Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 hours ago, brabus said:

WTF, she can go fuck herself. How about SCOTUS just shitcans the entire NFA, considering it’s blatantly unconstitutional. 

Considering they didn't even take on the assault weapons ban case, I highly doubt the SCOTUS will be dealing any blows to the NFA soon.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Allegedly if the NFA 200$ stamp becomes 0$, the registration can be challenged in court since it's technically a registration for who paid the tax.  Or at least that's the R cop-out justification for not fighting the parliamentarians move; I don't believe it'll work & think they're all liars.

i think we got played (again) by R leadership who included SHORT not for 2A reasons but rather a throw-away COA they could dump as fake "concession" to  show compromise.  

 

  • Upvote 2
Posted

My understanding of the process is the parliamentarian goes through and throws stuff out that's policy rather than taxes but the majority leader could add it back in.  My guess is based on the 51-49 vote, there was one or two "Republicans" that didn't want that included, so it wasn't put back in.  Should have put it back in and forced the people to vote.  Easy to remove it and vote again but at least everyone knows where their Senators stand.

  • Upvote 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...