5 hours ago5 hr 1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said:Iran said come closer and we are getting rocked. Lost 3 aircraft in 5 hours.
5 hours ago5 hr 15 minutes ago, Polar Bear said:Why are they not using Apache escorts.You should let the DOW know of this tactic. These guys should really have some escorts with them.....
5 hours ago5 hr 2 minutes ago, Mole said:Range?Makes sense. Saw a video of the hawks refueling off a herc.
5 hours ago5 hr 5 hours ago, B52gator said: This isn't Ahmad taking plink shots with his AK over in the 'Stan.I stand corrected
4 hours ago4 hr 3 hours ago, No One said:I've gone into plenty of sketchy spots fighter guys won't ever go. Don't kid yourself, plenty of fighter guys have been with BQZip's mom...
3 hours ago3 hr LinkedIn#csar #airoperations #csar | Tim De Zitter𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀: 𝗨𝗛-𝟲𝟬 𝗣𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗛𝗮𝘄𝗸 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗕𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗦𝗔𝗥 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 According to reporting by Newsmax journalist Carla Babb, a U.S. HH-60G Pav
2 hours ago2 hr 4 hours ago, Vito said:AMAZING, defending the Iranian regime and giving them the benefit of doubt…But if Iran nuked somebody, it would be exactly like all the libs after 9/11, All they did was second guess why we didn’t do anything before about Al Qiada.I remember that as bipartisan second guessing which got us to the Patriot Act. But maybe my memory is bad
1 hour ago1 hr I'm not sure using "We've got enough nuclear material for 11 bombs" was a good negotiating point from the Iranian side of the table. Didn't seem to get the result I think they thought it would.
17 minutes ago17 min 5 hours ago, Sua Sponte said:Really surprised they didn't eat some mini-gun in return.
8 minutes ago8 min They probably didn’t know they were being shot at unless they would’ve seen muzzle flash or impact from a round.
Just now1 min 42 minutes ago, TreeA10 said:I'm not sure using "We've got enough nuclear material for 11 bombs" was a good negotiating point from the Iranian side of the table. Didn't seem to get the result I think they thought it would.It's also literally *the* difficult part of making a nuke. The rest is largely simple (for a country with advanced manufacturing capabilities like Iran) and extremely easy to hide. The massive array of centrifuges is the tricky bit. It's amazing to hear people argue that "Iran shouldn't have nukes, but we can at least let them get close." There's not a single use for Uranium enriched to 50% aside from weaponry. It can be perfectly logical for Iran to want nukes for deterrence. It's more likely they would use it to wipe out Israel, but who cares? Just because it's logical doesn't mean we should allow it.
Create an account or sign in to comment