1) Lawman, thanks for acknowledging that it doesn't take an 11F to deliver all the bombs. It's not just the 6th SOS that is ready for this, btw. I love my fighter comrades, but those who think only that they can deliver ordnance should read up Apollo's Warriors. Google is your friend. AFSOC is just a late 20th century name for what AF Special Operations has been doing for decades.
2) CH, as usual you are also right. However, if we got a CSAF level of priority in terms of quantity (as well as quality) folks, we could train those folks pretty quick per AFSOC firehose standard. (though, in the gunship world, hardware is at a premium) AvFID takes more training, I know, but from a schoolhouse perspective, if we just had more folks who didn't suck available to speed through, there's so many ways to accelerate training and experience. As you know, often combat IS part of our training plan, and those opportunities are widespread.
3) To that end: reviving Commando Look has been met with a wall of opposition in the past few years, as I'm sure you know better than I. However, given the number of students we hook across MDSs, if we WERE to get support for bringing that back, along with the resources to make it feasible, we could fix our manning and proficiency levels quickly. I'd say 1 year, if we got some more RPA tenant units in non-Cannonistan locations; 2 years, if not.
4) The problem is, our fighter comrades are hurting badly, as is the UPT capacity to train more raw material. This is absolutely a zero-sum game, and I realize that priorities are not SOCOM-centric. That having been said: UPT studs, if you want to kill bad guys, come to AFSOC. Our exponentially smaller size, given the number of carnivore assets/units we have, means that you WILL do that. A lot. ACC kills people, but ACC is huge. And we offer a FAR closer relationship with America's best on the tip of the spear . . .