who isn’t in lock step with “their truth” (e.g. alternate reality) and values (or lack there of in my opinion).

Republicans have a whole host of problems of course, but at least one of them is not wishing and implementing destruction and death on everyone who even slightly disagrees with them.

4 hours ago, brabus said:

This is the mainstream Trump party - destroy/kill anybody who isn’t in lock step with “their truth” (e.g. alternate reality) and values (or lack there of in my opinion).

🤣 FIFY

She's just using the Trump playbook. Remember everyone fired for doing their jobs, like the Feds ordered to investigate Trump on, oh, let's see... TS files, hooker bribes, Jan 6th, and stuff.

Oh man, I got a really good laugh out of this one.

PS, no idea who the lady is or that I support. Just seeing the irony of the pots and kettles doing the same thing.

1 hour ago, disgruntledemployee said:

🤣 FIFY

She's just using the Trump playbook. Remember everyone fired for doing their jobs, like the Feds ordered to investigate Trump on, oh, let's see... TS files, hooker bribes, Jan 6th, and stuff.

Oh man, I got a really good laugh out of this one.

PS, no idea who the lady is or that I support. Just seeing the irony of the pots and kettles doing the same thing.

Are you high? Which party generally aligns with rioting, destruction of property, literally celebrating when someone they don’t like is murdered, lose their minds at anybody who disagrees with them, etc. Which party do people generally align with who threaten one’s livelihood and/or life simply for having a different opinion?

It is by a large margin the Democrat party. It’s not a zero sum game, so you would be wrong to assume this means I think the GOP is awesome and without issues. But you are absolutely retarded if you can’t admit one party’s followers/aligners are substantially more violent and destructive when it comes to how they act towards those with differing viewpoints. And no, that doesn’t mean everyone who’s not a Republican fits that mold, we’re talking overall big picture.

On 2/1/2026 at 6:25 PM, arg said:

At this point does it matter?

Does a potential conspiracy from world leaders where a large portion all were involved in child rape for years matter? It sure did back when Qanon said that a liberal cabal was doing it. I’d say from the stance of someone with a shred of morality that it matters. You gonna really try to take this road? “Does potential unpunished child rape matter?”

On 2/1/2026 at 9:23 PM, Lord Ratner said:

Cliffs' Notes?

It's pretty low on my list of priorities, but I'm sure whatever was in there must have been real devastating if I'm only hearing about it on this forum...

You all have been reading biased news and sticking your head in the sand. You can read the files yourself. They are on the justice.gov websites. Why do some people have a tendency to want to not trust the news and instead trust dude bro podcasters when it comes to things like COVID #doyourownresearch, but then they do nothing/fall in line when it comes to things that could “hurt their worldview” like the Epstein files?

It’s intentional so they can not have to challenge their preconceptions and/or go against their tribe. You and they are receiving a strong push from those you align with that you will not be perceived well if you buy into this. The message is to just ignore it, don’t look at it, don’t think about it. You guys are smarter than that.

As a reminder, the house is forcing Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify. Do you think what’s in the Epstein files is worse, the same, or better for Clinton than for other political idols? You think these files just say Clinton? Not even close.

What exists? Heinous accusations from NTOC. Here’s just a couple (could have easily include 5-10 times this number of screenshots):

Signed depositions with dozens of pages of declared alleged abuse.

Clear phone records where Trumps phone number dials Epsteins phone number well past the mid 2005 story that has been told.

Blackmail from Epstein alleging Bill Gates got an STD from a Russian girl.

More formally submitted allegations about abuse of a child:

Multiple times where Elon Musk directly asked to go to the island for “wild parties” and Epstein said he would get him a heli, directly contradicting Elons statements. Oh is it weird you haven’t seen that on X much?

Official declassified FBI intelligence marked Secret//NF tying Epstein to both Israeli and Russian foreign influence operations:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01683874.pdf

Many sources commenting on multiple high profile people such as Trump, Israeli PM, Dershowitz, Bush, Clinton, etc. could be compromised at various levels.

This is pulled directly from the justice.gov website. There are literally millions more.

There are good reasons why many are arguing that an apolitical look and investigation of people such as Trump, Clinton, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Andrew Mountbatten, Richard Branson, etc. are warranted. Of course there’s not a smoking gun. They gonna release a video of all these people abusing a child? That’s not the argument. The argument here is: is there sufficient evidence to support an investigation to substantiate or clear these claims? We know there were more abusers than just Epstein.

My recommendation: take a breather on the media propaganda they are trying to have you consume - it’s trying to make you think one way without literally any evidence. Look at the files yourself. Why would the media, who is owned exclusively by billionaires who benefit from the status quo, go out of their way to break this story? If you don’t get it yet, they want the system as it is.

Also, dont play politics with child rape conspiracies. And stop trying to make this a liberal v conservative slugfest. You come off like someone who can’t read or form any of their own thoughts.

The evidence in the files is much worse than any obtuse outside podcaster/talk radio argument they’re trying to feed you. And it’s not just one person or one party. It’s everyone that is rich. Honestly, the one thing I took away from this is that wealth of that magnitude corrupts humans. On top of that, this is just what they have intentionally released so far. There are millions of files, pictures, and videos that they have not.

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by Negat0ry

1 hour ago, Negat0ry said:

Does a potential conspiracy from world leaders where a large portion all were involved in child rape for years matter? It sure did back when Qanon said that a liberal cabal was doing it. I’d say from the stance of someone with a shred of morality that it matters. You gonna really try to take this road? “Does potential unpunished child rape matter?”

It matters insomuch as your ability and willingness to do anything about it.

Therefore, it still does not matter.

Keep voting.

11 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

🤣 FIFY

She's just using the Trump playbook. Remember everyone fired for doing their jobs, like the Feds ordered to investigate Trump on, oh, let's see... TS files, hooker bribes, Jan 6th, and stuff.

Oh man, I got a really good laugh out of this one.

PS, no idea who the lady is or that I support. Just seeing the irony of the pots and kettles doing the same thing

You used to serve as a good counterpoint to the obviously conservative tone on this forum, but you’ve drifted into an ideologue spewing outright falsehoods...you can't admit a single fault with the actions on the left.

Most people on here have been clear they disagree with plenty of what Trump says. That’s not in dispute.

What is disconnected from reality is your insinuation that the “party of Trump” is poised to destroy or kill anyone who isn’t in lockstep with some imagined orthodoxy.

Let’s talk about actual violence, not vibes.

Which side burned entire city blocks, torched police stations, and caused billions in damage during the 2020 riots—riots that left dozens dead?
Which side created “autonomous zones” enforced by armed mobs where people were shot and killed?
Which side spent years firebombing courthouses and attacking federal buildings in places like Portland?
Which side shot up a congressional baseball practice after being radicalized by partisan rhetoric?
Which side regularly labels ICE agents “Nazis,” a term historically used to justify violence against them?
Which side cheers assaults on political opponents as “punching Nazis” when the definition of “Nazi” seems to be “anyone who disagrees”?
Which side shot Trump in the ear, nearly missing his brain stem? Then tried again on a golf course?

Political violence is wrong—full stop. But pretending it’s some uniquely right-wing phenomenon while ignoring years of documented left-wing rioting, assaults, and intimidation isn’t principled. It’s willful blindness.

If you want to criticize Trump or Republicans, fine. Plenty do, including people here. But rewriting recent history to paint one side as uniquely violent while memory-holing the other is exactly the kind of bad-faith argument you used to push back against.

You can do better than that.

You Shacked him CH!