This is going to be wild, walked back very quickly, or includes large exceptions to the point it’s not really a big deal/he gets what he wants.

The FAA right now:

If the aforementioned Gulfstreams are certified in the US and EU, expect some posturing from Canada followed by quiet but swift certification of the planes. That's my bet

Tariff on new builds only

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

1 hour ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

At this point does it matter?

that's up to you bro

4 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

Cliffs' Notes?

It's pretty low on my list of priorities, but I'm sure whatever was in there must have been real devastating if I'm only hearing about it on this forum...

6 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

At this point, its very safe to say that NOBODY is getting got off of this. It involves way too many folks from every powerful background. The mainstream media isn't even touching it. The only coverage is on X. It's impossible to trust anything.

8 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

What juicy nuggets are in there for us to digest? Give us the download. Is Trump an alien?

13 hours ago, Day Man said:

Crickets after the latest Epstein file dump? Weird.

What would you like us to discuss?

News I've seen is that the latest "dump" is some x millions of pages, or along those lines. Not clear to me if that is indexed and searchable, one big file labeled Epstein.pdf, or what.

So far, only story I've seen is something about Bill Gates getting an STD from a Russian? hooker.

I keep seeing people trying desperately to tie Trump into Epstein's depravity, but I haven't seen anything conclusive.

Thousand or so emails between Epstein and Peter Attia 😬

2 hours ago, Blue said:

I keep seeing people trying desperately to tie Trump into Epstein's depravity, but I haven't seen anything conclusive.

The funny thing is they want it so bad, but haven’t connected the simple dots that the Biden cabal (including Merrick Garland) had these files. They did everything possible to destroy Trump to prevent him from running, including a massive, politically-motivated purge attempt resulting in a sham trial…but yeah, it’s completely plausible they just sat on a portion of the Epstein files that would have conclusively implicated Trump in something that would have easily crushed his electability.

41 minutes ago, brabus said:

The funny thing is they want it so bad, but haven’t connected the simple dots that the Biden cabal (including Merrick Garland) had these files. They did everything possible to destroy Trump to prevent him from running, including a massive, politically-motivated purge attempt resulting in a sham trial…but yeah, it’s completely plausible they just sat on a portion of the Epstein files that would have conclusively implicated Trump in something that would have easily crushed his electability.

Maybe it was deemed the "nuclear" option and might have triggered political "M.A.D."

2 hours ago, BFM this said:

Thousand or so emails between Epstein and Peter Attia 😬

While his son was in the icu from heart failure…apparently his wife begged hum to come home but he wanted to chill w Epstein…..idk why but attia seemed like a dbag with his longevity bs

40 minutes ago, Swizzle said:

Maybe it was deemed the "nuclear" option and might have triggered political "M.A.D."

I doubt it for two reasons:

1. They’ve proved they will do anything to make him go away, and I don’t think burning some senators, etc. would have been enough to stop them prior to the election (there was an assassination attempt after all)

2. If it existed they could have easily released that portion of the files (in addition to others, including some low level D cannon fodder, to make it not look targeted)

So your theory is certainly possible (I’ve thought it myself before), but also highly unlikely.

Something came out it

Fing unreal

2 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Fing unreal

This is the mainstream Dem party - destroy/kill anybody who isn’t in lock step with “their truth” (e.g. alternate reality) and values (or lack there of in my opinion).

Republicans have a whole host of problems of course, but at least one of them is not wishing and implementing destruction and death on everyone who even slightly disagrees with them.

4 hours ago, brabus said:

This is the mainstream Trump party - destroy/kill anybody who isn’t in lock step with “their truth” (e.g. alternate reality) and values (or lack there of in my opinion).

🤣 FIFY

She's just using the Trump playbook. Remember everyone fired for doing their jobs, like the Feds ordered to investigate Trump on, oh, let's see... TS files, hooker bribes, Jan 6th, and stuff.

Oh man, I got a really good laugh out of this one.

PS, no idea who the lady is or that I support. Just seeing the irony of the pots and kettles doing the same thing.

1 hour ago, disgruntledemployee said:

🤣 FIFY

She's just using the Trump playbook. Remember everyone fired for doing their jobs, like the Feds ordered to investigate Trump on, oh, let's see... TS files, hooker bribes, Jan 6th, and stuff.

Oh man, I got a really good laugh out of this one.

PS, no idea who the lady is or that I support. Just seeing the irony of the pots and kettles doing the same thing.

Are you high? Which party generally aligns with rioting, destruction of property, literally celebrating when someone they don’t like is murdered, lose their minds at anybody who disagrees with them, etc. Which party do people generally align with who threaten one’s livelihood and/or life simply for having a different opinion?

It is by a large margin the Democrat party. It’s not a zero sum game, so you would be wrong to assume this means I think the GOP is awesome and without issues. But you are absolutely retarded if you can’t admit one party’s followers/aligners are substantially more violent and destructive when it comes to how they act towards those with differing viewpoints. And no, that doesn’t mean everyone who’s not a Republican fits that mold, we’re talking overall big picture.