dream big Posted yesterday at 12:03 PM Posted yesterday at 12:03 PM 9 hours ago, tac airlifter said: 100% agree and that fact should shame our GOs; their success compared to our prevaricating came from willpower not technical inadequacies on our part. Just reminding everyone we've been tricked before WRT WMD. Not saying our GOs weren’t a contributing factor in the mess that was GWOT (Afghanistan and Levant) but I would say most of the failures belong at the political level.
Clark Griswold Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM Posted yesterday at 01:31 PM I think the most impressive item in this entire conflict is how the 4th strongest IADS in the world completely folded. Today IAF tankers are orbiting over Iran...maybe Fat Amy isn't worthless.Was thinking the same thing, I’m wondering if another system could be used clandestinely but conveyed to the PRC to dissuade cross strait adventurismSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ecugringo Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM Posted yesterday at 01:54 PM 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said: I think the most impressive item in this entire conflict is how the 4th strongest IADS in the world completely folded. Today IAF tankers are orbiting over Iran...maybe Fat Amy isn't worthless. USN needs to control the straight ASAP if they haven’t already. if the IAF is unopposed this early I see a scorched earth policy unfolding
tac airlifter Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM 2 hours ago, dream big said: Not saying our GOs weren’t a contributing factor in the mess that was GWOT (Afghanistan and Levant) but I would say most of the failures belong at the political level. I agree with you, but focus on our military failures because I have informed ideas about causes & solutions. Don't have the same background knowledge to speak confidently regarding political level. 24 minutes ago, ecugringo said: if the IAF is unopposed this early I see a scorched earth policy unfolding Agree 100%. If I were Iran, this is obviously the time to play every card. Not sure if they have a nuke, but the claim about enriched uranium means dirty bomb is on the table. If they don't use it, they never had it. my final thought seeing Iran fold so quickly is that I am angry we didn't do it ourselves & sooner. They were murdering US soldiers with EFP's in 2007 and we were too afraid of expanding the war to give them what they deserved. Fuck Iran I hope their mullahs are dragged through the streets whether they have WMD or not. But we must not nation build in the aftermath. 1 6
ecugringo Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 42 minutes ago, tac airlifter said: I agree with you, but focus on our military failures because I have informed ideas about causes & solutions. Don't have the same background knowledge to speak confidently regarding political level. Agree 100%. If I were Iran, this is obviously the time to play every card. Not sure if they have a nuke, but the claim about enriched uranium means dirty bomb is on the table. If they don't use it, they never had it. my final thought seeing Iran fold so quickly is that I am angry we didn't do it ourselves & sooner. They were murdering US soldiers with EFP's in 2007 and we were too afraid of expanding the war to give them what they deserved. Iran I hope their mullahs are dragged through the streets whether they have WMD or not. But we must not nation build in the aftermath. They could sink some tankers and do quite a bit of damage. 25% of global crude passes through.
Lawman Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Agree 100%. If I were Iran, this is obviously the time to play every card. Not sure if they have a nuke, but the claim about enriched uranium means dirty bomb is on the table. If they don't use it, they never had it. my final thought seeing Iran fold so quickly is that I am angry we didn't do it ourselves & sooner. They were murdering US soldiers with EFP's in 2007 and we were too afraid of expanding the war to give them what they deserved. Iran I hope their mullahs are dragged through the streets whether they have WMD or not. But we must not nation build in the aftermath.Until the Hezbollah missile threat was gone this was never on the table.Lebanon being destroyed and Syria falling was a shaping operation to allow for this, otherwise things in Israel would be far uglier than right now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
Day Man Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, tac airlifter said: my final thought seeing Iran fold so quickly is that I am angry we didn't do it ourselves & sooner. They were murdering US soldiers... just curious...do you feel the same about Pakistan?
disgruntledemployee Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 21 hours ago, ecugringo said: So I read Gabbard testified that Iran was not starting their Nuke program. Trump is telling Iran to surrender unconditionally. wild times Gabbard is off message, probably because of Middle East sympathies (imo). No idea why, just like no real idea why she visited Syria back then. She either has to shut up or resign or she'll get mean tweeted and fired.
Lawman Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I think the most impressive item in this entire conflict is how the 4th strongest IADS in the world completely folded. Today IAF tankers are orbiting over Iran...maybe Fat Amy isn't worthless.Is anybody else secretly hoping the Iranians manage to get just 1x jet in the Air and have it square off with a 35.And then the 35 gets 1x more Air to Air kill than the Raptor….Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 5 1
FUSEPLUG Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, Lawman said: And then the 35 gets 1x more Air to Air kill than the Raptor…. Oh, I'm sorry. So this never happened? 2 7
brabus Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 5 hours ago, Day Man said: just curious...do you feel the same about Pakistan? I do. Fuck Pakistan; they’re right up there with Iran on the list of POS countries that deserve far worse than what they’ve actually received. 1
Lawman Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Oh, I'm sorry. So this never happened? I think the day the F-35 has an actual airplane to its credit, they’ll wish more than anything that it hadn’t.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clark Griswold Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Didn’t the Iranians get Flanker 35s in exchange for drones with Russians?Ran away or still being hidden?Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
uhhello Posted 14 hours ago Author Posted 14 hours ago 1 hour ago, Clark Griswold said: Didn’t the Iranians get Flanker 35s in exchange for drones with Russians? Ran away or still being hidden? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Russia got their drones, Iran never got their ghost airframes they were promised. There were MIG-29's scrambling the first night but they all flew south from what i've seen.
Clark Griswold Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Russia got their drones, Iran never got their ghost airframes they were promised. There were MIG-29's scrambling the first night but they all flew south from what i've seen. Gotcha, tactical retreat vs turned into twisted parts.I was surprised the Russians didn’t push them or kinda make it a deal or no deal offer for their MiG-35. They need / want to keep MiG in business and as they only operate them for one of their aero teams, I figured they would tell them after X number of drones delivered it’s this or nothing.As they already have 29s, seems like a way of telling them these are the planes you really want. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BigE Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Concur. But don’t think D-SEAD (didn’t we use to just call that DEAD) nor EA has been the game changer. If I had to guess, there is some serious non-kinetics/cyber employed that have allowed Israel to so quickly degrade Iranian IADS. Whatever it is - good on em’!
Lawman Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Concur. But don’t think D-SEAD (didn’t we use to just call that DEAD) nor EA has been the game changer. If I had to guess, there is some serious non-kinetics/cyber employed that have allowed Israel to so quickly degrade Iranian IADS. Whatever it is - good on em’!What it should do it remind a lot of our Intel people, and more importantly “Theirs” that Air Supremacy is still achievable and our quiver of options may be just as brutally effective.96 hours to full and total disintegration… if I’m a Red commander I’m not thinking how quickly and how much can you do across a body of water under that kind of a time table. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lawman Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Jesus…This is like a Master level course on how to conduct multi domain warfarehttps://x.com/i/web/status/1935406006344822975Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
arg Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Lawman said: Jesus… This is like a Master level course on how to conduct multi domain warfare https://x.com/i/web/status/1935406006344822975 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk We just drop leaflets
tac airlifter Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 11 hours ago, Day Man said: just curious...do you feel the same about Pakistan? I don't. The Paks were terrible "allies" and the ISI did play both sides (US & AQ & even Taliban). I'd label Pakistan a passive adversary. But what Iran did was use state funded university engineers to design weapons specifically to increase IED lethality, then send IRGC commandos into Iraq to train/advise/assist Shia militia employing those weapons against us. They killed hundreds of our guys, we knew it & could prove it, and on a tactical level guys made valiant efforts to fight it. But at a senior level, we let it happen because decisive reprisal was a bridge to far for the feckless Bush administration. Lawman is right about events since then shaping the present battle space advantageously. But those things left an impression on me and it stuck. What do you think? Do you think Pakistan was a more disruptive influence than Iran? I didn't play in OEF till 09, it was all OIF 04-08 so there's a lot I don't know about Pak influence.
uhhello Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 47 minutes ago, arg said: We just drop leaflets Pretty sure we did the same thing in the gulf wars with EC-130's
Lawman Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago We just drop leafletsThat’s because we mistakenly thought the Afghans could read…I mean TV signal is just TV signal. And it’s really easy to out broadcast your opponents propaganda source when your opponent signal tower is a bent pile of burnt metal and you are orbiting above their capital with impunity. It’s funny that people on the other side keep posting videos of Tehran like “the lights are still on!” Yeah… we wouldn’t want you to miss anything.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
uhhello Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago (edited) Space Invaders Skip to 1:40 and go full screen Edited 9 hours ago by uhhello
ClearedHot Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Hearkens back to the Blitz in WW2. Interestingly Hezbollah has not fired a single shot at Israel! The attack on the hospital may be a tipping point, pictures now show the Iranians used cluster munitions on the hospital.
BFM this Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 8 hours ago, uhhello said: Space Invaders Yes, but I think you're thinking of the other classic: Missile Command
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now