The Next President is...

[Homestar]

36 minutes ago, M2 said:

To be fair, no one could predict the level of shenanigans surrounding this "election"...

Please. 

[kaputt]

6 minutes ago, slackline said:

Maybe I can't read good and stuff, but I just went to her page, saw nothing like this.  Although she is pushing the GND which is ridiculous at best!

“Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? ”

[slackline]

5 minutes ago, kaputt said:

“Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? ”

Please provide a link.  Her twitter feed shows nothing like that.

 

Look, I can do what you did: "I, Donald Trump, hereby and forthwith concede that I lost, and there were no shenanigans.  I made all that up!"  See, easy...

 

ETA: reading the quote you attribute to her, what's wrong with that?  Lindsey Graham should be forced to watch video of himself calling Trump all sorts of nasty things nonstop, until he was the President.  Then, acting like he was the GOP's savior.  Being shown their hypocrisy would be a good thing for them...

 

Edited November 7, 2020 by slackline

[kaputt]

2 minutes ago, slackline said:

Please provide a link.  Her twitter feed shows nothing like that.

 

Look, I can do what you did: "I, Donald Trump, hereby and forthwith concede that I lost, and there were no shenanigans.  I made all that up!"  See, easy...

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/AOC/status/1324807776510595078
 

What incentive would I have to make that up? 

[slackline]

1 minute ago, kaputt said:

https://mobile.twitter.com/AOC/status/1324807776510595078
 

What incentive would I have to make that up? 

I guess I don't understand Twitter because the link you provided, at least show me, a timestamp of 3:18.  You first posted this almost 25 minutes ago.  How's that work?  Does the timestamp refresh for the person looking at it.  If not, you're reposting a fake tweet because her page doesn't show it.  Totally possible I don't understand Twitter.  First time I ever went to the site.

 

I still ask, what's wrong with the question.  Take note of the hypocrites...

 

[N730]

“Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? ”

I never read that as trying to get a list of the 70M voters of his. I'm pretty sure shes referring to politicians.

People like McConnel, Cruz, Graham, etc. tore Trump to shreds in public until he won the nomination, then he was the greatest thing that's ever happened to the country. They will 100% act like they never supported hum and claim they fought against him as soon as it helps them politically.

But, to be fair, that's the game. I wish we could get rid of 99% of the people in DC and get people that actually care about the country in office, but that's never going to happen. I know this is preaching to the choir, but we desperately need term limits.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Baseops Network mobile app

[N730]

I guess I don't understand Twitter because the link you provided, at least show me, a timestamp of 3:18.  You first posted this almost 25 minutes ago.  How's that work?  Does the timestamp refresh for the person looking at it.  If not, you're reposting a fake tweet because her page doesn't show it.  Totally possible I don't understand Twitter.  First time I ever went to the site.
 
I still ask, what's wrong with the question.  Take note of the hypocrites...
 

It's from yesterday. Jesus, she tweets as much as Trump does. I hate the politicians have become so reliant on Twitter. I've never seen it make anyone appear smart.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Baseops Network mobile app

[VMFA187]

2 minutes ago, N730 said:

It's from yesterday. Jesus, she tweets as much as Trump does. I hate the politicians have become so reliant on Twitter. I've never seen it make anyone appear smart.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Baseops Network mobile app

 

He's from the School of Kids Who Don't Read Good. 

 

LMAO. Date 06 Nov 2020. 

[VMFA187]

 

Didn’t the Democratic Party fight the 2016 election until now?

Edited November 7, 2020 by VMFA187

[Prozac]

43 minutes ago, VMFA187 said:

AOC is calling for a list of names of those who supported the current President according to her recent Tweets. I seem to recall something like that from history class...

Source/link?

[VMFA187]

1 minute ago, Prozac said:

Source/link?

Look 2" above your post. 

[Prozac]

I see “@JRubinBlogger” making some sort of statement about a “list”. I don’t know who she is, nor do I give two fucks about what she says. You stated “AOC is calling for a list of names of those who supported the current President according to her recent Tweets”. I still see no evidence of AOC calling for said list. 

[VMFA187]

28 minutes ago, slackline said:

Please provide a link.  Her twitter feed shows nothing like that.

 

Look, I can do what you did: "I, Donald Trump, hereby and forthwith concede that I lost, and there were no shenanigans.  I made all that up!"  See, easy...

 

ETA: reading the quote you attribute to her, what's wrong with that?  Lindsey Graham should be forced to watch video of himself calling Trump all sorts of nasty things nonstop, until he was the President.  Then, acting like he was the GOP's savior.  Being shown their hypocrisy would be a good thing for them...

Quoted for your effective research. Or maybe you choose to only see things that benefit your argument?

I seem to remember a time when socialists took lists of names in history, didn't end up going very well... Wait, maybe that was the "old" history before it was re-written by the Left. 

[kaputt]

33 minutes ago, slackline said:

I guess I don't understand Twitter because the link you provided, at least show me, a timestamp of 3:18.  You first posted this almost 25 minutes ago.  How's that work?  Does the timestamp refresh for the person looking at it.  If not, you're reposting a fake tweet because her page doesn't show it.  Totally possible I don't understand Twitter.  First time I ever went to the site.

 

I still ask, what's wrong with the question.  Take note of the hypocrites...

 

Bro, I literally pulled it from going to her page and scrolling down myself and finding it. Not rocket science. 

[Mark1]

2 hours ago, NKAWTG said:

Trump has been the only president in my lifetime who avoided starting a new conflict or invading another country.  Who are we going to pick a fight with now since it's returning to "normal."

Let's hold off on this declaration until we're sure he's not going to saunter down from the presidential bedroom on January 20th and go to work on his 2nd term in the Oval Office as if nothing has happened.

[Sim]

Article II of the Constitution:

The President and Vice President [shall be] elected, as follows:

"Each State shall appoint... a Number of Electors... The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot..."

Notice what's missing from this statement? Any mention of the Press. AP does NOT decide the outcome of the Election. 

 

Edited November 7, 2020 by Sim

[Majestik Møøse]

Life is much easier if you just hate all politicians. Then you can just call them out whenever they say bullshit rather than trying to figure out how to defend their ridiculousness.

[Homestar]

9 minutes ago, Sim said:

AP does NOT decide the outcome of the Election. 

States will soon certify their results and Biden will emerge as the the winner of the election. This is what news outlets are basically reporting. 
 

But you already know this. 

[DosXX]

19 minutes ago, Sim said:

Notice what's missing from this statement? Any mention of the Press. AP does NOT decide the outcome of the Election.

Of course, but at some point it becomes obvious with almost complete certainty. If the electoral votes somehow end up with Trump as the winner I'll be the first on here to accept that as the true result. 

Edited November 7, 2020 by DosXX

[Sua Sponte]

32 minutes ago, Sim said:

Article II of the Constitution:

The President and Vice President [shall be] elected, as follows:

"Each State shall appoint... a Number of Electors... The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot..."

Notice what's missing from this statement? Any mention of the Press. AP does NOT decide the outcome of the Election. 

 

 

[slackline]

Bro, I literally pulled it from going to her page and scrolling down myself and finding it. Not rocket science. 

Didn't scroll to yesterday. My bad, got zero issues admitting I don't Twitter good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[slackline]

Quoted for your effective research. Or maybe you choose to only see things that benefit your argument?
I seem to remember a time when socialists took lists of names in history, didn't end up going very well... Wait, maybe that was the "old" history before it was re-written by the Left. 

Don't be a tool. I read it wrong, that's why I asked for a link. He provided it. I was corrected. NBD.

Point still stands, what's wrong with what she's asking? I think k she's way too immature/inexperienced to be good at her job yet, and the GND is a complete non starter, but she's got a point in remembering who the hypocrites are.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sim]

20 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said:

 

 

[Sua Sponte]

6 minutes ago, Sim said:

 

Neither does a candidate. No matter how many times he types in all caps like a Boomer.

[Hopefulflyer389]